i believe the diff below should work out of the box. it pulls in
all mikeb's fixes.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:54:09PM +0100, ??ukasz Czarniecki wrote:
> With following Mike's suggestions it worked.
>
>
> # scsi -f /dev/rsd0c -m 8
> IC: 0
> ABPF: 0
> CAP: 0
> DISC: 0
> SIZE: 0
> WCE: 1
> M
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 09:40:40PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-02-19, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:01:36AM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> >> On 2/19/11 12:51 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >> >On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Ouellet
> >> >wrote:
> >> >>On 2/
On 2011-02-20, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> > It is possible to that in ifconfig as well. I use it all the time.
>> > It works in hostname.if if you skip the inet IIRC.
>>
>> For main addresses, yes it does (either with or without the "inet"),
>> but not for aliases.
>>
>
> # ifconfig tun10 192.168.2
> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:54:21 +1000
> From: David Gwynne
>
> > how to manipulate write cache policy?
>
> the lsi firmwares dont implement handling of the mod page changes
> unfortunately. you could call the ioctl this implements yourself
> though from userland.
David, while I think that impl
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:54:21 +1000
> > From: David Gwynne
> >
> > > how to manipulate write cache policy?
> >
> > the lsi firmwares dont implement handling of the mod page changes
> > unfortunately. you could call the ioctl thi
> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:03:25 -0500
> From: Kenneth R Westerback
>
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:54:21 +1000
> > > From: David Gwynne
> > >
> > > > how to manipulate write cache policy?
> > >
> > > the lsi firmwares dont imp
Si usted no logra ver este mailmasivo PINCHE AQUI
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Chat Foros Postales Noticias Confesiones Amigos El Muro Fotolog Juegos
Romances Buscador Videolog Perfiles Chile
Hola,
Alguien ha querido invitarte a conocer y unirte a OpenChile.cl, el nuevo
portal social 100%
On Sun 2011.02.20 at 13:28 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:03:25 -0500
> > From: Kenneth R Westerback
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:54:21 +1000
> > > > From: David Gwynne
> > > >
> > > > > how to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
How comes that all group names set in /etc/hostname.tun0 get lost
(except for "tun", as it seems), if using OpenVPN on this interface?
What would you suggest to keep the defined group names?
Any helpful comment would be highly appreciated.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
wrote:
> Ah, that's the bit I was missing. A userland tool to display and
> manipulate the cache settings would still be good though.
> Functionality should probably be added to bioctl(8). A bit
> unfortunate that both the -c and -C options are alre
On 2011/02/20 11:59, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
> > Ah, that's the bit I was missing. A userland tool to display and
> > manipulate the cache settings would still be good though.
> > Functionality should probably be added to bioctl(8). A bit
> >
On 2011-02-20, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> How comes that all group names set in /etc/hostname.tun0 get lost
> (except for "tun", as it seems), if using OpenVPN on this interface?
As per the message when you install the package, "OpenVPN re-creates
the tun(4) interface at startup".
>
On 2011-02-19, Ana Zgombic wrote:
> Hi Misc,
>
> i'm trying to collect firsthand experience on implementing application
> level bandwidth throttling.
>
> background: i'm looking at playing with thttpd and i want to remove
> the bandwidth throttling code since it looks insignificant to me.
>
> insi
Hi,
I am experiencing some problems with pf: On one of my ethernet ports
UID/PID is not working (on the others it does work). Therefore UID based
rules do not work on that port.
Details:
On my firewall (PC engines board) there are 4 ethernet ports: 3 physical
(vc0, vc1 and vc3) and 1 tunnel
I was following 4.8 stable branch. After kernel compiled successfully
make build has failed with the following:
cc: unrecognized option '-I/usr/src/lib/libc/include'
cc: unrecognized option '-DAPIWARN'
cc: unrecognized option '-DYP'
cc: unrecognized option '-I/usr/src/lib/libc/yp'
cc: unrecogniz
Did you forget to do make clean?
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:57 PM, klerfe [Bodegas] wrote:
> I was following 4.8 stable branch. After kernel compiled successfully make
> build has failed with the following:
>
> cc: unrecognized option '-I/usr/src/lib/libc/include'
> cc: unrecognized option '-DAPIW
bah!
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 07:20:19PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/02/20 11:59, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> > wrote:
> > > Ah, that's the bit I was missing. A userland tool to display and
> > > manipulate the cache settings would still be
On 02/20/11 17:56, klerfe [Bodegas] wrote:
> I was following 4.8 stable branch. After kernel compiled successfully
> make build has failed with the following:
Start at the top of FAQ 5. Read and understand 5.1 and 5.2 carefully
and more-or-less completely, there's a test that follows.
5.3 is th
Public Bank Berhad
+ Akaun anda telah disekat untuk masa depan kemas.
* Semua Public Bank , Public Islamic Bank dan Public Mutual pengguna,
har
19 matches
Mail list logo
