0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16
pcic0 at isa0 port 0x3e0/2 iomem 0xd/16384
pcic0 controller 0: has socket A only
pcmcia0 at pcic0 controller 0 socket 0
pcic0: irq 3, polling enabled
biomask ef75 netmask ef75 ttymask
pctr: user-level cycle counter enabled
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
--
D. E. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D. E. Evans wrote:
> On a Toshiba Satellite a35-s1593, without a PC-card currently plugged
> in, I get a mapping error for the CardBus (cbb). I intend to purchase
> a wireless PC-Card (I haven't decided on model yet), and wish to
> ensure it will work with the car
I would like to use lesstif, instead of openmotif, for licensing
reasons with applications such as xpdf, xfm, etc., but the ports
system appears to not just favour openmotif, but require it. For
instance, with xpdf, setting USE_MOTIF to no in the Makefile--with
lesstif already installed--results i
I finally got xpdf to compile without openmotif, (see the unanswered
request from 17 June 2005). One nice feature of the ports is that
if lesstif is already installed, it won't install openmotif. With
xpdf, If I set USE_MOTIF to no, and then compile xpdf *after* having
installed lesstif this will
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:40:13AM +0200, Francois Visconte wrote:
> Is there many people using pkgsrc on openbsd ?
I used it at one time, but found that OpenBSD's ports system made
more sense for OpenBSD.
> Is there any particular problem using pkgsrc on openbsd ?
http://www.ne
So you say that the patch should go into OPENBSD_3_9 branch after 3.9
is *officially* released? Well, I wonder how people who pre-orded
their CDs, got them, installed 3.9-RELEASE and run Sendmail are going
to patch their systems?
I got 3.8 almost 2 weeks early, and seem to remember app
bly both). As it is now, I must manually add
the "-- " and newline, then ~r my .signature.
Any takers?
--
D. E. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.deevans.net>
mount_msdos /dev/fd0c I get a 'device not configured' error.
>snip<
Any other ideas?
What about a higher device letter? fd0d? fd0i?
Perhaps this should be sent to x.org, but since OpenBSD maintains its
own X, I must ask: why is startx using .serverauth.$$ for its xauth,
instead of $XAUTHORITY? This seems redundant, and a pain in the
ass for those of us who find xdm boring, finding xdm redundant.
--
D. E. Evans <[EM
Maybe I'm the only one around who still uses it, but there's one
option in mailx from SysV that I miss with OpenBSD: ~a. It would
be simpler to have either ~a to add the "-- " with newline, and
read in my .signature, or a .mailrc option that automates the
additions, (preferably bot
I know this isn't the answer you were looking for, but in the
past I've added the "-- " to my .signature. Technically that's
not a correct thing to do, but in practice it worked fine for
me.
Since I use tin for news, and Mail for mail, this would cause a
conflict, since tin automatical
Upgrade from 3.7 to 3.9. It may be fixed in 3.9 (I remember stuff that was
For the sake of clarity, upgrade to 3.8 first, *then* 3.9.
I'd like to know if its possible to share a printer connected to a
Windows machine to print a document from a OpenBSD machine.
I know that Windows XP Pro, and Win2003 Server, ship with a BSD
print daemon that can share the printer, (you have to purchase it
for other versions of NT). Windows
The state of the art of computer science has gone (steadily?) downhill
for the last 30 (maybe 40) years.
The computers are bigger and faster, but the knowedge of what to do with
them has decayed.
That time would it put it at about 1974, when the altair came out,
and home users got to b
Maybe my reply didn't make it: use ports' mail/nail package.
It did.
Nail is one option, but seems a bit much for the want of a single
option, when the program that ships with OpenBSD will already do.
It will be easier (and perhaps a learning experience) to submit a
patch to the current Mai
I notice groff hasn't been updated in 2-3 years. Any particular reason?
Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one
> comes to the Father except through me.
That would directly contradict the previous advice of thinking for one's
self.
Why is this conversation persisting? If I want
Which window manager(s) do you recommend? I'll try it(them).
See http://www.xwinman.org>.
Keep in mind the applications you will be running, and whether they
need ICCCM or NetWM (EWMH) hints, or other dependencies for
certain functions the ports system may not automatically provide.
The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
then why is kio accessing them?
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
It would be more beneficial for you and us to send patches, after
consulting with the ports mailing list, that better adapt KD
> giving you the benefit of the doubt. Now that you know what kio is
> for, does it start to make sense why it would access files in /etc
> that pertain to file sharing?
It is interesting to see the leaps in your logic. I do not run samba. It
actually got installed by my mistake an
You just don't get it, do you? It doesn't matter if you're running
Samba or not. Kio will attempt to access those files which it is
Correct me if I'm being ignorant, but I don't remember seeing this
message from 3.8 or 3.9 KDE binaries that I have used (from the
CDs). Is it possible t
Is there an append function ~a for inserting text, especially regarding
signatures?
22 matches
Mail list logo
