SPAMD legitimate mail statistics

Hi, Is it possible to know how many SMTP legitimate SMTP connections have passed through SPAMD? In a setup like, no rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from to any port smtp rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port smtp \ -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd Can I assume the number of evaluations of

legitimate mail messages passing through SPAMD

Hi, I posted a question earlier, but I guess I was not clear. I have a firewall running OpenBSD 4.2 and SPAMD to block spams. I would like to know how many legitimate email messages SPAMD is letting in. The default spamd setup that comes in pf.conf is no rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from to any por

brute force voip QoS

Hi, I would like to know if this is possible and how, regardless of what happenned with other applications. I would like to setup PF so that, whenever an initial voip flow was detetcted, all other non relevant traffic would be blocked, and normal packet flow being restored only after some voip id

Re: brute force voip QoS

Hi, Thanks for your insights. > - Original Message - > From: scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1. Your topology: On the "inside" lan, are you hosting clients or > service? So is this an outside-to-inside -or- an inside-to-outside > problem? VoIP Clients. ATAs. This is an inside-to-outside

Re: brute force voip QoS

Hi Stuart and the others, > > pass out queue (std_out,lowdelay) > > here, you place ACKs from downloads at a higher priority than > your voip calls. this is unlikely to be what you want with priq > over a 140Kb/s link.. > > there are some other things you could look at too but changing > this woul

greyscanner syntax error

Hi, I am trying to use the greyscanner within my anti-spam firewall. I installed some of the mentioned packages: # pkg_info gettext-0.14.6p0GNU gettext libiconv-1.9.2p3character set conversion library logsentry-1.1.1p2 logfile auditing tool lsof-4.77p0 list information about op

Re: greyscanner syntax error

Hi, I did forget to mention I am running 4.2 STABLE on a i386 machine. Regards, Jeff. OpenBSD 4.2-stable (GENERIC) #0: Wed Dec 12 16:32:58 BRT 2007 OpenBSD.i386 -- Want an e-mail address like mine? Get a free e-mail account today at www.mail.com!

high load spamd bridge in greylisting mode

Hi, I need to setup a bridge to run spamd in greylisting mode. Since there have been some changes in spamd recently and the ruleset that appeared in the article in the OpenBSD Journal in the past (http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20061108134508) is more appropriate for blacklist mode, I

spamd topology

Hi, Looking at some setups used in the past for spamd, I noticed that many prefer to use a separate internal NIC to connect to each MX instead of using the internal spamd NIC connected to a switch, where all MXs would be, including possibly other sub-domain MXs. Is there anything wrong or inadeq

simple spamd questions

Hi, I am new to OpenBSD and SPAMD, so forgive if I say stupid questions. 1. When run in default mode (greylist), spamd knows the spammers come from blacklists in spamd.conf. But there is no spamd table in PF. How? 2. Is there one way to know how many and which are the blacklisted hosts at the mo

Re: simple spamd questions

Hi, Thank you. Can I assume that all connected/disconnected messages I see in /var/log/daemon are from blacklisted hosts or some are still greylisted (undefined)? Regards, Jeff -- Get a Free E-mail Account at Mail.com! Choose From 100+ Personalized Domains Visit http://www.mail.com today

Re: simple spamd questions

Hi, Thank you very much. > If they are blacklisted, the connected/disconntected message > will name the blacklist(s) they are on. if they are greylisted, there > will be no mention of lists in the log message. For example, from my logs, So if the host is greylisted the connection should not last

spamd inbound

Hi, The default setup in pf.conf makes spamd work on both directions: #no rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from to any port smtp #rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port smtp \ # -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd What is the best way to tell PF that spamd should work only on inbound traffic? Th

dhcp server with 2 interfaces and 2 different subnets

Hi, I am trying to setup a DHCP server on a multi-homed firewall. One of the interfaces is vr0 and should supply addresses 172.16.255.x/24. The other is sk0 and should supply 200.232.140.x/24. My /etc/dhcpd.interfaces looks like sk0 vr0 My /etc/dhcpd.conf looks like shared-network LOCAL-NET {

Re: dhcp server with 2 interfaces and 2 different subnets

, Jeff. - Original Message - From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: "Jeff Santos" Subject: Re: dhcp server with 2 interfaces and 2 different subnets Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:25:24 -0400 (EDT) The following: $ sudo tcpdump -i vr0 "port bootpc || port bootps"

RTM_ADD and RTM_LOSING

Hi, I keep getting these "punt RTM_ADD without gateway" in my /var/log/messages from the routed daemon. Once in a while, I get RTM_LOSING as well. I noticed that, even with a static default route, every now and then I try to ping the default gateway, I get ping: sendto: No route to host. I saw a

Re: RTM_ADD and RTM_LOSING

Hi, Thank you very much. netstat -ni will not show a single error on any of the three interfaces. I do not think it has anything to do with PF, because the problem happens even with a pass quick rule. I use dlink DGE-530T nics and one onboard vr0. sk0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 lladdr 00:13:

Re: RTM_ADD and RTM_LOSING

Hi, > If enough packets are lost to prevent ARP from getting through, you > might see that. Even if I use permanent ARP addresses, the problem continues to happen. One funny thing is that I had a shell window with an active successful ping to ftp.openbsd.org. In another window, after setting PKG

ping: sendto: No route to host

Hi, Other than a hardware problem (interface, switch, cabling, etc.), What could cause such an error? I have an OpenBSD 4.1 station configured as a firewall/router, in which the internal interface has address 200.232.120.1/24 and the external interface has address 200.232.140.3/24. Even when I t

named X route monitor problem

Hi, I am running OpenBSD 4.1 on a firewall/router. For some unknown reason (to me), whenever I start the command nice route monitor after a little while, I begin to get an enormous quantity of messages like: got message of size 104 on ... RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address: len 104, table

Re: ping: sendto: No route to host

OK... I know I did not give enough information to allow people help. So here are some more. The firewall works fine running routed most of the time. It is running 4.1-STABLE (below is a dmesg). I see a lot of interrupts on both internal and external interfaces sk0 and sk1. Something like 3600. T

selective state flush

Hi, Suppose I have an anchor in PF that, when some condition is met, is loaded with a set of block rules. If the condition is met, the connections that were open before these blcok rules were loaded to the anchor are not dropped, correct? If so, is there some way to selectively drop some connect