Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-30 Thread Dave Dodge
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:41:07PM +, John Gay wrote: [...] > We had several Super 8 home movies when I was a kid. Our local library also > carried Super 8 movies before the advent of video tape. For example I have the home version of "Star Wars" on Super8. It's only one reel (16 or 17 minut

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-29 Thread E.Chalaron
So far I am using the following : ( find . -name \*.ppm | xargs cat ) | ppm2raw -a > reelB.dv and it works fine Thanks again to all for the advice you gave ... E > You'd get better speed with something like: > find -name \*.ppm | xargs -n200 cat | ppmtoy4m > cat can't take 28800 files on the comm

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-29 Thread E.Chalaron
> Super 8 is an old home movie film format. Based on the info provided, there > are 6 frames per inch. Not sure about the frame-rate, but I imagine it's > somewhere around 20 - 30 per second. 18 fps... or ideally 24 fps. Most people were using it at 18 fps, processing was expensive. > most like

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-28 Thread Trent Piepho
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Maarten de Boer wrote: > > the following is (of course) sending me back an error > > > > find . -name \*.ppm | ppmtoy4m | blabla > > How about > > find . -name \*.ppm -exec ppmtoy4m {} \; | blabla That won't work, as you can't just cat y4m streams together. The have headers

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-27 Thread Maarten de Boer
> the following is (of course) sending me back an error > > find . -name \*.ppm | ppmtoy4m | blabla How about find . -name \*.ppm -exec ppmtoy4m {} \; | blabla or maybe find . -name \*.ppm | while read filename; do ppmtoy4m $filename; done | blabla ? maarten

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-26 Thread John Gay
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 20:55, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: > > Anyway I have another small thing here. > > A 400 ft reel of Super 8 comes to 28800 individual frames, which is > > obviously too much to handle for bash/cat > > Did you really take 28800 individual

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-26 Thread E.Chalaron
> ps: If it *is* black&white... try PGM images and the new "pnmtoy4m"! Thanks Matt, will give a go to it as Steven Shultz already did recommand it to me... yes some are B&W I was wondering if it would be possible to colour them though just for the technical challenge :-) E --

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-26 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>From: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:55:50 -0800 (PST) > >On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: ... >> I know that >> find . -name \*.tga | xargs -n1 tgatoppm | ppmtoy4m | blabla > >Try this: >find . -name \*.tga | xargs -n1 cat | ppmtoy4m

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-26 Thread Trent Piepho
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: > Anyway I have another small thing here. > A 400 ft reel of Super 8 comes to 28800 individual frames, which is obviously > too much to handle for bash/cat Did you really take 28800 individual pictures by hand? > I know that > find . -name \*.tga | xargs

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-26 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo > > Anyway I have another small thing here. > > A 400 ft reel of Super 8 comes to 28800 individual frames, which is > > obviously > > too much to handle for bash/cat > I was waiting for that issue to come up ;) I have once a Problem with more than 20 frames in one direcotry. rm,

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-26 Thread Roine Gustafsson
On Wednesday, Jan 26, 2005, at 06:04 Europe/Stockholm, E.Chalaron wrote: Thanks all for your advice. Will do something about parameters :-) like RTFM and behaving myself... Anyway I have another small thing here. A 400 ft reel of Super 8 comes to 28800 individual frames, which is obviously

Re: [Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-25 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: > Thanks all for your advice. Will do something about parameters :-) like > Anyway I have another small thing here. > A 400 ft reel of Super 8 comes to 28800 individual frames, which is obviously > too much to handle for bash/cat I

[Mjpeg-users] more telecine stuff

2005-01-25 Thread E.Chalaron
Thanks all for your advice. Will do something about parameters :-) like RTFM and behaving myself... Anyway I have another small thing here. A 400 ft reel of Super 8 comes to 28800 individual frames, which is obviously too much to handle for bash/cat I know that find . -name \*.tga | xar