Re: rdr on bridge interface possible? (squid transparent proxy on bridge)

2007-05-04 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 5/4/07, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I now would like to throw squid into the mix acting as a transparent proxy. I have the squid-transparent port installed. If I change the ... I have tried everything I can think of to get this to work in bridge mode to no avail. I have net.

Re: very weak bridge performance

2007-05-15 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 5/15/07, Peter Hessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :bridging is layer 2 and has nothing to do with net.inet.ip.forwarding=1. :The problem is more somewhere deep inside the bridging code. One possible :problem could be a to small interface queue but I could be totaly wrong. :If nobody beats me I

Re: semi transparent spamd-bridge

2007-06-06 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 6/6/07, Christoph Schneeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> case 1: src host is whitelisted, connection is allowed to 1.1.1.35, >> everything works fine. >> case 2: src host is grey-/blacklisted and therefor redirected to >> 127.0.0.1, in this case i get just a timeout when i try to telnet to

Re: transparent bridge: packets not traversing

2007-07-31 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 7/30/07, Karl R. Balsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hey there, -I messed with this alot in 3.0 when it came out and think I > was the first person to ask Dan about it when testing was going on for > 3.0 snapshot. I mean, I lived to wake up and make bridges with pf. > -but, alas, that was ye

Re: Editing C with...

2008-05-07 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 5/6/08, Emilio Perea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although I've never had to deal with Vista, previous versions of Windows > had a "Resource Kit" available which includes vi. With some Vista > versions you can install SUA (Subsystem for UNIX Applications) which > includes tcsh and ksh with v

Re: "dhcpd-sync not in /etc/services"

2008-05-21 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 5/21/08, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Misc@, > Just update the kernel and userland from openbsd.de, and got the following > message.. > myNiceMachine# dhcpd rl0 > dhcpd: Can't find service "dhcpd-sync" in /etc/services > > Anybody can point me where to go? > Best Regards a

Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0

2008-07-16 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 7/16/08, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I for one am glad there is no plugin for that infectious disease called > flash. But then how will I watch "Ow! My balls!" videos online? What will I do? -Mark

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Mark Pecaut
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:19:45PM -0400, Joseph C. Bender wrote: > comments that document who that server belongs to. Gmail is one example > of a particularly frustrating set of mail servers to deal with. Two /24's > (at least that I can recall off the top of my head). And it seems like a >

Re: spamd greylisting and postfix

2005-06-29 Thread Mark Pecaut
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:15:47AM -0400, Roy Morris wrote: > Anyone used spamd greylisting with postfix? I > was on the greylisting site and postfix but didn't > see any configuration examples. spamd does not know or care about which MTA is behind it. The configuration will be exactly the same f

Re: OptiPlex GX620n - OpenBSD

2006-03-06 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Are they suitable to run OpenBSD on them. Here is a dmesg from a GX620. I can report that everything works quite well, including X. OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #9: Thu Mar 2 09:35:17 MST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/comp

Re: OptiPlex GX620n - OpenBSD

2006-03-08 Thread Mark Pecaut
On 3/7/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You prompted me to go back and take another shot at X on a Optiplex 620. > I've (again) had no luck getting it to work with the standard, > on-board video. What did you do to configure X on it? (I didn't see an > extra video card in your dmesg