On 2011-09-22, Philip Guenther wrote:
> 2011/9/21 johnw :
>> Hi, i see it in dmesg
>> bsdbox /bsd: pid 9648 (mlnet): user write of 4096@0x202d4000 at 5328
>> failed: 14
>>
>> what is this mean?
>
> 14 == EFAULT. Sounds like that process (mlnet) passed a system call a
> memory address for the kern
Hello there people,
Yesterday i upgraded from 4.9 stable to -current using a 5 current -cd:
this is my sysctl:
$ sysctl -n kern.version
OpenBSD 5.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #67: Tue Sep 13 22:12:54 MDT 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
I have i386 archite
seems to me like some Linux config, but I may be wrong. Didn't see
anything similar on BSD. Btw did you try plain setxkbmap app for
setting that from command line without those conf.d files? I hope that
you used sysmerge after upgrade of system
On 9/22/11, Sepuku Kamikazee wrote:
> Hello there pe
Soluciones -Visuales
Esta es una Empresa dedicada a buscar un proveedor para cada cliente
Cubrimos los campos de FOTOGRAFIA Y VIDEO
Institucional, Social, Publicidad, etc.
Contamos con Profesionales y Productoras con trayectoria
Envmenos su pedido por mail y nosotros buscamos el mejor presupuesto
y
Hello there,
I installed avr-binutils and tried to use it on some code and
something strange happened. When I tried to compile code it appeared
that the m16def.inc had a bad syntacs the file is from ATMEL site.
What I did wrong?
Igor.
What's the latest ThinkPad that OpenBSD can be installed on, and have
everything functional without having to tweak any special settings within
OpenBSD?
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:20:19 +0800
igor denisov wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I installed avr-binutils and tried to use it on some code and
> something strange happened. When I tried to compile code it appeared
> that the m16def.inc had a bad syntacs the file is from ATMEL site.
>
> What I did wro
What, you mean OpenBSD hasn't been superseded by MenuetOS yet?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:50 AM, jirib wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:20:19 +0800
> igor denisov wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I installed avr-binutils and tried to use it on some code and
>> something strange happened. When I tri
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:12:11AM -0700, James Hozier wrote:
> What's the latest ThinkPad that OpenBSD can be installed on, and have
> everything functional without having to tweak any special settings within
> OpenBSD?
>
x61s
My x201 is very functional, except for bluetooth and the gsm modem.
x220 is getting closer and closer to being fully-functional.
On 2011 Sep 22 (Thu) at 09:12:11 -0700 (-0700), James Hozier wrote:
:What's the latest ThinkPad that OpenBSD can be installed on, and have
everything functional withou
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 04:28:19PM +0300, Sepuku Kamikazee wrote:
> Hello there people,
>
> Yesterday i upgraded from 4.9 stable to -current using a 5 current -cd:
>
> this is my sysctl:
>
> $ sysctl -n kern.version
> OpenBSD 5.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #67: Tue Sep 13 22:12:54 MDT 2011
> der
pc105 = pc104 + Multimedia and acpi key
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:37:56PM +0300, Sepuku Kamikazee wrote:
>
>
> Yeap,that surely did it!!I now have both layouts. :D Just a question
> if you know : For me it works with both "pc104" and "pc105".What's the
> difference? :) Thanx a lot for your he
Hello there Tomas,
Yes i used sysmerge for my upgrade.Also i
followed Alexander's instructions and everything works like a charm so
far with both layouts. :)
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:43:16 +0200
> Subject: Re: Unable to add Greek Layout after Upgrading to -current
> From: tomas.bod...@gmail.co
Yeap,that surely did it!!I now have both layouts. :D Just a question
if you know : For me it works with both "pc104" and "pc105".What's the
difference? :) Thanx a lot for your help! I would also like to add for
anyone that might read in the future that i was able to set both
languages with
"setx
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:12:11AM -0700, James Hozier wrote:
> What's the latest ThinkPad that OpenBSD can be installed on, and have
> everything functional without having to tweak any special settings within
> OpenBSD?
I am using OpenBSD on a T61 and it works pretty well! I also have a T41
and
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:12 AM, James Hozier wrote:
> What's the latest ThinkPad that OpenBSD can be installed on, and have
> everything functional without having to tweak any special settings within
> OpenBSD?
>
>
http://www.nycbug.org/?NAV=dmesgd
search for thinkpad.
It seems to be from coredump_write(), in kern/kern_sig.c. The printf itself is
conditional though.
Perhaps you're both seeing it when the kernel doesn't have enough resources to
generate a core dump? That makes sense for chrome.
I guess someone figured if they couldn't write the core, make nois
It seems I've followed the instructions labelled "2011/09/19 - thread
model posix enabled for gcc 3" at
http://openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919 and mistakenly so which
is probably why userland wont build as that process has replaced
gcc-4.x with gcc-3.x.
If indeed that is the case, the questi
> It seems I've [blindly] followed the instructions ...
Hah. Whoops.
> If indeed that is the case, the question is, how do I get gcc-4.x back ?
It would be easier to reinstall, but you may be able to extract the comp set
and pray to santa it works.
-Bryan.
>> It seems I've [blindly] followed the instructions ...
>
> Hah. Whoops.
yeah... what were you thinking!
>> If indeed that is the case, the question is, how do I get gcc-4.x back ?
>
> It would be easier to reinstall, but you may be able to extract the comp set
> and pray to santa it works.
>
o
On 09/22/11 12:12, James Hozier wrote:
What's the latest ThinkPad that OpenBSD can be installed on, and have
everything functional without having to tweak any special settings within
OpenBSD?
Given that Lenovo has several concurrent series being sold, you'd
have a hard time figuring out the
Hello,
Not sure if this is the right place to request help for this, but I'm
reading mbr.S file (i386 arch), but could not figure out what the function
is for the line that reads "1:".
The code below that line is setting up statck, but why do we need this line?
and there are more than one line tha
On 21-Sep-11 02:23, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello list,
is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
snapshot packags from being built?
I am seeing this too. What is going on? There are packages for other
platforms and none for others. All the mirrors I have check has
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:53 PM, LeviaComm Networks wrote:
>
> The only way I see to move forward would be to either downgrade to 4.9 or
> compile the damned packages myself.
>
Which would be faster than complaining.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:53 PM, LeviaComm Networks
wrote:
> On 21-Sep-11 02:23, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
>> snapshot packags from being built?
>>
> I am seeing this too. What is going on? There are packages
The 1: is the target for the preceding ljmp instruction. This is a local
label. Reference here:
http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/Symbol-Names.html#Symbol-Names
The reason the ljmp is needed in the first place is because In real mode there
are multiple ways to refer to the same memory address
On 09/22/11 20:53, LeviaComm Networks wrote:
On 21-Sep-11 02:23, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello list,
is this intentional, or there is some problem that prevents amd64
snapshot packags from being built?
I am seeing this too. What is going on? There are packages for other
platforms and none f
One of the first things an MBR does is do a long jump from where the BIOS
loaded it.
The thing is, often you can't trust the BIOS to do the right thing, the x86 in
16-bit real mode uses segmented memory, so you may be at :07C0 or 7C00:
depending on the implementation. If you read the co
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Brynet wrote:
> you may be able to extract the comp set
I did extract the comp set from the latest snapshot and gcc-4.x was returned.
However, once again the kernel compiled fine but received the same
error with the userland,
Chris
Hi Amit,
Amit Kulkarni wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:47:29PM -0500:
> Wow.bye bye apache.
Not yet.
This is the start of a project, not the completion.
Now, nginx has to prove itself.
> Does it seem like changes are occurring at a blinding pace in last year?
Maybe, though certain
30 matches
Mail list logo
