On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 01:51:59PM -0700, new_guy wrote:
> I've begun using OpenBSD on portable computers/laptops. I want to guard
> against theft. I can't stand the thought of some crook pawing my laptop and
> someone looking over my personal files... pictures of my family, my taxes,
> etc... it k
This question may be a bit strange, if not entirely misguided, but here
goes...
Is there any way to assign inet aliases to a networkB interface such
that each IP addressB uses a unique MAC address?
B
Here's why I'm wondering:B We have aB network behind NAT, but with a
few internal hosts that
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Raimo Niskanen
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 01:51:59PM -0700, new_guy wrote:
>> I've begun using OpenBSD on portable computers/laptops. I want to guard
>> against theft. I can't stand the thought of some crook pawing my laptop and
>> someone looking over my per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
Although I saw that OpenBSD 4.4 has NRPE 2.7, wanted to install
something newer and I'm trying to compile NRPE 2.12 downloading of
Nagios site. But after executing 'configure', the process finishes with
the following error message:
checking f
> It isn't worth using it. The overhead is too high.
>
>
OK, thanks for the response.
That being the case, can anybody give me any advice on what hardware I would
need to achieve gigabit VPN throughput (aes/3des & md5/sha1) with ipsec?
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 04:34:58AM +, Bryan wrote:
> Okay, I built and installed wmname from ports. I went in and started
> maptools, and on the first try, it works... YAY!!!
> Shutdown Maptools, and re-started it, gray screen... boo...
The grey screen is what I used to get before using
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 06:00:50AM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all!
>
> Although I saw that OpenBSD 4.4 has NRPE 2.7, wanted to install
> something newer and I'm trying to compile NRPE 2.12 downloading of
> Nagios site. But after executing
John Arnold schrieb:
>> It isn't worth using it. The overhead is too high.
>>
>>
>
> OK, thanks for the response.
>
> That being the case, can anybody give me any advice on what hardware I would
> need to achieve gigabit VPN throughput (aes/3des & md5/sha1) with ipsec?
>
Hi,
my max throughpu
Hello
I am in process to change in /var/www/conf/httpd.conf from
"AllowOverride None" to "AllowOverride AuthConfig"
in order to include .htaccess .htpasswd files for some directories.
Please let me know if there is any security issue with that or if it ios
better to use another way for authentic
Hi, guys.
I download and burn the install4.4.iso recently. After I boot from this cd
and want to install system via internet, it can't find interface in my
laptop. In the step of "configure network", the boot system can't find any
interface.
My laptop is a HP old one with Celeron-M 1.5GHz and Intel
Guido Tschakert schrieb:
> John Arnold schrieb:
>>> It isn't worth using it. The overhead is too high.
>>>
>>>
>> OK, thanks for the response.
>>
>> That being the case, can anybody give me any advice on what hardware I would
>> need to achieve gigabit VPN throughput (aes/3des & md5/sha1) with ip
That is strange because i update the source via cvsup with this
configuration :
# Defaults that apply to all the collections
*default release=cvs
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default umask=002
*default host=rt.fm
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default tag=OPENBSD_4_4
# If your netw
Hi
I will move the following on my local box from daily to weekly.local so that
this part of code is executed once a week only. It will therefore not be sent
by mail since it seems to me that the weekly is not logged via local email as
the daily is. This loss of information is not a problem but
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:05:18 +0100, Richie wrote
> That is strange because i update the source via cvsup with this ...
[snip]
> and i did what is in: http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html
> The kernel dont have any problem.
> I reboot and have this version: OpenBSD 4.4-stable (ATECH) #3: Tue
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:46:20AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Bryan wrote:
> > I've had some issues with a few apps that work in fluxbox, but refuse
> > to work in scrotwm.
>
> I have seen the same with some apps also.
>
> >
> > The other issue is with
The LG3D patch is built into sctorwm; it is done in a function called
workaround().
When I get some time I'll look at the other work around.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:09:57AM +0100, vex...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 04:34:58AM +, Bryan wrote:
> > Okay, I built and in
hi,
the ATECH kernel config is just a copy of DEFAULT i didn't change
anything yet.
i just did :
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf
# cp GENERIC.mp ATECH
# config ATECH
I did all the things described in FAQ5.3.5 .
This is the first time that occours. I did rebuild kernel / userland (
(#3)
2009/4/14 LeRoy, Ted
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm pretty new to OpenBSD and BSD in general, but I have an OpenBSD
> Syslog server up and receiving data. I'd like to have the system be
> pretty secure, and I'd like to monitor its security via a simple script
> that runs daily.
>
> Here's what I have in
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:26:46 +0200
"Jean-Francois" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I will move the following on my local box from daily to weekly.local
> so that this part of code is executed once a week only. It will
> therefore not be sent by mail since it seems to me that the weekly is
> not logged via local
Hi Jean-Francois,
> I will move the following on my local box from daily to weekly.local
> so that this part of code is executed once a week only.
> It will therefore not be sent by mail since it seems to me that the
> weekly is not logged via local email as the daily is.
There is no difference b
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 06:32, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> The LG3D patch is built into sctorwm; it is done in a function called
> workaround().
>
> When I get some time I'll look at the other work around.
>
Sorry for the static Marco... Take your time man. I know you've got
bigger fish to fry. G
On 4/14/2009 at 1:01 AM Edd Barrett wrote:
|Hi,
|
|On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Mike M wrote:
|> I just received a confirmation/tracking number for the shipment of my
|4.5 CD.
|
|Which supplier?
=
Computer Shop in Canada. I'm in the northeastern US.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:26:46PM +0200, jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:
> I will move the following on my local box from daily to weekly.local so that
> this part of code is executed once a week only. It will therefore not be sent
> by mail since it seems to me that the weekly is not logged via lo
>> Around two weeks ago Owain (oga@) mailed out a request for some monitors
in the UK, so that he could hack better on X. <<
This is now sorted. I'll be driving a pair up to Owain in the next few days,
courtesy of my employer (HGL Dynamics Ltd).
Steve
--
http://www.fivetrees.com
On 4/15/09, 7I7I wrote:
> Hi, guys.
> I download and burn the install4.4.iso recently. After I boot from this cd
> and want to install system via internet, it can't find interface in my
> laptop. In the step of "configure network", the boot system can't find any
> interface.
> My laptop is a HP ol
2009/4/15 Jean-Francois :
> Hello
>
> I am in process to change in /var/www/conf/httpd.conf from
> "AllowOverride None" to "AllowOverride AuthConfig"
> in order to include .htaccess .htpasswd files for some directories.
>
> Please let me know if there is any security issue with that or if it ios
>
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Has anybody been able to get Padlock accelerated SHA1 working on a C7
> > or is this not currently possible?
>
> It isn't worth using it. The overhead is too high.
Specifically: Via botched the implementation - their instruction set
does not allow t
Which HP T5000 did you install OpenBSD on ... and how did you do it?
I have a T5300, and I'd love to wipe its flash drive and install OpenBSD.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> Get an HP T5000 series. I use that for my home firewall; no fans and no
> noise. With 3 NIC
Hello,
Has anyone had success (or trouble) running OpenBSD on Sun X4140
systems? I'm looking for hardware to replace my current firewalls, and
my understanding is that Opteron gear is the way to go for pf
performance. I've been really happy with my other Sun boxes that have
ILOM remote management,
check you netcard ,8139card can be supportted since long time ago
to quote from my own email:
OpenBSD 4.4-beta (GENERIC) #976: Fri Jul 11 16:41:38 MDT 2008
pvalc...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Transmeta(tm) Crusoe(tm) Processor TM5800 ("GenuineTMx86" 586-class) 732
MHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,CX8,SEP,CMOV,SER,MMX
real m
Can any one run OpenBSD 4.5[1,2] under kvm ?
I run OpenBSD 4.4 under Debian 5.0 amd64(linux 2.6.26 with kvm-72)
fine, and snapshots older than 2009-04.
The new snapshots can install smoothly, but stopped at
display 'setting tty flags'.
[1] ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/
[2] ft
hi there,
i am reading the fdisk source to have a better understanding
what is what... it is not going really well i am afraid :]
first of all, i had a long hard look at the basic programs
that give information about disks in general: fdisk, disklabel,
and atactl (obviously, only for ata disks)
> I'm looking for hardware to replace my current firewalls, and
> my understanding is that Opteron gear is the way to go for pf
> performance.
Sorry, but my understanding is different. As I see it, any hardware
is fine for running pf.
We never optimized it for any specific hardware. Instead, it
I don't understand your questions.
We compile fdisk on every platform, on every type of disk, so I don't
understand what WDCC_IDENTIFY has to do with it.
You only care about PCs?
> i am reading the fdisk source to have a better understanding
> what is what... it is not going really well i am af
> Can any one run OpenBSD 4.5[1,2] under kvm ?
>
> I run OpenBSD 4.4 under Debian 5.0 amd64(linux 2.6.26 with kvm-72)
> fine, and snapshots older than 2009-04.
>
> The new snapshots can install smoothly, but stopped at
> display 'setting tty flags'.
>
> [1] ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snap
Hi all,
I'm having an issue with tables and anchors running 4.5 that I've beat
myself up with (along with a few willing souls in #pf and #openbsd) today.
The basis of this problem is the ability (or non-ability in my case) to
access global tables from within anchors, and after spending time searc
> Frantisek Holop wrote:
> >
> > i am reading the fdisk source to have a better understanding
> > what is what... it is not going really well i am afraid :]
Please read up on hale landis' "how it works" series. It's roughly
the best I've found on the subject. http://www.ata-atapi.com/hiwmbr.ht
Top Shop
Top e-revija: 35 l 15. april 2009.
Najbolja praktiD
na reE!enja i saveti za bolji E>ivot
PoD
etna l Budi fit l Lepota l Zdravlje l Kuhinja i domaDinstvo
Zabava i deca l Carstvo igraD
aka l Knjige
Top Shop
HIT TV proizvodi!
Sanozen jonizator
Sanozen jonizator
Ab trainer advance
A
I'm looking for hardware to replace my current firewalls, and
my understanding is that Opteron gear is the way to go for pf
performance.
Clayton,
As Theo said there is not point in that. The only thing I could think of
really is put your money more into good network card, or hardware with
goo
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:34:47AM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>> I'm looking for hardware to replace my current firewalls, and
>> my understanding is that Opteron gear is the way to go for pf
>> performance.
>
> As Theo said there is not point in that. The only thing I could think of
> really i
* Jason Dixon [2009-04-16 07:18]:
> We had a spare set of servers available, so I went back to the lab and
> reproduced the traffic profile. I then tested the same load with the MP
> kernel. My tests revealed that even though the kernel is not threaded,
> we benefit from equal distribution of in
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 07:47:14AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Jason Dixon [2009-04-16 07:18]:
> > We had a spare set of servers available, so I went back to the lab and
> > reproduced the traffic profile. I then tested the same load with the MP
> > kernel. My tests revealed that even thou
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 07:52:25AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 07:47:14AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > * Jason Dixon [2009-04-16 07:18]:
> > > We had a spare set of servers available, so I went back to the lab and
> > > reproduced the traffic profile. I then teste
To complement the man pages, the supported hardware pages and what
I've found in the archives on marc, I'd be interested to read any SAS
HBA recommendations people might have.
I'm looking at some used Sun x4150 servers which have 8-lane PCIe
slots but come with no built-in SAS/SATA controll
Hi all,
I'm having an issue with tables and anchors running 4.5 that I've beat
myself up with (along with a few willing souls in #pf and #openbsd) today.
The basis of this problem is the ability (or non-ability in my case) to
access global tables from within anchors, and after spending time searc
46 matches
Mail list logo
