I didn't claim it was a good idea. Anyway, this is all theoretical.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +1000, Sunnz wrote: > Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose > of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you? > > One would be violating the copyright law regardless what name the said > code is released under right? I mean, a third party won't be able to > claim that they are the anonymous person unless they provide evidence, > otherwise they can't change the license or do anything not permitted > by the license, right?