Re: multiple relays in smtpd.conf

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:44:47AM +0200, Christian Gut wrote: > Hi List, > > is it possible to have multiple relays (you might want to say smart hosts) in > smtpd? > > I currently use the following line: > > accept from local for any relay via smarthost.example.org >

Re: New lpd server

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:35:01AM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Where can I learn more about the work on the new lpd server aside of > reading the code? I learnt about it from the OpenBSD Journal > > https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20180509184829 > > > Thank you! > Predrag > Th

Re: libasr/libevent question

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 07:41:55PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > I have this trivial program that I keep getting a segfault trying to use > event_asr_run(). I have #if 0'd working code to show my progression from > getaddrinfo() to event_asr_run(). It is hopefully something trivial that I'm > ove

Re: smtpd setup

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 07:31:42PM -0700, Scott wrote: > The initial debug advice I got was helpful, so I thought I'd take the next > step and add relaying to gmail (back to that in a minute), but apparently I > just don't get it still. Rolling back to my previously working setup failed > also, thi

Announce: OpenSMTPD 5.3.3 released

y to secur...@opensmtpd.org Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot and Charles Longeau.

Re: Unable to configure smtpd as backup server

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:54:55AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: > I'm having difficulties configuring smtpd as a backup mail server. > smtpd is running on my main mail server and works a treat. (Good > riddance, sendmail.) > > I've read the man pages and understood them the best I can, and > tri

Re: Slow CD/DVD read time (AMD64 current 4.5 02/19/2009 12:11:00 PM on Intel Q9550, 8GB RAM, 1TB WD)

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:20:07 -0500 David Heinrich wrote: > I'm installing OpenBSD AMD64 current (4.5) as of 12/19/2009 12:11:00 > PM. I am at the step where it says "Getting base45.tgz"..it started > out saying it would require 40 or more minutes and seems to be > transferring data from the CD to

Announce: OpenSMTPD 5.3.1 released

ought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot and Charles Longeau.

Re: smtpd setup

On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:23:35PM -0700, Scott wrote: > Greetings all, > > I was excited to try out smtpd because of future plans to go away from > webmail. Right after installing 5.3 I followed the directions in man smtpd > to make the switch. smtpd.conf is untouched, but here are the values any

Announce: OpenSMTPD 5.4.1 released

d.org/report.html Security bugs should be reported directly to secur...@opensmtpd.org Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot and Charles Longeau. Subject: Announce: OpenSMTPD 5.4.1 released OpenSMTPD 5.4.1 has just been release

Re: Announce: OpenSMTPD 5.4.1 released

With built-in redundancy! :) Too much excitement! Sorry about that. Eric.

Re: libbind - server list

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:36:03AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014-01-12, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > You must use libbind's headers, too: -I/usr/local/include/libbind > > It would probably make sense to apply the diff suggested in that thread > though, as it fixes this case and I don't s

Re: OpenSMTPD exits with value 1 when clients attempd to authenticate

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:44:47PM +0200, Gregor Best wrote: > Hi people, Hi, > I'm running OpenSMTPD 5.4.3 from -current on my private mail server. After a > recent update, using authentication for sending mail cause smtpd to exit with > exit value 1. A (stripped down) configuration that exhibit

Re: sshd segfaults with incomplete /etc/hosts

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:47:19PM +, Florian Obser wrote: > > > Eric? > > > > I think the bug is in hostent_file_match. The following diff has the > > advantage that this works in /etc/hosts: > > > > 192.0.2.1 > > 192.0.2.1 foo > > > > $ getent hosts 192.0.2.1 > > 192.0.2.1 foo > >

Re: OpenSMTPD memory leak...

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:39:43PM +0100, Ivan Nudzik wrote: > Hi, > I'm running OpenBSD5 (all from binaries) as a spam filter installed in > SPARC > LDOM (T1000). I've changed sendmail for OpenSMTPD and after few weeks a see > that OpenSMTPD ate almost all memory: [snip] >

Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 12:01:46 +0100 Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've got a PR database with bugs in it, and we NEVER get fixes from > > outsiders. That's not news to anyone, if they actually wanted to do > > Maybe the outsiders just cannot find the PR database. I put > "openbsd p

Re: Real men don't attack straw men

RMS wrote: > I've been trying for a couple of years to get going a modified version > of Firefox that won't offer to install any non-free plug-ins, but we > don't have enough people to make this work very well. If you would > like to help, please let me know. It is an important project. Hahaha!

Re: Speeding up OBSD bootup

On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 16:08:41 +0200 Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to specify the kernel that the hardware for which there are > drivers probing for but I don't have in my PC is absent? Since OBSD has no > suspend to disk/RAM, the bootup speed is critical when working with

Re: cruxports for OpenBSD

On 6/17/06, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: there is a software called foo suppose 3.9 installs foo.1.1.1 if you use ports. now a few security holes are found in foo.1.1.1 So the foo developers release foo.1.1.2 And the foo developers *strongly encourage* everybody running foo.1.1.1 t

Re: Voice-Chat Software (maybe even a Client wich works on openBSD? ;) ) ?

On 7/13/06, Sebastian Rother <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello everybody, I`m looking for a Voice-Chat/VoIP Solution. You could take a look at shtoom. http://divmod.org/trac/wiki/ShtoomProject I think it has already been mentioned on this list (or ports?). Eric.

Re: OpenBSD WiFi tutorial

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 17:59:00 +0530 "Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a simple tutorial or howto on setting up wireless for OpenBSD? > Especially setting up OpenBSD as a WiFi hub? There is even better: manpages. man ifconfig man Eric.

Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:27:34 +0800 "Edwin Eyan Moragas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > been reading the select(2) man pages and it mentions poll(2) > being more efficient in most cases. this makes it obvious to > discard the use of select(2) in writing new servers. > > i've come across

Re: web development on OpenBSD

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:08:37 +1200 Richard Toohey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I plan to develop a money management app for personal use on > OpenBSD. Since I am not big on any backend /prog.language I have > decided to ask the experts, what should i choose. Based on the > consensus and

Re: port forwarding

On 12/4/06, Bambero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello I have a problem with port forwarding. My "network" looks like this: INERNET <=> [ne3] router (OpenBSD-3.9) [ne4] (192.168.0.1) <=> client (192.168.0.2) I want to forward port of my router [ne3] to port 80 on client machine. I have

very weird random numbers with jot on macppc

I've noted that jot(1) behaviour is erratic on my system (ibook) wrt to random number generation. "jot -r 0" will start generating 1's continuously after a (short) while. It does it even quicker when higher precision is requested. "jot -p 9 0" starts throwing 1.0's after 74 random lines. "

Re: very weird random numbers with jot on macppc

On 5/27/05, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Faurot wrote: > > I've noted that jot(1) behaviour is erratic on my system (ibook) > > wrt to random number generation. > > Not a solution to this interesting problem but if you want to get > real ran

ifconfig not showing ipv6 peer addr on 3.7

When using ppp on 3.7 with IPV6CP, ifconfig does not show the peer ipv6 address on the local link, although it should be there. $ ifconfig tun0 inet6 tun0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::502a:8671%tun0 -> prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 whereas in ppp, after dial: ppp ON myhost> show

Re: ifconfig not showing ipv6 peer addr on 3.7

On 6/1/05, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IPv6 with ppp does not work at the moment. Just in case that "breakage" was not intentional, but a side-effect of other changes in ppp, I can report that it used to work on 3.6. I had to apply this diff http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/20

Re: very weird random numbers with jot on macppc

On 5/31/05, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, after some really deep digging, this commit by Dale Rahn fixes > the problem. > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/powerpc/powerpc/trap.c.diff?r1=1.67&r2=1.68&f=h > > Thanks for the report. I'm glad this can make ope

Re: making packages out of the portstree

On 10/12/05, Marc Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > > i wanted to install a package on an box, which i built out of the > portstree via "make package". everything goes fine and the package is > available in "/usr/ports/packages/i386/cdrom/" and "../ftp/". i copied > the .tgz to the mach

problem with dynamic linking on amd64 or expected behaviour?

Hi, I am stuck on the following dynamic linking problem: python-expat has a pyexpat.so module that contains a complete expat implementation (1.95.8). Now there is the _cairo.so python that depends on libcairo.so and libfreetype.so (found in /usr/X11R6/lib) which in turn is linked to /usr/X11R6/lib

Re: problem with dynamic linking on amd64 or expected behaviour?

oops, I might have spoken a bit too quick: I didn't see the recent ld.so changes and I didn't realize my amd64 snapshot was so old. I'll try with a more recent one. Sorry for the noise. Eric.

Re: openbsd web site design proposals (from HOTO write bad docs)

On 11/28/05, Jeremy David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, simply as a matter of fact, it's actually untrue that the site is > functional. Functional for you? Maybe. For everyone? Not exactly. > > Check this out: > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openbsd.org&charset=%28det >

Re: openbsd web site design proposals (from HOTO write bad docs)

On 11/28/05, Jeremy David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/05, Eric Faurot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/28/05, Jeremy David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The website is hacky, invalid, and broken. > > > > broken? whi

Re: openbsd web site design proposals (from HOTO write bad docs)

On 11/28/05, Jeremy David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just wanted to point that your original argument was wrong. You said "fix > > it because it is broken for people", which is not true. > > I would say that it is. "Broken" doesn't necessarily mean that it > makes your browser crash. When y

Re: openbsd's future plans?

On 2/8/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I cast a vote for re-writing the kernel in Ruby because of it's robust > threads implementation. No no no, OpenBSD should be rewritten with the new GPL v3 as soon as it stabilizes. It seems much more robust than the previous releases, and it i

Re: smtpd - strange names in maillog

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:39:46PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > Through my smtpd, I am sending an email to an address > in the fjfi.cvut.cz domain. The email get delivered alright, > but the maillog message is strange: > > Jun 13 19:32:08 mini smtpd[7138]: 93fe4a4f: from=, > size=427, nrcpts=1, prot

Re: smtpd - strange names in maillog

Can you try this diff instead? Eric. Index: sockaddr.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/sockaddr.c,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -u -r1.4 sockaddr.c --- sockaddr.c 16 May 2011 10:57:41 - 1.4 +++ sockaddr.c 14 J

smtpd alias expansion updated, please test

Hi, I have just commited a rather deep change to the alias expansion logic in smtpd. It fixes a bug reported by halex@ in virtual maps, where an alias expanding to two different virtual users would end up being sent only to the first one. Alias expansion is tricky. We want to make sure that the

Re: If I install OpenBSD 4.9, when will I have to upgrade to 5.0?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:25:53AM -0700, lancebaynes87 wrote: > This is starting to get funny. > > The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the > different versions security support time. No kidding? http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors You are linked directly

Re: Installer bug? - Upgrade 4.6 to 4.7 failed to upgrade base47, on i386 and amd64

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:55:53PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:41 PM, patrick keshishian wrote: > > > you mean applying the errata47.html patches? If so, are you certain > > your source tree is tagged OPENBSD_4_7 and not anything else? > > Do I understand you correctly? I

Re: pf.conf reassemble and antispoof questions

On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 10:07:51AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Robert Waite [2009-11-05 20:08]: > > I have been on OBSD 4.4 for a bit and had not really messed with pf.conf for > > a while. > > > > When I updated to 4.6 there were a couple of settings that seemed > > ambiguous to me. > > >