> giving you the benefit of the doubt. Now that you know what kio is > for, does it start to make sense why it would access files in /etc > that pertain to file sharing?
It is interesting to see the leaps in your logic. I do not run samba. It actually got installed by my mistake and I deleted as much of it as I could because I consider it a big security vulnerability. This begs the question how you installed Samba by mistake if you needed to delete "as much of it as" you could. Am I assuming to much in asking whether you used ports to install samba? What is it that you had to delete if you had used pkg_delete? Am I assuming to much by thinking that "actually got installed" means that you installed samba? The fact that you admit you installed it, while denying that you run samba, begs a "leap in logic" to blame others for their leap in logic, when you are the one who mentioned samba (via /etc). For blaming us for using leaps in logic, you're not leaving us much to work with, though it is interesting now that you mention it, considering you are having problems with KDE regarding it. Hmmm...you hadn't mentioned this before.
