On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dirk wrote: > Should "at" execute the lavrec command with exact the priority as when > you start directly from commandline?
See my message earlier, and 'at' man page The answer is 'no'. > > And another thing, I have a 2.4.20 kernel patched with the set from Con > Colivas. But I don't know if that makes a difference for at. Oh, and xfs > filesystem, but that matter for "at" either I guess. > > As far as I know there no other processes running which can interfere. > When I experiment with "at" I usually use "at -now + 1 minutes", so > nothing really changes on the system. > > Dirk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
