Hi,
First, and just for the record: while trying to set up an FTP server on
OpenBSD 4.2 I got this error message while trying to connect by any
other address than 'localhost':
421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection.
Reason, it turned out: a missing entry in /etc/hosts.all
rrent GNOME
desktop with an OpenBSD-based one, so I can keep more in touch with this
excellent little system;).
Bill
> On 05/05/2009, Bill Maas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > First, and just for the record: while trying to set up an FTP server on
> > OpenBSD 4.2 I got thi
Hi,
I got a "bad ref count" panic message while trying to access a directory
on a 45 GB ext3 partition. Below is what I managed to salvage. Any
workarounds for this? Anyway, got GNOME on OpenBSD up and running, made
very easy, great!
Bill
-
[owner-misc: wrong address - sorry - resend]
Hi,
is there a separate channel for desktop bugs/discussions [planned]? I'm
running into GNOME bugs from time to time which are hardly worth
bothering the core development team with. Such a channel (e.g. an
"openbsd-desktop" list) might also help redir
Hi Antoine,
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bill Maas wrote:
>
> > [owner-misc: wrong address - sorry - resend]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a separate channel for desktop bugs/discussions [planned]? I'm
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 12:21 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bill Maas wrote:
>
> > Hi Antoine,
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bill Maas wrote:
> > >
> >
Hi Antoine,
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:39 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bill Maas wrote:
> > - evolution is incredibly slow at startup
>
> Known issue. Probably threads related, but it is just a wild guess. I
> had no time to look into the
Hi,
I posted a message earlier about a kernel panic occurring when I
accessed a file on some of my ext3 fses. I've also been having trouble
with r/w extfs entries in fstab. At boot time I'm dropped to a shell
because fsck thinks the fs is unclean, even when "the other side" says
it's clean.
There
Hi,
I figured I might as well add some disk details to my previous
message (Ext2/3 mount trouble), so here's the whole story.
r...@happyflowers:~# cat /etc/fstab
/dev/sd0a / ffs rw 1 1
/dev/sd0g /home ffs r
Hi Ted,
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 13:01 -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Bill Maas wrote:
> > I posted a message earlier about a kernel panic occurring when I
> > accessed a file on some of my ext3 fses. I've also been having trouble
> > with r/w
Hi,
it's Evolution once again: hangs for no apparent reason while I'm typing
a message (the one previously posted, in fact;). Hope that this will be
of any use, grabbed while Evolution was hanging:
exo...@borealis:~$ kdump -p 20329
20329 evolution EMUL "native"
20329 evolution RET poll 0
Hi Antoine,
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:47 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Bill Maas wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > it's Evolution once again: hangs for no apparent reason while I'm typing
> > a message (the one previously posted, in fact;
Hi Donald,
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 06:33 -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
[...]
> I had nothing to do with writing the documentation and so have no ax
> to grind, but FAQ items 8.21 and 14.16 look pretty explicit to me.
[...]
8.21: OpenBSD does support journaling fses (ext3 at least), it just
doesn't su
Hi Donald,
I'm slowly starting to get the whole picture here.. I'll start with
updating my in-memory copy of the FAQ.
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 09:13 -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Bill Maas wrote:
> Hi Donald,
>
Hi,
Got this while trying to compile GNOME from ports on 6/16 snapshot
(packages were broken):
===> Extracting for gst-plugins-good-0.10.8
cp
-R /usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-0.10/plugins-good/files
/usr/ports/obj/gst-plugins-good-0.10.8/gst-plugins-good-0.10.8/ext/libsndio
ln: /usr/ports/obj
Hi Ken,
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:09 -0400, Hendrickson, Kenneth wrote:
> > > *0: A6 0 1 1 -131 127 63 [ 63: 2112516 ]
> > > OpenBSD
> > > 1: DA131 128 1 -262 254 63 [ 2112579: 2112516 ]
> > >
> > > 2: DA263 0 1 - 6211 254 63 [ 4225
I tried that too a while ago, without success. If I remember it well,
support for diskless booting was dropped for i386 at some point, though
the config still contains references to it here and there. But someone
kick me if I'm wrong..
Bill
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 22:09 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wro
procedures for AMD64 and i386 clients vary somewhat to the stages
detailed above. See pxeboot(8) for more detailed information."
They seem to vary more than "somewhat"..
Bill
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 06:59 +0100, Bill Maas wrote:
> I tried that too a while ago, without success. If I
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 15:47 -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/11/06, Carlos A. Garcia G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i have recived a mail from the server with this information
> > >
> > > Checking setuid/setgid files and devices:
>
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 11:26 +1100, Craig Barraclough wrote:
> > I tried something similar, because I wanted to see if I could mount an
> > NFS partition from my Soekris, running OpenBSD, but I
> > couldn't get it to
> > work. I also couldn't get NFS support to compile properly, so
> > I left it
>
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, Vim Visual wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok... it's taken me blood and sweat but I have succeeded at resizing
> (per hand) the linux disk without losing data (!). Qtparted just
> didn't work at all.
Qtparted is probably a front-end to Parted, which is yet another GNU
misgrow
Hi,
I'm working on a configuration management system based on siteXX-like
archives. While writing the software was mostly fun, the documentation
has turned out to be a bit of an ordeal due to motivational issues,
illness and stuff. I guess I've mostly been missing the necessary
feedback. So please
the same things are done twice that's too bad, but you
will be safer than when trying to maintain your own basXX.tgz etc., and
keeping it in sync with the main dist.
Upgrades are an automation nightmare, Linux distros claim they can do it
but they can't (goes wrong more often than not - I've stopped installing
updates on my Ubuntu-driven desktop, which saves me lots of reinstalls).
I would simply reinstall, after having distilled a working config from a
test system.
Bill Maas
Hi,
how about this one:
PermitRootLogin 192.168.1
Should any of the SSH maintainers be reading this: possible new SSH
feature?
Bill
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 12:24 +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> I have a question on the default behaviour of OpenSSH. Please, do not
> understand that
I'm not sure if this will be of any help, but at least the Firefox issue
sounds like FF is able to connect, but never receives any return
traffic. I've had that with misconfigured netmasks I believe. Does Vista
use some sort of net group or certificate based access scheme (e.g. "if
it's not a Vista
>From my notes (this is apparently the "old" way to do it,
but it might work for you as a quick fix):
Error: "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstubs"
Problem: /usr/src/distrib/special/libstubs/libstubs.a does not exist
Fix:
cd /usr/src/distrib/special/libstubs
make
Bill
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 09:05
Hello Robert,
I don't feel authorized to tell you that everything inside base.tgz is
set correctly after untarring (must look inside install script to be
100% sure), but here's a script that I've been using lately. Note
Linux' [sS] and OpenBSD's [tT]. Good that there are standards!
Bill
---
On 12/4/06, Markus Bergkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, the connection light and the transmission light is always on,
> regardsless if it is connected to the network or sending/receiving or
> not. Only when I take the network interface down the lights go out. If
> that means anything to any
ote:
> I have a RT2600 also on my AP so I guess I have to get my hands on a
> working out-of-the-box AP to verify that it is no hardware problem.
>
> /Markus
>
> Bill Maas wrote:
> > On 12/4/06, Markus Bergkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Also, the co
29 matches
Mail list logo
