Re: [Mjpeg-users] problem with mpeg2enc and -M option

2005-02-02 Thread Trent Piepho
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > mpeg2enc doesn't seem to work correctly when I use the -M option for > > multi-cpu > > encoding. > > Did you do a 'cvs update' recently (within the last week or 10 days)? You're right, it looks li

Re: [Mjpeg-users] problem with mpeg2enc and -M option

2005-02-02 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Trent Piepho wrote: > mpeg2enc doesn't seem to work correctly when I use the -M option for multi-cpu > encoding. Did you do a 'cvs update' recently (within the last week or 10 days)? I had the same problem (only on a OS/X system at the time) and Andrew

[Mjpeg-users] problem with mpeg2enc and -M option

2005-02-02 Thread Trent Piepho
mpeg2enc doesn't seem to work correctly when I use the -M option for multi-cpu encoding. I tired encoding a stream with these options: -f 5 -B 299 -S 700 -K kvcd -a 2 -p -g 6 -G 25 -b 2500 -q 3 --dualprime-mpeg2 and then the same exact options with -M 2 added. Without -M 2, mpeg2enc generates a

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Can't make mjpegtools-1.6.2

2005-02-02 Thread Ron Keller
Bernhard Praschinger wrote: Ron Keller wrote: lavpipe.c: In function `close_segment_inputs': lavpipe.c:585: error: label at end of compound statement What is in 585 ? If it lookes like that KEEP_SOURCE: change it to that KEEP_SOURCE: ; Or the other way round. auf hoffentlich bald, Berni

Re: [Mjpeg-users] active in y4mscaler

2005-02-02 Thread E.Chalaron
> > Since you are essentially converting PPM->Y4M->PPM, use 4:4:4 sampling > the whole way. E.g. 'ppmtoy4m -S 444' and leave off the '-O chromass=...' > for y4mscaler. Ok got that and have not tried pnm yet Thanks for your other mails, just leaving so will RTFM and apply tomorrow Cheer

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler / wait there is more !

2005-02-02 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>From: "E.Chalaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... >> What happens if you do not use the 'tl' and let y4mscaler default > >same stuff, though I have not tried cc explicitely >Yuvscaler is handling the job properly now... ("not segfaulting" != "properly") -matt m. --

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler / more

2005-02-02 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>As soon as I get rid of -I active, the thing is going very well :-( ?? >Am I using bad values ??? Nope, the values are fine, but they are triggering a bug. (I remember this problem arising before, somewhere, but I don't remember what the resolution was.) ... > INFO: [y4mscaler] ===

Re: [Mjpeg-users] active in y4mscaler

2005-02-02 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>I have troubles using the "active" option from y4mscaler, >When I specify a region : the output is nill, getting rid of the -I active >and I have something >here is my comand line : > >(find . -name \*.ppm | xargs cat) | ppmtoy4m -F 25:1 -L -S 420mpeg2 | \ >yuvdenoise -F -r 16 -t 2 | y4

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler / wait there is more !

2005-02-02 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: > One step at a time :-) This was a 8 mm has not the same size as Super8 no > need to sample black borders Oh, ok - it wasn't clear you were processing 8mm rather than Super8 > > What happens if you do not use the 'tl' and let y4mscaler default

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler / wait there is more !

2005-02-02 Thread E.Chalaron
> I thought the images you had were 1388x1024 or something like that > rather than 1280x960? One step at a time :-) This was a 8 mm has not the same size as Super8 no need to sample black borders > What happens if you do not use the 'tl' and let y4mscaler default same stuff, t

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler / more

2005-02-02 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: > As soon as I get rid of -I active, the thing is going very well :-( ?? > Am I using bad values ??? Yes, I think you may be using bad values but let's take a closer look... I thought the images you had were 1388x1024 or

[Mjpeg-users] yuvscaler / y4mscaler

2005-02-02 Thread E.Chalaron
It works fine with yuvscaler and the requested size ... ? Puzzled me E --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publi

[Mjpeg-users] y4mscaler / more

2005-02-02 Thread E.Chalaron
Hello Steven Ok here we go .. As soon as I get rid of -I active, the thing is going very well :-( ?? Am I using bad values ??? INFO: [y4mscaler] <<< sample aspect ratio: 1:1 INFO: [y4mscaler] Source matte region defaulting to full source frame. INFO: [y4mscaler] Target interla

Re: [Mjpeg-users] active in y4mscaler

2005-02-02 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, E.Chalaron wrote: > I have troubles using the "active" option from y4mscaler, > When I specify a region : the output is nill, getting rid of the -I active > and I have something Hmmm - that's something new (and definitely unusual), haven't had that happen wh

[Mjpeg-users] active in y4mscaler

2005-02-02 Thread E.Chalaron
Hi I have troubles using the "active" option from y4mscaler, When I specify a region : the output is nill, getting rid of the -I active and I have something here is my comand line : (find . -name \*.ppm | xargs cat) | ppmtoy4m -F 25:1 -L -S 420mpeg2 | \ yuvdenoise -F -r 16 -t 2 | y4mscaler -v

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Can't make mjpegtools-1.6.2

2005-02-02 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Ron Keller wrote: > > I am trying to build mjpegtools-1.6.2 on a LinuxFromScratch system with > the following specs: > > gcc = 3.4.1 That one is rather new. > glib = 1.2.10 with gcc34-1.patch > gtk = 1.2.10 > SDL = 1.2.8 > X = Xorg-6.8.1 > kernel = 2.6.8.1 > cpu = Athlon XP > > Does anyone rec

[Mjpeg-users] Re: [MPlayer-users] y4mscaler in encode2mpeg

2005-02-02 Thread romildo
Hello. Yesterday I have sugested (see below) the inclusion of y4mscaler as an optional scaler in the encode2mpeg program: http://encode2mpeg.sourceforge.net/encode2mpeg.html encode2mpeg is a front end to MPlayer/MEncoder and mjpegtools. It is able to convert any kind of video that mp