Hallo
> I've been basing my CG trials on a Linux Journal article.
Fine :-)
> It states that the proper size for PAL video is 720 X 576 and NTSC is
> 720 X 480
For full size video.
> I've been creating some animations based on the 720 X 576 size, but the images
> seem extremely grainy to me. Als
> ffmpeg has AC3 encoding capability. At one time though (I have not
> tried it recently) it did not produce DVD compatible files (the
> channelassignment/rematrixing-coefficients were not correct). You
There were some changes made to ffmpeg about 6 months ago, maybe a little
Hi,
On Thursday 15 January 2004 22:17, John Gay wrote:
> ...the proper size for PAL video is 720 X 576 and NTSC is 720 X 480
> I've been creating some animations based on the 720 X 576 size, but the
> images seem extremely grainy to me.
You might want to create the images at a larger size then do
I've been basing my CG trials on a Linux Journal article.
It states that the proper size for PAL video is 720 X 576 and NTSC is
720 X 480
I've been creating some animations based on the 720 X 576 size, but the images
seem extremely grainy to me. Also, this seems to be for standard TV aspect,
n
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> to different problems. If I need to reauthor after updating from the CVS
> then I will look into the settings to see if I can at least drop the video
I think recoding after updating will be necessary but will solve
the problem.
> Ho
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> This is what mplayer reports the specs of the file are, with the bit rate at
> 9375 kbps. And that is way over your estimated 8000 kbps.
>
> Playing VTS_01_1.VOB
> Detected MPEG-PS file format!
> VIDEO: MPEG2 720x480 (aspect 2) 29.97 fps 9375.0
This is what mplayer reports the specs of the file are, with the bit rate at
9375 kbps. And that is way over your estimated 8000 kbps.
Playing VTS_01_1.VOB
Detected MPEG-PS file format!
VIDEO: MPEG2 720x480 (aspect 2) 29.97 fps 9375.0 kbps (1171.9 kbyte/s)
Detected audio codec: [mp3] afm:1
On Thursday 15 January 2004 13:25, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> If you mentioned the encoding parameters I've lost the mail item - I'm
> curious how the .m2v file was created.
>
Well bit rate would make some sense here because the windows system that it
played well was a P4-2.4 GHz. No
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> When played back by mplayer, it plays without any sound drop outs. However,
Ah, ok - that would indicate the .mpg file is good.
> message that your computer is to slow to play this file. It displays the
> screen size is reduced until hit
Trying a second time to get the correct return address!
On Thursday 15 January 2004 01:50, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> You should give mplayer a try. www.mplayerhq.hu
>
> Players just about anything.
>
When played back by mplayer, it plays without any sound drop outs. However,
whe
Hallo
> On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:14, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> > > > The final result was a smooth flowing image (on my DVD player) with a
> > > > bit less quality than the original - it's a bit blotchy in certain
> > > > scenes. The original Dolby Digital (2 channel) sound was preserved.
> > >
> >
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> Thanks to Steven I was able to compile the CVS version of the mjpeg tools
> and create my first DVD type movie. (If you want to call it that.) The video
Hurrah!
> images look great and play according to the creation. But my DVD player
> is
12 matches
Mail list logo
