fwiw, i had uvm_mapent_alloc terrors a while back, which have been
nonpresent since the july 14th 2008 snapshots
--
jared
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Bj??rn Ketelaars wrote:
> > viq wrote:
> > > Sorry for the "carpet bombing", I grabbed the list of people who I saw
> > > report problems with rtorrent.
> > >
> > > I'm writing to ask those
cri
on jul 11 snapshots now, have gone thru i think 2 or 3 snapshot iterations
since ~early/mid june.
first recorded/noticed incident of the
'uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries' jobby was jun.16th while
running a DEBUG.MP kernel i had made in attempt to catch more info on a
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:54:34PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> At 05:23 PM 7/16/2008 -0400, William Boshuck wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:42:15PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
>> >
>> > I always do my homework,
>>
>> Is the following mindless word-drool about 'put startx into rc'
>> an examp
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:13:14PM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> on jul 11 snapshots now, have gone thru i think 2 or 3 snapshot iterations
> since ~early/mid june.
cracked out again hardcore a bit ago (when it shits out it seems accurate
to call it a deadlock), so
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:53:24PM -0400, jmc wrote:
> --- John Nietzsche [Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:19:11PM -0300]: ---
> > Dear OpenBSD friends,
> >
> > how may i format a slice with FFS2? and what to put into /etc/fstab
> IIRC from some list traffic, you have to be careful what filesystems you
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:15:50PM -0401, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:13:14PM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> >
> > on jul 11 snapshots now, have gone thru i think 2 or 3 snapshot iterations
> > since ~early/mid june.
>
> cracked o
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:38:48PM -0400, William Graeber wrote:
> I have managed to gain a bit more information regarding my problem - I
> added an echo statement in /etc/netstart to get a copy of the command
> which was being run.
netstart, if has no args, runs thru the whole hostname/bridgena
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:05:51AM -0400, William Graeber wrote:
> The up doesn't make a difference if I add it before the inet line
:(
> output of sh -v /etc/netstart is pretty lengthy, but I can post it
> somewhere if someone would like to take a look.
output of that is probably no differ
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:45:31PM +0200, Michael wrote:
>
> Too bad I can't go back to my old snapshot, or is there any chance to
> get the 4.0 packages before official release so I can downgrade to a
> working state?
ja;
cvs -qd${your_favourite_cvs_mirror}:/cvs co -r OPENBSD_4_0_BASE
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:15:21PM +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:50:41 +0200, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> >hier(7) says:
> man 7 hier
oops.
> Do we look from up over?
i don't know if you look like a mop that had been pissed in.
> Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:50:46AM +1100, nuffnough wrote:
> I have an OpenBSD 3.9 box and I've been asked to configure it to terminate a
> VPN using AES-256 encryption with SHA authentication, DH Group 5 (rather
> than the default group 2) and a lifetime of one day. I configured my
> isakmpd.conf
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:46:35PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>
> So, I see absolutely nothing wrong with this, but only huge benefit.
with the "not" wildcard stuff, it seems like that would perhaps be
a bit heavier to implement than the "definately is" matching.
grep vs. egrep, only for
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 05:07:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
<...>
> /var/named/etc/named.conf
> [...]
> listen-on {
> localhost;
> 80.237.156.59;
> };
>
> //listen-on-v6 { any; };
> [...]
did you make sure that /etc/hosts isn't the reason fo
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:44:46PM -0500, Michael Lockhart wrote:
> Looking for thoughts on improving performance, throughput, etc. I'm
> leaning towards just throwing up 2 better boxes with 2GB of ram and
> P4's. Wish I could show the pf.conf rules but that's out of the
> question.
if sanitiz
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:50:54AM +1100, nuffnough wrote:
> On 11/9/06, jared r r spiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> No Phase one. Just a packet to initiate, then a packet back to say that
> the far end doesn't like me. Debug on the other end indicated that wh
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:35:56PM -0500, ICMan wrote:
>
> Thank you everyone. I discovered that ulimit -d 20 works on my
> system. I don't really know what that means, and I have yet to figure
> out how to set this for all users (so they can use java), but that's
> stuff I can puzzle out.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:53:04AM -0600, Will Maier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:35:27PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> >
> > I read a lot of documentation on the utilities for managing
> > packages on NetBSD, where /usr/pkg/etc is used. I expected the
> > same behaviour on OpenBSD.
>
> W
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:43:48PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update. I understand that. Not a complain what so ever,
> but just a thought that may be the man page should include the default
> of 800 to be also the max allow.
jmc@ took care of that 2w ago
--
jared
working on getting a dual core dual cpu 64b 2MB cache
xeon 2.8GHz w/12GB RAM and dual copper em(4) put
in place in front of our MX vip for a greylisting spamd(8).
i've got a similar machine with faster CPU ( 3.0 GHz / 4MB )
but it "only" has 4GB of RAM with 4.0 installed on it now
tha
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 07:43:05AM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
>
> AFAIK, amd64 does not support >4GB, unless that
> patch from tech@ somehow sneaked into the tree without me noticing.
this one?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=114498992417267&w=2
it's not in -current. i'
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 04:07:16PM +0100, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a system (dell 1950) with 4GB ram. OpenBSD (amd64) only detects:
> real mem = 3488907264 (3407136K)
> avail mem = 2990874624 (2920776K)
>
> bios detects all 4 GB's.
> kernel is GENERIC.MP.
>
> Is it possible to use
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:11:29PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
>
>http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldBinary
>
> "The first step in building from source is to make sure you have the
> closest available binary installed."
>
> Upgrade by binary, then build -stable.
that really does make
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:27:52PM -0600, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> to save ppl the time of reading the entire mail, i'm having
> failure crop up when an ipcomp packet does a very good
> ratio of compression, it doesn't get decompressed on the
> receiving end,
i can't recall if this has been discussed anywhere
before, but i remember trying to use ipcomp a few years
ago and i think i had the same pitfall happen; but
i'm not sure what came of it.
to save ppl the time of reading the entire mail, i'm having
failure crop up when an ipcomp packet
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 08:02:22PM -0600, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> note, i setup the 192.168.7.17 <-> 192.168.7.18 testcase due
> to initially seeing the issue against a remote host, and then
> trying to duplicate with a simple case.
>
> also, the following c
i'll be getting a few hifns soon, and then
i will try to duplicate the issue using -comp lzs.
also, i can try installing some linux and seeing
if the decompressing host duplicates it if either
side is a linux.
i am hoping i am just setting up the ipcomp CPIs/flows
wrong, but am at t
in the hopes that i'm not just spitting random
nonsense and wasting everyone's time, i upgraded
to -current snapshot:
OpenBSD 3.7-current (GENERIC) #164: Sun May 29 17:28:51 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
brought /usr/src up to speed with "
on a whim, i tried IPv6, but he says:
===
ipcomp_init(): initialized TDB with ipcomp algorithm Deflate
ipcomp_output(): unknown/unsupported protocol family 24, IPCA
2001:0470:1f01:0245:0007:e9ff:fe08:d1fc/
===
so it correctly determines whether to send an ipcomp packet or not,
but
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:17:30AM -0500, kevin wrote:
>
> I was downloading GNU gcc on a machine and when I looked over
> after the download, the screen was writing:
> "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
i know there's an xscreensaver for that.
since you said specifically c
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:31:05AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've a question related to newfs_msdos.
>
> I bought a USB-Stick and formated it (FAT32) but I'm still limited to the
> 8.3 DOS-Style for the filenames.
>
> Maybe I'm wrong but MS Windows 98 wich was able to use FAT32 was able t
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:50:10PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> AFAIK it was not yet tested. I'm not sure if it will work because the enc
> interface is not a real interface. I know it works over gre tunnels.
> Using the enc device may work but I'm not sure about it (until now I never
> had to
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:49:47AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> I *would* like to see some pictures of a keylogger chip installed in a
> keyboard.
also might be a good idea to find some pictures of the
underside of a keyboard.
phillips head screws and all...
for me, it's time to edi
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:38:15PM -0700, Winston Williams wrote:
>
> OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 Debian-8.sarge.4, OpenSSL 0.9.7e 25 Oct 2004
> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
> debug1: Connecting to tigl [207.114.###.###] port 22.
> debug1: Connection established.
> debug1: identity f
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:29:59AM -0700, Michael Favinsky wrote:
> So if I'm using CARP, do I create separate CARP interfaces and VHIDs for
> 192.0.2.4 and 192.0.2.5? Or can one CARP interface have multiple VHIDs
> assigned to it?
don't know if you an hve multiple VHIDs, but you can have multip
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:01:43PM +0200, Abel Talaversn Estevez wrote:
>
> Is it normal? Can I solve it with a parameter like "Retransmit" or "Timeout"?
> I know that it happens something similar with D-Link Firewalls.
need configs to answer accurately, please.
shouldn't need to dinker wi
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Abel Talaversn Estevez wrote:
>
> [General]
> Exchange-max-time= 30
> Check-interval= 30
> DPD_check_interval= 30
if you're certain those are what you need to use for
one reason or another, then you need to use them :), but
> I've been tryin
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >Perhaps it'd be an improvement to spamd to report to the client on how
> >it got decided to block or greylist the IP, as that can come quite handy
> >if debugging is needed (i.e. legitimate mail doesn't get through even
> >after
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:49:39PM -0500, Rene Rivera wrote:
>
> bash-3.00# mount_nfs -2 192.168.0.3:/export /mnt/export.3
> mount_nfs: /mnt/export.3: Protocol not supported
> bash-3.00# mount_nfs -2 -T 192.168.0.3:/export /mnt/export.3
> mount_nfs: /mnt/export.3: Protocol not supported
> bash-3.0
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:33:07PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> I'd have to check to know for sure, but I think having a swap
> partition on the root disk is mandatory. But you can always add extra
> swap partitions later.
i got away with installing a "full-disk" / when i was doing a
soe
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:45:29AM -0700, Timothy Horie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to rebuild my /etc/mail/aliases file after changing it but it
> isn't working.
does it work if you back out your changes?
> Can someone give me some hints? The aliases.db file isn't supposed to be
> 0 byte
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 02:21:09PM -0700, Golliher, Blake wrote:
>
> I've changed the raidframe.conf to reflect the change, but that didn't
> work, unless I missed something. I still get a message about a hosed
> raid device. I think the raidlabels contain some disk id information,
> and I'll ne
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:39:36PM -0700, Golliher, Blake wrote:
> So I can get the serial number, but I'm not sure how to change anything
> on the raidlabel.
was wondering if the situation you're in is if you didn't get
the physical drives in the same logical order for the component
raid s
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:34:10AM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
>
> I've googled and read TFA, but couldn't find anything with this scenario.
at the moment, seems you would have to come up with
something hackish. doesn't look like spamd has a facility for
communicating its database to peers
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 04:06:42AM -0400, Mike Schreckengost wrote:
> Hello all,
>I have recently installed OpenBSD 3.7-current (as of 07/12/05) and have
> selected the bsd.mp kernel since I am running a system with 2 CPUs. After
> looking at the dmesg output after the initial boot, I noticed
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:28:32AM -0400, Brandon Mercer wrote:
> I've tried running the debug, but I
> can't figure out which part of the proposal is incompatible. My config has:
when i had to setup a tunnel against a speedstream 5930 ( dsl modem/router ),
i told the speedstream to make an
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:54:46AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:20:33 +0100, Simon Farnsworth
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday 16 August 2005 06:34, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> >> You seem to be confused on your terms. The term "PPPoA" means
> >> Point-to-Point Protoco
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:55:50PM -0600, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> take a phone cord coming in and an ethernet cord going out.
>
> it's possible
>
> i suppose
> there could be a
please forget this train of thought.
> > it may be possible to use OpenB
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:24:02PM +0100, Marcel Prisi wrote:
>
> I read some old threads about too small tcp.sendspace / tcp.recvspace in
> 3.4 time that used to hit performance so I thought it would be useful.
of all the times i dicked with those, my results have been that
any performance
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:03:40AM -0600, Gordon Grieder wrote:
> sees the card OK but
> won't use it. Quick script to turn userland crypto off and on with
> benchmarks proves that.
>
<...>
>
> Here's a dmesg for both, any advice or direction is appreciated.
including the commandlines of said b
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:29:47PM -0600, Gordon Grieder wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:07:30PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> >
> > including the commandlines of said benchmarks would have been hot,
> > in this case.
>
> The speed with and without user
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:12:59AM -0500, Paolo Supino wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to setup an IPSEC VPN between 2 locations. 1 location runs
> Cisco gear (out of my control) and the other runs OpenBSD (my decision).
depending on whether this is relevant to your needs or not, vpnc
from ports(/s
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 05:59:23PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 07:43:46PM +0300, Alex B wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > When started from user, tcpdump complains: "need root privileges", even if I
> > want it to read packets from regular file.
> > Error is located in privsep
OPENBSD_3_8 from sources grabbed mar.2.
kernel config:
==
$ diff -u GENERIC.MP GENERIC.MP.RAID
--- GENERIC.MP Sun May 1 03:54:20 2005
+++ GENERIC.MP.RAID Sun Mar 26 21:45:32 2006
@@ -9,3 +9,6 @@
cpu* at mainbus?
ioapic*at mainbu
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 06:43:38AM +, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I built a release from the OPENBSD_3_9 cvs sources a few days ago and
> installed them on my soekris gate, a net 4801 with a soekris 1411 mini-pci
> vpn card.
>
> When I ssh to the soekris host or I ssh from my soekris box
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 09:31:01AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
>
> Wow! This was not the impression I got from
>
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/tftp-hpa
>
> which says
>
> -
> HPA's tftp client
>
> This is a tftp client derived from OpenBSD tftp with some extra
> opti
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:11:49PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> i forgot 'show panic' and 'show registers' these three times.
ddb{0}> show panic
the kernel did not panic
ddb{0}> show registers
ds 0x10
es
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:40:24AM +0200, mickey wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 12:54:16AM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:11:49PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> > >
> > > i forgot 'show panic' and 'show registers&#
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:36:55PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> >
> > When I ssh to the soekris host or I ssh from my soekris box to another one,
> > I get disconnected with the following message: "corrupted mac on input". It
> > happens on a inregular bas
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 11:25:37AM +0200, Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 11:01:03AM +0200, Stefan Sczekalla-Waldschmidt wrote:
>
> > Whaa Isakmpd-debug-level Options should I set to get a better glue what
> > ist happening ?
this is not perfect, but when i am having trouble,
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 02:52:01PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yet another example for what happens when people use BLOBs (it's *so*
> convenient):
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/UPDATING?rev=1.307&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
either i'm missing something, or
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:38:13PM +0200, knitti wrote:
> On 4/9/06, Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would be nice to know about when it's to be released so I can
> > decide if I should use the "old" GNU CVS or if I should wait for a
> > public stable release.
>
> Everything one could rea
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:11:59PM +0200, Michael wrote:
>
> I read about the file /etc/mk.conf in which you can disable compile
> options. These options will then apply to the src and the portstree.
i found that things such as turning off YP and AFS are just a bit
of a nuisance in the form
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:42:09PM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
>
> ---My modifications to syslog.conf---
> !spamd
> daemon.err;daemon.warn;daemon.info /var/log/spamd
>
when you:
$ sed -ne '/spamd/l' /etc/syslog.conf
do you have
!spamd\n$
daemon.err;daemon.warn;daemon.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:12:19PM -0600, Chris Cameron wrote:
> In my pf.conf I have:
>
> set skip on tun0
> set skip on enc0
> set skip on lo0
<...>
>
> The connection attempt in my pflog:
>
> Apr 13 14:03:37.157867 rule 0/(match) block in on tun0:
> 192.168.123.6.1160 > 192.168.120.50.23: S 6
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 08:31:18AM -0600, David Wilk wrote:
> I've got a test server with OpenBSD-3.8 on it (GENERIC except with
> RAIDFRAME support) and considering the hardware, it does pretty well
> with NFS performance. However, I've noticed that when under heavy NFS
> load, it becomes nearly
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:36:00PM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> Anyone running interesting sensorsd.conf files that they would like to
> share with the list?
> I don't see a lot of examples out there.
> What actions are you having sensord performs? Are most people just
> sending to syslog and u
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:57:42AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Btw: I talked about synergy-effects wich would be provide an advantage for
> all Servers. If you don`t know what synergy is and if that`s the reason
> why you can`t stop bitching you may wanna visit the school again
>
> Th
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:21:41PM +1200, josh wrote:
> Hello...
>
> Some people seem to think that installing a compiler inherently makes
> their system less secure... despite never being able to cite any actual
> reasons why.
i had a machine get compromised once; now we don't have a compiler
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:33:48AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> i am not asserting that the compromise-pack did not have
> a precompiled sshd binary for openbsd ( the prior hop
> up the compromise chain in this case was a debianlinux ),
> but if it didn't, it
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:49:07PM +0100, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 02/05/06, jared r r spiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > if we didn't have that little PIII/450 sitting next to the
> > machine now, for the purposes of bringing live, getting
>
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:01:49PM -0401, Ray Lai wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:26:37PM +, Tan Dang wrote:
> > Any reason why www.openbsd.org displays Japanese by default now?
woot! maybe it's there so you get into the habit of using
mirrors for the www also.
--
jared
[ openbs
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:24:14PM +0200, Javier Sol?rzano wrote:
>
> uhidev0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0
> uhidev0: Cambridge Silicon Radio BlueCore, rev 1.10/9.01, addr 2,
> iclass 3/1
> ukbd0 at uhidev0: 8 modifier keys, 6 key codes
> wskbd1 at ukbd0 mux 1
> uhidev1 at uhub0 p
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:35:32PM +0200, Lasse Bach wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm installing 3.9 on my soekris 4801.
> I'm installing on new IBM travelstar harddrive.
>
> I't makes som strange errors? Can anyone enlighten me?
> Is it just a bad harddrive?
<...>
> wd0(pciide0:0:0): timeout
> t
> Dag Richards wrote:
> > Am I correct in inferring ( not assuming no! ) that once a carp iface is
> > created we can not add aliases to them?
i can from here
> > fw1:root:/etc #ifconfig carp1
> > carp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > description: virtual if for all internal traffic
> >
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:37:13PM +0100, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
>
> I don't want to put the entire /home partition into the chroot, that
> leaves everybody's files vulnerable if apache/php gets haxored. I
> could just keep each users websites folder in the chroot, but then
> sftpd or ftpd (b
===
[/home/jrrs] $ uname -mrpsv
OpenBSD 3.9 GENERIC.MP#690 i386 AMD Athlon(tm) MP 2800+ ("AuthenticAMD"
686-class, 512KB L2 cache)
[/home/jrrs] $ echo $KSH_VERSION
@(#)PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2
[/home/jrrs] $ ls -l $(which ksh)
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root bin 324128 May 1 20:28 /bin/ksh
===
if i star
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:28:26AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> i have half a mind that says otto@/kili@/ckuthe will come down
> and cluestick me about why what i am seeing is expected behaviour,
> but the other half expects this to be not what should be happening.
the
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:59:13PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> How about this? If I see things correctly, the ATEMP allocation should
> be cleaned up automatically Running a little test loop does not
> show a leak. Both bugs are fixed, and array entries are nice integer vals.
>
<...>
>
>
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:40:47PM +0200, Paulo Rodriguez wrote:
>
> .
>
> # pas on re0 from any \ #
> # to any port 59#
>
> .
>
> is it expected behavior that pfctl complains about a space after the
> backs
> >On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:07:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> # pas on re0 from any \ #
> # to any port 59#
> >[...]
> >>> i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
> >>> as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
> >[...]
>
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:25:59PM -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
> I just pulled down ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/ports.tar.gz
>
> and it too contains only clamav-0.88 not clamav-0.88.2
iirc that's -release, not -stable
checked a few of the others in that pkg-stable.html, and
the versions
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 12:18:51AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins
> ioapic0: conflicting map entries for pin 0
> ioapic0: pin 19 shares different IPL interrupts (40..90), degraded performance
>
> I don't quite understand what it mean
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:01:21PM -0600, Breen Ouellette wrote:
>
> A few months ago, Didier Wiroth posted to this list that his net4801 with
> a vpn1411 was giving him 'Corrupted MAC on input' errors. He was looking
> for a solution to this problem.
i think i chimed in on that one.
since i
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:23:09PM -0500, Doug Carter wrote:
> I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 on a Dell 1850. A fine list of hardware
> sensors and their current readings is given by sysctl -a; does
> anyone have a cross reference from this list to the actual hardware
> components in the Dell 1850
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:39AM -0600, Breen Ouellette wrote:
>
> Thanks for your post. I hope you take it one step further and run that
> script (and then report your result to this list)! :)
i just run worms(6) or rain(6) in a screen(1) window and then set it
to monitor for 30s silenc
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:32:22PM -0600, Breen Ouellette wrote:
> Didier Wiroth wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Hmm I get the "corrupted mac" error again on current, while
> >connecting to the net4801 with windows + putty.
> >
> >Connecting with openbsd ssh client does not produce the error, I only
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:23:40PM -0700, Winston wrote:
> I have tried the following command to get the hw crypto to work:
> openssl speed des-cbc -engine cryptodev
> But the result I got is pretty much the same if I don't specify the
> cryptodev engine.
> The crypto card I have is hifn7956.
> I t
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:58:31PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> yes, it was removed a little while ago. you can get the same
> functionality from openssl(1) req. see also isakmpd(8).
i checked on the isakmpd(8), it gives an example how to make
a subjectAltName extension field using IP or
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:31:36PM +0200, Vincent Immler wrote:
>
> What does this output mean? Is someone able to explain this output to me?
>
> /* not copying files*/
> soekris# vmstat -i | grep hifn
> irq11/hifn0397322 488
>
> /* start to copying files via SFTP*/
> so
i've been trying to write an isakmpd.conf for two peers to establish
IPsec after using x509 certs for Phase 1. each peer has a copy of the
CA cert in /etc/isakmpd/ca, has their own public cert in /etc/isakmpd/certs,
and their private key in /etc/isakmpd/private. i used the procedure
doc
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:25:52AM -0600, jared r r spiegel wrote:
mis-format on the two configs, please split them thus:
> -[peer a]
> [general]
> #default-phase-1-id=id1hklocal
>
> [phase 2]
> connections=cx
>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 03:18:24PM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> That's probably a quick one:
>
> mtu - IPheader - TCPheader = max-mss?
>
> E.g. for ethernet:
>
> 1500 - 20 - 20 = 1460?
i use the max-mss like this:
scrub on $t all fragment reassemble reassemble tcp no-df random
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:51:31PM +0200, Adam Papai wrote:
>
> Ahh! I re-read your post. I know your problem. Sometimes ATI cards do
> this. I don't know why. But if you type startx again "blind" then your
> screen will probaby come back. It's the same with every Xorg and
> XFree86. Sometimes
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:12:07AM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Steve Williams wrote:
>
> >Jason Dixon wrote:
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet mail.domain.com 25
> >>Trying x.x.x.x...
> >>Connected to mail.domain.com (x.x.x.x).
> >>Escape character is '^]'.
> >>220
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:23:01PM +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> >
> >> Any clues/ things to try? I am a bit worried about the build #137 as
> >> that's pretty close to release but I haven't heard anybody else
> >> reporting problems and the archi
oh yeah, my dmesg fwiw:
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC) #137: Thu Sep 1 17:41:20 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by National Semi ("Geode by NSC"
586-class) 267 MHz
cpu0: FPU,TSC,MSR,CX8,CMOV,MMX
cpu0: TSC disabled
real mem = 13
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:50:55AM -0400, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
>
> of course the easiest solution being lpd(8).
> no need to install no stinky pkg!
before someone fails to check the archives and receives STFA:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=105365665315880&w=2
jared
-
hurricane electric has that IPv6 thing where they'll
bgp with you so you can get their view of IPv6 internet.
tried it a while ago (~3.6?) with openbsd bgpd and it
would bomb on me complaining of unsupported capability.
tried it on sep.1 current and same thing.
when i watch tcpdump,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:17:04AM -0300, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using OpenBSD 3.7 with pf and bridge enabled for a transparent
> proxy, and I'm having some packet loss somewhere in this bridge, since
> netstat -ni doesn't give me any ierrors
what about pkts? does the i
101 - 200 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
