* John Jasen [2013-08-09 03:36]:
> Topping out per 82599 card at ~8k interrupts does not surprise me, as I
> was unable to get any of mine beyond that. I personally think the 82598
> is better under OpenBSD, using about 40% of the interrupts for similar
> bandwidth.
>
> The system showing 90% uti
As far as I know X540-T2 out on the market don't do PCI 3.0.
Cards I have are PCI 2.1, this means (if I remember my calculations right) this
10G card is caped by PCI bus - 6G max.
Basically Intel sells 10G which is caped up to 6G. and this is for the single
port. If those ports are both in use, t
This has been asked and answered numerous times, with generous helpings of
shitheadery that serves to mask any real information offered. Check the archives
for the obvious keywords. There's nothing to add since the last iteration.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 impl
On 08/08/2013 02:33 PM, Joerg Streckfuss wrote:
Am 07.08.2013 16:20, schrieb Christian Weisgerber:
Well, you can either use two NICs on your gateway, one connected
to a vlan1 port on the switch, the other to vlan2. Or you can can
set up vlan1 and vlan2 on em0 and connect them to a trunk port on
I don't know how I made it (probably in previous releases of OS), but
now I have a disk with the following disklabel:
# /dev/rsd2c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: ST1000DM003-9YN1
duid: b0e3fc037df87899
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cy
- Original message -
> As far as I know X540-T2 out on the market don't do PCI 3.0.
> Cards I have are PCI 2.1, this means (if I remember my calculations
> right) this 10G card is caped by PCI bus - 6G max. Basically Intel sells
> 10G which is caped up to 6G. and this is for the single port
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:38:16AM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> 16 partitions:
> #size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
> a: 1953519936 64 4.2BSD 8192 655361 # /bu
> c: 19535251680 4.2BSD 2048 163841
It wer
On 2013-08-04 Sun 14:30 PM |, Gregor Best wrote:
>
> known wireless ESSIDs, known gateway MAC addresses and known network
> topologies, for example "When I'm at home, my gateway is 192.168.2.1,
> there's a host named Zim and one named Gir and my public IP address
> resolves back to Unity Media". T
On a multi-user box, what are the recommended permissions/ownership of
/etc/mail/spamd.key?
Or is the question irrelevant as a checksum of the file is used, not its
contents?
Thanks,
--
Craig Skinner | http://twitter.com/Craig_Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:05:34PM +0100, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> On a multi-user box, what are the recommended permissions/ownership of
> /etc/mail/spamd.key?
I checked the nearest couple of spamd equipped boxes, and it tends to be
[Fri Aug 09 14:21:47] peter@skapet:~/www_sider$ ls -l /etc/mai
Hi folks.
Currently I have a Wireless network serving in my town using a small
form factor (mini-itx) PC with OpenBSD for pf,squid, and dns cache.
I need recommendations for a network appliance in rack mode with flash
storage and five rj45 ports.
Can anyone recommended a solution for my needs ?
On 08/09/2013 05:38 AM, Federico Giannici wrote:
I don't know how I made it (probably in previous releases of OS), but
now I have a disk with the following disklabel:
# /dev/rsd2c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: ST1000DM003-9YN1
duid: b0e3fc037df87899
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 6
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:35 PM, John Jasen wrote:
> You may want to test jumbo frames, just to see what would happen. I
> would expect you to see closer to 10 Gb/s with the same number of
> interrupts.
Results for jumbo frames are below (spoiler: 10 Gbps, same number of
interrupts, 40% CPU0 usage
* Maxim Khitrov [2013-08-09 17:47]:
> and ran iperf
> # s1: iperf -s
> # c1: iperf -c s1 -t 60 -m
> # s1: iperf -s
> # s2: iperf -s
> # c1: nc gw 1234 ; iperf -c s1 -t 60
> # c2: nc gw 1234 ; iperf -c s2 -t 60
your tests are flawed. you are testing iperf ('s lack of) performance.
use tcpbench. o
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Maxim Khitrov [2013-08-09 17:47]:
>> and ran iperf
>> # s1: iperf -s
>> # c1: iperf -c s1 -t 60 -m
>> # s1: iperf -s
>> # s2: iperf -s
>> # c1: nc gw 1234 ; iperf -c s1 -t 60
>> # c2: nc gw 1234 ; iperf -c s2 -t 60
>
> your tests are flaw
On 08/09/2013 12:00 AM, voic...@openmailbox.org wrote:
...
The first one. We all know that the operating system OpenBSD largely
depends on lead, so what will happen when time will come for Theo? We
all know that so far people do not live thousands of years... I think
that not only me would be int
@Scott
>>>I could win the lotto; gamma rays could destroy the planet; I could get
hit by a bus. That's why the source and commit logs are *not* available to
the public, and the whole damn thing is proprietary. There is no possible
way anyone could know what the devs are doing.
Forgive my squirr
On 08/09/2013 03:43 PM, slhac tivist wrote:
@Scott
I could win the lotto; gamma rays could destroy the planet; I could get
hit by a bus. That's why the source and commit logs are *not* available to
the public, and the whole damn thing is proprietary. There is no possible
way anyone could know
I'm new to the system and I'm having difficulty getting SSHD set up. I
would like to be able to SSH to the computer I have OpenBSD on. I viewed
rf.conf and sshd_flags="" is in there, didn't see it in rf.conf.local. I
tried starting it by enter /usr/sbin/sshd and received something along the
line
On 08/09/2013 03:24 PM, Lance Ferrer wrote:
I'm not sure if I need to create the keys or what, looking for a little
bit of guidance. Sorry for the trouble with probably such a simple
task.
Did quite a bit of googling, no luck
You could create them yourself by running "ssh-keygen -A" as roo
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:38:16AM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> I don't know how I made it (probably in previous releases of OS),
> but now I have a disk with the following disklabel:
>
> # /dev/rsd2c:
> type: SCSI
> disk: SCSI disk
> label: ST1000DM003-9YN1
> duid: b0e3fc037df87899
> flags:
Francisco Valladolid H. wrote:
I need recommendations for a network appliance in rack mode with flash
storage and five rj45 ports.
RJ45 ports? 100Mbit? Gigabit?
Can anyone recommended a solution for my needs ?
If 100Mbit is fine, go with a Mini-ITX board and a 4-port Ethernet card
in the P
I've used the Soekris brand. http://soekris.com/, but they are a little
expensive. (In México taxes are a big problem).
In two months I'll test ALIX appliances:
http://pcengines.ch/alix.htm
They are cheaper, but I don't know about their performance.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Francisco Va
Hermes Ojeda Ruiz [hermes@gmail.com] wrote:
> I've used the Soekris brand. http://soekris.com/, but they are a little
> expensive. (In M?xico taxes are a big problem).
>
> In two months I'll test ALIX appliances:
> http://pcengines.ch/alix.htm
>
> They are cheaper, but I don't know about thei
I think
mini-ITX boards are ok, but I need a integrated solutions.
Soekris is fine but lack of characteristics. 1gb rj45 port, etc.
it http://www.calyptix.com/portfolio/ae1200/ look fine.
Regards.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Mikkel C. Simonsen wrote:
> Francisco Valladolid H. wrote:
>>
>>
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Hermes Ojeda Ruiz wrote:
> I've used the Soekris brand. http://soekris.com/, but they are a little
> expensive. (In México taxes are a big problem).
Yes, taxes and import duties are a pain.
I have a pair of Soekris 4501 running OpenBSD 4.6 yet!
>
> In two months I
> On 08/09/2013 12:00 AM, voic...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> ...
> > The first one. We all know that the operating system OpenBSD largely
> > depends on lead, so what will happen when time will come for Theo? We
> > all know that so far people do not live thousands of years... I think
> > that not on
On Friday, August 9, 2013, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> The process is so transparent, that you won't even know if it has
> happened before...
>
Well, *some* of us have noticed when your scars "reset"...
On 08/09/13 20:45, Theo de Raadt wrote:
What a bunch of worrying balony.
I have asexually reproduced a few times, and put the other copies of
myself in stasis.
In the event that I fall off a mountain or get attacked by group of
dogs in central Turkey, a copy is automatically brought out of sta
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:50:19PM -0500, Francisco Valladolid H. wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Hermes Ojeda Ruiz
> wrote:
> > I've used the Soekris brand. http://soekris.com/, but they are a little
> > expensive. (In M?xico taxes are a big problem).
>
> Yes, taxes and import duties a
Between various HDDs, RAID 1 arrays, RAID C arrays within, iDevices, USB
sticks and any other stuff you can think of, I've found that the
standard install of /dev/sd[0-9] doesn't have enough. (I primarily use
amd64.)
I don't mind creating the additional devices, which I often forget;
that's
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:25 PM, William Ahern
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:50:19PM -0500, Francisco Valladolid H. wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Hermes Ojeda Ruiz
>> wrote:
>> > I've used the Soekris brand. http://soekris.com/, but they are a little
>> > expensive. (In M?xico t
I second this. An atom board with ECC and a pci NiC to add the ports you need
is a great solution. I have a supermicro running and the performance is
fantastic.
I think you can get an 1u barebones for a good price
On Aug 9, 2013, at 9:27 PM, "William Ahern" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On 08/09/2013 12:00 AM, voic...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>> ...
>> > The first one. We all know that the operating system OpenBSD largely
>> > depends on lead, so what will happen when time will come for Theo? We
>> > all know that so far peopl
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:54:01PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:38:16AM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> > I don't know how I made it (probably in previous releases of OS),
> > but now I have a disk with the following disklabel:
> >
> > # /dev/rsd2c:
> > type: S
I recently read an article from facebook on password cracking. It got
me thinking about how useful dedicated hardware might be for hashing
passwords.
Source:
http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/05/how-crackers-make-minced-meat-out-of-your-passwords/
Fairly basic stuff (MD5, brute & dictionary
So the rumors are true the movie below is based on the process developed/used
by Theo..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_(film)
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On 08/09/2013 12:00 AM, voic...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>> ...
>> > The first one. We all know that the operating system OpenBSD largel
37 matches
Mail list logo
