> From: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 sms wse 144355260 Dec 30 18:55 chicken-y4mscaler.mpg
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 sms wse 146821024 Dec 30 16:45 chicken-yuvscaler.mpg
> >
> > Not bad at all!
>
> Does the smaller output size actually mean y4mscaler is "better"? Running
In this case I think that will be the case. I ran the 2nd encoding
run remotely and will view the results tomorrow. Matt did mention
less high frequency noise being introduced - which would be in line
with the size of reduction observed tonight.
It'll be interesting to hear what others report with y4mscaler.
> your video though a Gaussian blur filter would increase the compression ratio,
> but it's probably not what most people would consider an improvement.
In _some_ cases it could well be an improvement. Selective
blurring/smoothing is one of the tricks used, I'm told, to improve the
quality of movies that get released on DVDs.
Much too depends, doesn't it, on the source material?
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
