SLiM: X server already running on display 0

2011-04-03 Thread Nathan Van Ymeren
Hi folks, I'm attempting to install SLiM and XFCE4 on 4.8. I first installed slim to replace the oh-so-pretty xdm, and it worked fine to get into fvwm. After installing xfce4 however, xdm started instead of slim on boot. As best I can determine it's an xfce problem, not a slim problem. relevan

Re: SLiM: X server already running on display 0

2011-04-03 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Nathan Van Ymeren wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm attempting to install SLiM and XFCE4 on 4.8. > > I first installed slim to replace the oh-so-pretty xdm, and it worked fine > to get into fvwm. After installing xfce4 however, xdm started instead of > slim on boot. As b

...excelencia que trasciende los espacios

2011-04-03 Thread SQL Muebles de cocina
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] SQL AMOBLAMIENTOS Somos una empresa dedicada a la fabricacisn de amoblamientos para el hogar, tendiente a la calidad, la innovacisn en diseqo y estilo de vida de nuestros clientes. El compromiso y nuestra lealtad con el cliente son nuestros valores fundamentales. Contamo

Re: SLiM: X server already running on display 0

2011-04-03 Thread Nathan Van Ymeren
> What about _not_ starting xdm AND slim ? You're the one to decide > which login manager you want, through xdm_flags='' in rc.conf.local or > the slim snippet from pkg_info -M which goes into rc.local. > Installing xfce4 has nothing to do with starting xdm/slim. > > Landry Landry, I'd already ad

Re: authpf+CARP

2011-04-03 Thread Nick Holland
On 04/02/11 05:16, Eukasz Walczak wrote: > hi, > > Is it possible with OpenBSD's PF to set up redundant firewall using > authpf mechanism together. I mean users logging into firewall via ssh, > accounts with authpf shell, obtaining specific rule set, with redundancy > firewall based on CARP.

No async for msdosfs. Why?

2011-04-03 Thread Alexander Polakov
mount_msdos(8) says: -o options Use the specified mount options, as described in mount(8). But when you try -o async it says "option not supported". I added MOPT_ASYNC into mount_msdos (see diff below), and now msdosfs can be mounted asynchronously (bwrite() checks mount fla

Which NIC better for heavy loads?

2011-04-03 Thread Rod Whitworth
I have a Soekris 5501 with a 1641 4 port card. The mobo has 4* vr(4) ports and the 1641 has 4* sis(4) ports I'm just compiling 4.9-current and I wondered about which is the better for handling heavy traffic. I haven't done any load testing since both of those interfaces had some significant impro

Write Apt and Accurate English

2011-04-03 Thread binson
Scroll

OBSD unusable after install reboot

2011-04-03 Thread Sha'ul
I install, reboot, and get kernal panic before I can login for the first time into the system. I included 2 dmesg's because they don't read the same under .mp and .rd and I can not run trace in bsd.rd because it starts the install when I boot>bsd.rd so I can only do (I)nstall (U)pgrade (S)hell

Re: No async for msdosfs. Why?

2011-04-03 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Alexander Polakov wrote: > mount_msdos(8) says: > > -o options > Use the specified mount options, as described in > mount(8). > > But when you try -o async it says "option not supported". > I added MOPT_ASYNC into mount_msdos (see diff below), an