Re: [Mjpeg-users] lavrec: negative lost frames?!

2003-09-18 Thread Brian Edmonds
Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> At a certain point the numbers would just go nutzo, and usually >> lavrec would bail with an audio sync error a few seconds later. > Does the attached patch help? As I mentioned, I've not played with recording for months and months, so I do not currentl

Re: [Mjpeg-users] lavrec: negative lost frames?!

2003-09-17 Thread Brian Edmonds
"Matt Trim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After further tests it appears to happen at around 9 minutes and 8 > seconds into the recording! I haven't tried recording for months now, but this is one of the symptoms I had with my ongoing inability to record beyond 20 minutes. At a certain point the n

[Mjpeg-users] spam on the list (was boasts)

2003-08-14 Thread Brian Edmonds
So what's up with all the pathetic spam that seems to have started coming through on the mjpeg lists more often these days? If you'd like to move the lists somewhere with better spam filtering, if sourceforge can't hack it, I'd be happy to host them for you. I know my leaving the list wouldn't be

Re: [Mjpeg-users] spam on the list

2003-08-14 Thread Brian Edmonds
Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I basically agree with you and therefore propose to move it to > restricted mode. [...] In the past, we didn't do this so people > could send their questions even without subscribing. I'm not familiar with the Sourceforge mailing list software, but doe

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Error Audio ring buffer overflow

2003-06-25 Thread Brian Edmonds
Alan Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The error appears usually after around 20mins of recording, but will > sometimes appear after 6mins, 11mins, etc. This sounds almost identical to the problem I've had with my DC10+ since day one (back in January 2002). I've never been able to record more

Re: [Mjpeg-users] stability issues with 440BX and DC10plus?

2003-01-12 Thread Brian Edmonds
Martin Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The reason I asked is that the ATA controller (or the BIOS?) on my > 440BX happily negotiates a nice, fast mode in the udma5 (IIRC) range > with the disk, but anything above udma2 works like crap. With the > built-in controller, that is. I've had thi

Re: [Mjpeg-users] stability issues with 440BX and DC10plus?

2003-01-12 Thread Brian Edmonds
Martin Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What does hdparm -i on the relevant disk say? ...assuming you're using > ATA, that is... # hdparm -i /dev/hda /dev/hda: Model=MAXTOR 6L040J2, FwRev=A93.0500, SerialNo=662132710203 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs } RawCHS=16383

Re: [Mjpeg-users] stability issues with 440BX and DC10plus?

2003-01-12 Thread Brian Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > BUT: once in a while, the capturing with lavrec stops (ie: timer > stops, and after a while, I get the well-known "error syncing on a > buffer, timer expired" message. I have never been able to record more than 20 minutes with my DC10plus and 440BX motherboard (ASUS P2B