Re: The kernels of *BSD include nonfree firmware blobs?

's) how acurate this statement looks nowadays. You would get a much more interesting discussion, but please ask it in the proper lists, individually. -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br

OpenBGP: announcing network to different peers

Hello, I have a /20 and I want a announce half of it to peer21 and the other half to peer2 only. How am I expected to do so? Using filters? Can anyone please mention a working example? -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br

Re: OpenBGP: announcing network to different peers

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:27:42PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a /20 and I want a announce half of it to peer21 and the other >> half to peer2 only. How am I expected to do so? Using filte

OpenBGP - iBGP peers not announcing after 3 hops

l sh rib det nei iBGP1". Any suggestions on what might be going wrong? -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br

Re: OpenBGP - iBGP peers not announcing after 3 hops

Really? It's difficult for me in this environment, do I have another option? On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Florian Obser wrote: > > > On 02/04/2013 03:59 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am facing a strange behavior, > > > > I have

Re: OpenBGP - iBGP peers not announcing after 3 hops

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Peter Hessler wrote: > make iBGP2 a route server. > Sounds promising, what are the key configurations in bgpd.conf to do so? So I can look further. Are we talking 'bout reflector/collector? > > On 2013 Feb 04 (Mon) at 13:32:43 -0200 (-020

Re: OpenBGP - iBGP peers not announcing after 3 hops

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013-02-04, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > >> On 02/04/2013 03:59 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I am facing a strange behavior, > >> > > >> > I

Re: the balance between OpenBSD and life

ty drops... So, in the end, what are you? And what's you real problem, you think you are putting too much or to little time on OpenBSD? What's there to adjust? -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br

OpenBSD as a router on Oracle T5120

tweaks should I look for? Is this performance expected to be so low on this machine? I got much better numbers w/ OpenBSD on i386 servers. Thank you for any hint ]:) -- === Eduardo Meyer

Re: OpenBSD as a router on Oracle T5120

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Eduardo Meyer [dudu.me...@gmail.com] wrote: > > hello, > > > > I am doing some basic testings on the above mentioned scenario and I am > > stuck on some limits which I consider to be very low: I cannot get more

Re: OpenBSD as a router on Oracle T5120

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Le Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:59:02 -0200, > Eduardo Meyer a écrit : > > > hello, > > > > I am doing some basic testings on the above mentioned scenario and I > > am stuck on some limits which I consider to b

OpenBGP "state change OpenSent -> Active, reason: Connection closed" trouble

tryTimer: due in 00:01:51 Interval: 120s HoldTimer: due in 00:03:51 Interval: 240s KeepaliveTimer: not running Interval:80s Local host: 201.87.225.16, Local port: 61684 Remote host: 200.184.196.18, Remote port: 179 -- === Eduardo Meyer

Re: OpenBGP "state change OpenSent -> Active, reason: Connection closed" trouble

On Jan 16, 2008 11:43 AM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008/01/16 11:17, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > > I am setting up OpenBGP for the first time in replacement to Cisco. > > However, I am having some troubles which I could not realize the > > reason my

Re: OpenBGP "state change OpenSent -> Active, reason: Connection closed" trouble

On Jan 16, 2008 1:15 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008/01/16 12:33, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > > I have lowered holdtime for testing purposes only. With default value > > the behavior is the same. I have just forced local-address to another > &g

OpenBGP - Saving & Restoring routes, possible?

Can I do this? -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenBGP - Saving & Restoring routes, possible?

On Feb 18, 2008 5:39 PM, NetOne - Doichin Dokov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eduardo Meyer NAPISA: > > Hello, > > > > I have setup OpenBGP doing full routing with 3 other peers, so I get > > around 240k routes from each peer. But if by some reason I have to

OpenBGP - Balancing between peers

, those outbound traffic? Whould I use "weight"? Examples are also appreciated. Thank you again. -- ======= Eduardo Meyer pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenBGP - Balancing between peers

and with localpref I could make it go via 18881. However, I need to balance it in the adequated ratio, say, make 40% of outgoing traffic to 4230 go via 1881 while 60% goes out via 17379. If you could point me to what to read, or suggest anything, thats what I need, some words from the experi

Re: offloading layer 7 packet classification to hardware

> layer 7 packet classification with hardware accelerators such as >> sensory networks's hyperscan ? > > unlikely, because PF does not do layer 7 packet classification. -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

OpenBGP: 3 doubts regarding localpref, rib out and announcement

is the cause of non-reannouncement on "announce all" desired behavior. However its still dont get announced to my peers. I tried things like: allow to $my_inner_peer community $cymruas:888 But they did not work. Any other suggestions? Thank you. -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br

Re: OpenBGP: 3 doubts regarding localpref, rib out and announcement

nt [1] and uncomment [2] the rule wont match. [1] always match fine... In fact I tested a number o rules and nome with "match to .. set X" worked, when I am dealing with a prefix I got from someone else (not announced by be). What am I missing? -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br

OpenBGP bgpctl(8) asdot / 4byte-asn

Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using asdot format? I am trying to convert my OpenBGP conf to RPSL but the later is old enough that wont accept as-dot format, therefore I need it in 4-byte ASN notation. Thanks. -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me

Re: OpenBGP bgpctl(8) asdot / 4byte-asn

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer wrote: >> Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using >> asdot format? > > Not at present, OpenBGP only accepts as-plain for input, it always > outputs as-do

OpenBGP Filter - Selectively Announcing by Peer.

ve OpenBGP rules? -- ======= Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br

Re: OpenBGP Filter - Selectively Announcing by Peer.

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:20:55PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I want to selectively announce what I get from my peers (whom I am >> transit for) for a certain upstream peer. I decided to use commu

ASN Flow Exporter for OpenBGP device

pend on my observation of potential ASN to be tracked. Its OK but this way I miss the behavior deviations, if a certain quiet ASN suddenly raises traffic and later lowers it back again. So, how options we have? Thank you in advance. -- ======= Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com pr

Re: ASN Flow Exporter for OpenBGP device

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Eduardo Meyer [2009-12-04 17:29]: >> Hello, >> >> I have an OpenBGP device and I need to find out which ASN demands more >> bandwidth to do some sort of traffic policy engineering. Therefore I >> need to k