On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Well, it could be a brief bitrate spike or something like that. mplex
> would not complain, yet the stream would be non-compliant.
Sure it would complain - at the _least_ you'd see the numbers in the
Average/Peak summary at the end. If
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 19:56 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> There are several other likely candidates for where the problem lies.
> Sure mpeg2enc could have an issue - BUT if mplex says the .m2v is
> OK, and if DVD Studio Pro says the file is OK and if it plays in
> all but one player - the th
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:51 +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> Steven has already raised a number of possible causes, but there is another
> one. The material which exhibits this problem - any chance it was a DV
> encoded file (a Quicktime/DV file perhaps) itself encoded using libdv or
> ffmpeg?
No
Hi -
Fingers ahead of the brain (too much multi-tasking ;))
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sms sms 153813254078 Sep 6 01:26 lald.mov
>
> 8bit 4:2:2 uncompressed (the original 10bit 4:2:2 file is about 25%
missing word - should have been "
Hi -
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> times of high motion. ffmpeg's DV codec is better (in that the effect is
> much reduced) but there are still issues. The visibility of the problem does
> depend on the DVD player used: on some it's bearly visible, on others it's
> painfully obvi
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Actually, I'm concerned with an issue that I've seen before with MPEG2
> streams generated with mpeg2enc and some DVD players that follow the DVD
> standard specifications very literally (e.g. JVC XV-N55) - during some
> scenes when there's a lot of motion, the image stutter
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Dividing my time between a million things I _must_ do. Playing with
> mjpegtools is something I enjoy but that doesn't put any bread on my table.
We all have day jobs ;) I just made mjpegtools the millionth+1 thing
that must be done is
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Actually, I'm concerned with an issue that I've seen before with MPEG2
> streams generated with mpeg2enc and some DVD players that follow the DVD
> standard specifications very literally (e.g. JVC XV-N55) - during some
There are several other li
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 19:39 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with:
>
> Where have you been for the last several months? ;)
Dividing my time between a million things I _must_ do. Playing with
mjpegtools is some
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote:
> FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with:
Where have you been for the last several months? ;)
> - Fedora 4
Already done.
> - gcc-4.0.1
Done - on Intel/AMD/PPC
> - transcode-1.0
Unknown - but feel free to do that a
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:20 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with:
> - Fedora 4
> - gcc-4.0.1
> - transcode-1.0
> - reasonable settings for DV-to-DVD conversion
Actually, I'm concerned with an issue that I've seen before with MPEG2
streams generated with mpeg2enc
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 18:33 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 15:17 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3.
> >
> > Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;)
>
> I was thinking the same thing... :
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 15:17 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3.
>
> Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;)
I was thinking the same thing... :). Prolly this weekend (assuming
homework doesn't kill me; darn, I
Howdy -
It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3.
Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;)
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conferen
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Gernot Ziegler wrote:
> > Sorry I can't help you directly, but I think there is a new release
> > 1.6.3-RC3 on
> > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5776
> Anyway during that time, i guessed it was gcc4 that was too strict
> so i reverted to branch 3.x, and
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:03:39 +0200
From: Brice DUTHEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gernot Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem compiling mjpegtool on suse (fwd)
Gernot Ziegler wrote:
> Hej Brice !
>
> Sorry I can't help you directly, but I think t
Hej Brice !
Sorry I can't help you directly, but I think there is a new release
1.6.3-RC3 on
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5776
that you might want to take a look at .. I also crossposted to the
mjpeg-users mailing list, maybe someone here can provide you with more
info reg
17 matches
Mail list logo
