On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 08:37, Zsolt KOZAK wrote:
>
> Everybody!
> Does anyone use lavrec with ext3?
Yup. Have been doing so forever.
> If yes, is ext3 fast enough?
Yup.
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I once had problems with 'at' versus 'cron'. Cron jobs worked fine, at
jobs didn't. Tured out that it was a priority issue. By default 'at'
starts jobs with a low priority.
Try putting the jobs in a higher que with at -q:
(from 'man at')
Queues with higher letters run with increased nicen
On 2003-06-04 14:07, Dirk wrote:
Oh, and xfs
filesystem, but that matter for "at" either I guess.
Dou you use lavrec on xfs also when you use it from the command line?
I have ext3 partitions but I have an ext2 filesystem dedicated for
grabbing videos, because ext3 is too slow for me... I hav
Should "at" execute the lavrec command with exact the priority as when
you start directly from commandline?
And another thing, I have a 2.4.20 kernel patched with the set from Con
Colivas. But I don't know if that makes a difference for at. Oh, and xfs
filesystem, but that matter for "at" either
On 2003-06-04 12:58, Fabian Ritzmann wrote:
Lots of inserted and deleted frames. When I use directly from
commandline there are hardly any inserted or deleted frames.
You probably considered that but just to make sure - did you check that
there are no fancy screensavers or heavy-duty cron job
Dirk wrote:
> > >Hi all. Can anyone explain me why lavrec doesn't work very well with the
> > >"at" command?
> > >
> > What do you mean under "doesn't work very well"? Could you explain it?
> >
> Lots of inserted and deleted frames. When I use directly from
> commandline there are hardly any inse
On 2003-06-04 12:15, Dirk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:00:08PM +0200, Zsolt KOZAK wrote:
What do you mean under "doesn't work very well"? Could you explain it?
Lots of inserted and deleted frames. When I use directly from
commandline there are hardly any inserted or deleted frames.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:00:08PM +0200, Zsolt KOZAK wrote:
> On 2003-06-04 11:36, Dirk wrote:
>
> >Hi all. Can anyone explain me why lavrec doesn't work very well with the
> >"at" command?
> >
> What do you mean under "doesn't work very well"? Could you explain it?
>
Lots of inserted and delete
On 2003-06-04 11:36, Dirk wrote:
Hi all. Can anyone explain me why lavrec doesn't work very well with the
"at" command?
What do you mean under "doesn't work very well"? Could you explain it?
It doesn't matter if I use a script with a lavrec command or
if I use the lavrec command directly with at.
Can anyone help in resolving the error. Thanks.
distribution: debian/sid
automake version: 1.5
cd mjpeg_tools; ./autogen.sh
**Warning**: I am going to run `configure' with no arguments.
If you wish to pass any to it, please specify them on the
`./autogen.sh' command line.
processing .
Running l
Hi all. Can anyone explain me why lavrec doesn't work very well with the
"at" command? It doesn't matter if I use a script with a lavrec command or
if I use the lavrec command directly with at.
Lavrec does exactly what I want except scheduling a capture doesn't
work. (very well)
Thanks,
Dirk
Hi
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 19.23, you wrote:
[snip]
> > Having said this I am trying now to make the whole stuff more
> > comfortable. Therefore I tried to use linux video studio - and failed
> > miserably.
>
> Which version do you use ?
linuxvideostudio-0.1.7
>
[snip]
>
> Which page did you use
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 22:39:54 2003
>> > Hmmm, the common problem mentioned has been "splotches of grey" in
>> > low light scenes - hadn't heard 'ghosting' mentioned before.
>>
>> That's the same problem, just differently described. If yo
On Tuesday 03 Jun 2003 20:02, Zarathustra wrote:
> has anybody managed to copy a dvd onto a dvd(+r)?
Try dvdbackup. I've never actually used it for making a copy of a DVD, only
for caching one on the hard disk, but apparently you can burn the on-disk
structure to a DVD-R(W) and get a playable di
Le Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:21:10 -0400
Matto Marjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
[...]
> Thank you, and thanks for the independent testing. (The 'box' filter
> has a couple of issues still, but who really wants the box filter? :)
Yes, the box filter output is very ugly. Also notice that the
Hallo listmembers,
has anybody managed to copy a dvd onto a dvd(+r)?
I can rip the dvd with dvd::rip which provides me of the VOB files.
As far as I understand, I have to burn them on dvd using the UDF file system,
in order to make the dvd compatible with stand alone dvd players.
Can anybody h
Hallo
> after all the hints which I got from the list I am now very proud to have my
> first VCD ready with a result comparable to the source quality (bad Video8).
>
> Having said this I am trying now to make the whole stuff more comfortable.
> Therefore I tried to use linux video studio - and fa
> *nod* This does not seem to be the same problem as you experienced with
> your camera, although some of the effect is similar.
There are evidently several problems that have similar looking
visual effects.I think Dan Scholnik's camcorder Y/C
Hi Dan,
> I will keep an eye on my videos and see if I can catch it in the act
> again, and post here if I work out the cause or fix.
Yes please do... it would be really useful to have a sequence that shows the
effect. It sounds like it could be a Bug in the internal inverse
Quantisation routi
Hi -
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 22:39:54 2003
> > Hmmm, the common problem mentioned has been "splotches of grey" in low
> > light scenes - hadn't heard 'ghosting' mentioned before.
>
> That's the same problem, just differently described. If you look at each
> individual P or B frame, th
20 matches
Mail list logo
