Hi,
i would want to do something similar, but have not found the best way to
have a user autologin to a certain console.
What i did was i added a user "autologin" with some password. Then i
added "su autologin" to /etc/rc.local. That takes care of logging the
user in. Then i added my actions
On 2008-06-23, Theodore Wynnychenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I think the place for me to modify this process is by changing the
> variable to execute getty in /etc/ttys to instead launch minicom? I tried
> this, but (i guess, obviously) it did not work.
getty takes care of setting up the
On 13/06/2008, at 2:12 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
We are battling a few memory leaks in ACPI. This is what causes your
machine to misbehave.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 09:13:47PM +1200, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 12/06/2008, at 8:04 PM, Richard Toohey wrote:
When I press "i" for install, I get ..
That's not true. If you have a signed piece of paper saying I wrote it
in mm-dd- you are good to go. The same way patents work; prior art
can be proven by writing your idea in an engineering notebook (you know,
pen and paper!) and then signing it. Since those notebooks are usually
in chronol
Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?
One would be violating the copyright law regardless what name the said
code is released under right? I mean, a third party won't be able to
claim that they are the anonymou
On Friday June 20 2008 18:09, you wrote:
>Oh god... Into my University it's almost the opposite, so much
>professors using MS Word(R) and still using the IEEE .doc template to
>write papers. ... Personally I dont understand why it's so fuckin
>difficult to understand that LaTeX it's great.
I once
I didn't claim it was a good idea.
Anyway, this is all theoretical.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
> Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
> of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?
>
> One would be violating the copyright la
On 2008-06-23, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
> of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?
Someone may want to intentionally release it anonymously, then
go back and try and sue people for infringing their copyr
If I had windows installed first, then I installed openbsd, what would I type
to boot into windows?B Don't you have to type the name of the kernel?B What
is windows xp's kernel called?B I would also have to type the partition too
right?B Like sd0, that kind of thing.B If windows was my first p
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:07 AM, annne annnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I had windows installed first, then I installed openbsd, what would I type
> to boot into windows?
Read FAQ 4.8 & FAQ 14.6.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:07:27 -0700 (PDT), annne annnie wrote
> If I had windows installed first, then I installed openbsd, what
> would I type to boot into windows?B Don't you have to type the name
> of the kernel?B What is windows xp's kernel called?B I would also
> have to type the partitio
I'd written:
> FAQ 4.3 describes various ways...
That should be FAQ 4.8. Sorry for the typo.
* James Hartley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:07 AM, annne annnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I had windows installed first, then I installed openbsd, what would I
> > type
> > to boot into windows?
>
> Read FAQ 4.8 & FAQ 14.6.
Any maybe Matthew 22:14 ...
There are documents available off of the OpenBSD website that explain how to
set up a dual boot system.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
annne annnie
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 8:07 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: booting a different kerne
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:45:59AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
> > Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
> > of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?
> >
> > One would be violating the copyrig
On 6/22/08, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...
Looking back, I realized the subject question is not the same as the
body question and nobody has answered it. For OpenBSD, the answer is
no, you cannot contribute anonymously.
> If one were to rele
Hello everyone.
I experience some strange network behaviour. My setup is as following:
* ALIX 2c3 hardware, connected to an adsl modem on vr2, pppoe/nat/pf
* internal lan, 10.1.0.0/16 (dhcp on the alix) via switch connected to
vr0 of the alix
This all works perfectly great, with one exception
this is a bug in the vr driver
it's fixed in the current freebsd vr driver which people are attempting to port
over
Manuel Heckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I experience some strange network behaviour. My setup is as following:
> * ALIX 2c3 hardware, connected to an adsl modem
James Hartley wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:07 AM, annne annnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I had windows installed first, then I installed openbsd, what would I type
to boot into windows?
Read FAQ 4.8 & FAQ 14.6.
and pay really, really close attention to the first paragraph of 4.8...
> Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...
>
> If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
> license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
> it was released as public domain?
I guess the actually question you wanted to as was:
Does OpenBSD
Why not launch minicom inside a "screen" session from rc.local? You can
run it as the user you want, if you don't want it running as root.
Cam
Theodore Wynnychenko wrote:
Hello
I am trying to figure out how to modify the boot process to automatically
spawn a minicom session. (I know I have m
2008/6/24 Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...
>>
>> If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
>> license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
>> it was released as public domain?
>
> I guess the act
Hi,
I've updated to the today -current and I can't install packages as I
usually do.
# export
PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386
# pkg_add -vi screen (an example)
No packages available in the PKG_PATH
Can't resolve screen
#
Tried with some mirrors too but without
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've updated to the today -current and I can't install packages as I
> usually do.
>
> # export
> PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386
Note the FAQ 15.2.2 requires a final directory delimiter whic
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 06:56:00PM -0300, Daniel B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated to the today -current and I can't install packages as I
> usually do.
>
> # export
> PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386
man pkg_add
... Since a few URL schemes contain colons, pkg_a
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, James Hartley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've updated to the today -current and I can't install packages as I
> > usually do.
> >
> > # export
> > PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386
>
> Not
does anyone on list know if wireless (e.g. bluetooth) barcode scanners
can or do work with openbsd? couldn't find much information about it
after searching.
the application is inventory tracking, etc, where several users would
concurrently scan and have barcodes register with a single machine.
Sunnz wrote:
2008/6/24 Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...
If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
it was released as public domain?
I gues
Quoting Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
does anyone on list know if wireless (e.g. bluetooth) barcode scanners
can or do work with openbsd? couldn't find much information about it
after searching.
the application is inventory tracking, etc, where several users would
concurrently scan and
I haven't actually checked to see whether anyone has added DJB's software
back into ports/packages, but I seem to recall that djbdns and qmail are
both in the public domain now.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Predrag Punosevac <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sunnz wrote:
>
>> 2008/6/24 Theo de Ra
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
You know what. I just looked the sourceforge.net. more carefully.
There are actually couple of projects (libraries) which can actually
might do exactly what are you asking
You can try to compile something like
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=104233
Marti Martinez wrote:
I haven't actually checked to see whether anyone has added DJB's software
back into ports/packages, but I seem to recall that djbdns and qmail are
both in the public domain now.
I do not think so. His release of the qmail and djbdns to public domain
seems too little to
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:46 -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> In order to compile those
> my understanding (people who use djbdns will correct me on this one) is
> that you need damontools. Those are not released in public domain and I
> believe that they are register trade mark of DJB.
Nope, da
* Marti Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080623 19:23]:
> I haven't actually checked to see whether anyone has added DJB's software
> back into ports/packages, but I seem to recall that djbdns and qmail are
> both in the public domain now.
>
You'll find qmail in the attic. Take a peek in the respec
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Dear Jacob,
That is very interesting question. I was always wondering myself if
it is possible to use those bar code scanners with OpenBSD.
Anyhow, this is what I found.
Obviously bar code scanners work completely differently than
Image scanners which are supported by
Unless I am mistaken, Jake is looking for a barcode scanner. These
are typically not SCSI devices (none that I know of are, at least),
they are typically Serial, PS/2, or USB HID devices. All they do is
translate the barcode scanned into ASCII for processing by some
application. Some newer scan
Tim Donahue wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, Jake is looking for a barcode scanner.
No you are not. That is what I understood.
These are typically not SCSI devices (none that I know of are, at
least), they are typically Serial, PS/2, or USB HID devices.
I was reading that discussion on the SANE
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is a bug in the vr driver
> it's fixed in the current freebsd vr driver which people are attempting to
> port over
>
> Manuel Heckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> I experience some strange networ
Hi,
related to the last message regarding my mouse disappearing, some info
(just connecting to USB):
uhidev0 at uhub1 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 "vendor 0x04f3
PS/2+USB Mouse" rev 1.10/22.90 addr 2
uhidev0: iclass 3/1
ums0 at uhidev0: 3 buttons, Z dir
wsmouse1 at ums0 mux 0
Actually, I c
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:01:57PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
>
> The demise of his qmail is a wonderful example of interesting project which
> died because of the bad "licence". I know that lots of people here like his
> djbdns but just imagine what could have happened with his projects if
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Richard Daemon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Problem with vr NICs loosing network connection]
Will this fix be ported to -stable? In the mean time, what's the
solution to prevent this problem?
It should make it into
41 matches
Mail list logo
