On Wed, 18 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not sure that I can answer on behalf of the wider windows community.
Well, you're the only one to express a serious interest in several
years so that makes you the "designated representative" :-)
> Having said that I have searc
> I guess what I'm curious about is if the files would be missed if they
> were removed.
>
> Between cygwin and mingw32 I think there is sufficient win32 support...
>
> Cheers,
> Steven Schultz
>
I'm note sure that I can answer on behalf of the wider windows comm
On Wed, 18 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > win32:
> > config.h getopt.c getopt.h mplex win32defs.h
> > win32/mplex:
> > mplex.dsp mplexlib.dsp mplexlib.dsw
> >
> > necessary? They are quite old and I'm wondering if they are needed
> They are not required for cyg
> When building mjpegtools on a win32 system do you know if the files
> in win32/ are necessary? Specifically are the files:
>
> win32:
> config.h getopt.c getopt.h mplex win32defs.h
>
> win32/mplex:
> mplex.dsp mplexlib.dsp mplexlib.dsw
>
> neces
On Tue, 17 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am send attach diff to allow ./configure to work under both cygwin and
> Mingw32/Msys.
> Together with my first patch to fix problems with leading underscores on the
> win32
The changes are in CVS - but who knows when they will be visib
I am send attach diff to allow ./configure to work under both cygwin and
Mingw32/Msys.
Together with my first patch to fix problems with leading underscores on the
win32
environment, it is possible to ./configure ; make
The configure file distributed with jpeg-mmx would appear to be a work in
p