On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:45:59AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +1000, Sunnz wrote: > > Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose > > of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you? > > > > One would be violating the copyright law regardless what name the said > > code is released under right? I mean, a third party won't be able to > > claim that they are the anonymous person unless they provide evidence, > > otherwise they can't change the license or do anything not permitted > > by the license, right? > > I didn't claim it was a good idea. > > Anyway, this is all theoretical.
True. I've been arguing for public domain dedication before. But you'll get an infinet discussion about the legal value of public domain etc. I just stuck with ISC because public domain is not worth all the discussion.
