Le Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:21:10 -0400
Matto Marjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
[...]
> Thank you, and thanks for the independent testing. (The 'box' filter
> has a couple of issues still, but who really wants the box filter? :)
Yes, the box filter output is very ugly. Also notice that the linear and
quadratic scalers are the fastest on my hardware (box is called "the
fastest" in the y4mscaler manpage).
[...]
> The "time:" numbers in your test pictures, what is being measured?
> What is the length of the input (in frames or seconds), and on what
> type of hardware is the stuff running?
The "time" number is for time consumed to encode the input sample,
who has 1500 frames. Have a 800 MHz PIII Coppermine.
I've updated results pictures. Now "time" and "filesize" are ranked,
and also removed useless resample filter for SVCD test.
Cheers,
Nicolas
P.S. : y4mscaler show me "0.05p0" version number, not "0.5.0" !
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
