On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Nick Bender wrote:
> Apologies to most people who won't give a shit but I'm finally moving
> to New Mexico...
This is the sort of thing that gets me thinking really really
seriously again about capital punishment. Who's with me?
--
No no no, my fish's name is
i installed obsd4.5 on a box housing one scsi drive and one IDE drive.
Another unixen is on the IDE.
The install offered me the choice of sd0 or hd0, so I chose sd0.
When I reboot the machine using the boot floppy (floppy45.fs) I cannot
boot the scsi drive. This:
> boot sd0a:/bsd
and many varia
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kenneth R
Westerback wrote:
> Try floppyB or bsd.rd or cdrom. You are probably missing the driver
> for your scsi card. Kinda hard to tell since you have provided no
> information.
I am booting with teh same floppy I used to do the installation. What
do you sugges
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Nick
Holland wrote:
> If you look early on at the boot messages, you probably see something
> like:
> B disk: fd0 hd0*+ hd1+
Exactly that. (Only, since I am now booting from the install CD, there
is a 'cd0' appended.)
> So, you would probably want "boot hd1a:/b
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Nick
Holland wrote:
> Booting from a CD? Not the floppy of the subject: line?
I made a couple of CD's, from the cd45.iso and install45.iso images,
following a suggestion earlier in the thread. So far, with several
re-installs, both from network and CD, I get ide
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
>> Might want to try the boot floppy, and if you have an issue using a
>> boot floppy, try cdemu45.iso (it emulate a boot floppy, so has the
>> boot floppy's /boot).
> Ok, I'll give that a whirl.
No joy.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Nick
Holland wrote:
> MBR problems shouldn't cause the inability to boot
> using a bootloader pulled from floppy (or CD), but the fact the
> system can't boot on its own indicates there's something wrong
> with the installed system, and if that's the case, the flo
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> B The minimal installation just selects a kernel (GENERIC
> B on most platforms), the base set, and the etc set.
> B Note that the minimal choice does not include manual pages.
Bingo. That was it.
I guess I don't thnk of man pages as non-m
What is the rationale for excluding balsa from ports? Some glaring vuln?
Best,
--
No no no, my fish's name is Eric, Eric the fish. He's an halibut. I am
not a looney! Why should I be tarred with the epithet looney merely
because I have a pet halibut?
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Daniel Dickman said,
> Eric, attached is a starting point if you -- or someone else -- want
> to finish the work to get balsa ported over. The patches are quick
> hacks to get it to compile (so you'll need to investigate why it
> doesn't compile and fix properly)
In a fresh install of the new 4.7 release I cvs'd the ports tree and
started to try some builds, but immediately ran into a "can't locate
[...] in @INC" error referencing the Subject file.
This popped in shells/tcsh and also devel/gperf.
Thoughts? Help? (I am back looking at obsd after a long tim
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> but that is current. 4.7 doesn't have it. as in, you have something
> -current in your mix (pbly ports) and mixing release/stable is not
> supported.
So I need a tag in my cvs co command.
I grabbed the missing Build.pm from the web cvs. H
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> the most naive and terrible idea presented here in the last few
> minutes.
I kinda knew that the minute I hit 'Send.'
d/l'ing a new ports tree as I type.
Thanks again,
--
No no no, my fish's name is Eric, Eric the fish. He's an halib
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Over at the TeX Live camp we are wondering if anyone is using the
> binaries found on the DVD distributed by the TeX User Group on OpenBSD?
I haven't used those particular binaries, but in my quest to get a
working DocBook XML -> PDF toolchain
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> we have a few problems here too (using TeX Live in both OpenBSD 4.6
>> and -current, on i386 and amd64); i would suggest sending a detailed
>> bug report to the TeX Live developers at this mailing list:
> Ok, we need to consult upstream. Do y
15 matches
Mail list logo
