On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:00:08PM +0200, Zsolt KOZAK wrote: > On 2003-06-04 11:36, Dirk wrote: > > >Hi all. Can anyone explain me why lavrec doesn't work very well with the > >"at" command? > > > What do you mean under "doesn't work very well"? Could you explain it? > Lots of inserted and deleted frames. When I use directly from commandline there are hardly any inserted or deleted frames.
> >It doesn't matter if I use a script with a lavrec command or > >if I use the lavrec command directly with at. > > > >Lavrec does exactly what I want except scheduling a capture doesn't > >work. (very well) > > > > > > > > > I have a script for capturing with lavrec also and I regularly use this > script with at. This "script" contanins only one line, a properly > configured lavrec line, so it is not a big thing. ;-) > That sounds like what I have. > Dou you set the channel with -C switch properly? Do you use -t switch > for setting the capturing time? > I use v4lctl for setting the channel and -t for a recording time. Ah, that's another thing, lavrec doesn't stop recording once it was started by "at". BTW, I have a debian woody system, maybe this matters? Dirk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
