Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler v0.2.0 available

2002-12-31 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>Hi Matto, Hey, Andrew, happy new year, >I haven't had a chance to look at the code so I don't know how wide the >H-scaling filter can be. A filter can be as wide as it wants to be --- the code is quite general in that regard (hence not as fast as it could be for any given filter). > H

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler v0.2.0 available

2002-12-31 Thread Steven M. Schultz
> From: Matto Marjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > How about trying it without yuvdenoise in the pipeline? > yuvdenoise does quite a bit of low-pass filtering of its own, which means > that later stages are less prone to aliasing ('cause it leaves less HF Ok - here you are - and this almo

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler v0.2.0 available

2002-12-31 Thread Andrew Stevens
Hi Matto, I haven't had a chance to look at the code so I don't know how wide the H-scaling filter can be. However, if you can do it a Lanczos kernel or windowed sinc at 7 or 9 taps width is generally what is used professionally (resources permitting). V-scalers are usually narrower as video s

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler v0.2.0 available

2002-12-30 Thread Steven M. Schultz
> From: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 sms wse 144355260 Dec 30 18:55 chicken-y4mscaler.mpg > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 sms wse 146821024 Dec 30 16:45 chicken-yuvscaler.mpg > > > > Not bad at all! > > Does the smaller output size actually mean y4mscaler is "better"? Running

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler v0.2.0 available

2002-12-30 Thread Matto Marjanovic
> You rang? ;) > > 14000 frames (~8 minutes) of data captured (by another Canopus convert) > from a VHS tape and on its way to SVCD. > > 1) > smil2yuv -a $N.wav $N.smil | \ > y4mshift -n -6 | \ > yuvdenoise -S 0 -r 16 -t 5 -l 3 -b 20,56,

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler v0.2.0 available

2002-12-30 Thread Trent Piepho
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > The two .mpg files: > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 sms wse 144355260 Dec 30 18:55 chicken-y4mscaler.mpg > -rw-rw-r-- 1 sms wse 146821024 Dec 30 16:45 chicken-yuvscaler.mpg > > Not bad at all! Does the smaller output size actually mean y4m

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler v0.2.0 available

2002-12-30 Thread Steven M. Schultz
> From: Matto Marjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > yuvscaler, but, yes, it also seems to do be able to do a better job > of downscaling --- i.e. less junk in the high-frequency bands. I'd > be curious to see the results of an independent real-life comparison > of MPEG encoding bit usage using the

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler v0.2.0 available

2002-12-30 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>Version 0.2.0 of y4mscaler is now available on-line at: > > http://www.mir.com/DMG/Software/y4mscaler.html In case anyone has downloaded this since my last message, please do it again... The previous version was compiled without any optimization enabled. I just uploaded a "-O2" version.