* Jon Morby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-29 02:56]:
> I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a
> Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems
> with our multihop sessions since the upgrade.
errr... I'm inlcined to say "impossible", since th
Hi all,
using the following setup:
# ifconfig vlan0
vlan0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:13:d4:de:cf:88
vlan: 16 priority: 0 parent interface: sk0
groups: vlan
inet6 fe80::213:d4ff:fede:cf88%
* Jon Morby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-29 11:20]:
> On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> >* Jon Morby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-29 02:56]:
> >>I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a
> >>Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having
On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jon Morby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-29 02:56]:
I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a
Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems
with our multihop sessions since the upgrade.
errr...
On 2007/06/29 10:15, Jon Morby wrote:
> On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
>> * Jon Morby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-29 02:56]:
>>> I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a
>>> Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems
>>> wi
Hi,
I am about to but a second hand thinkpad x40 which looks pretty good
_and_ has APM support (!!). Of course OpenBSD will be installed on it.
Now, the German ebayer is a nice person and I can actually choose
what's going to be the wireless card!
Until now I have only tried intel chips, so tha
"Vim Visual" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And another question: How do these devices compare to the intel pro
> ones? Are they as powerful?
I have both ral and rum devices here, and we're quite happy with
them. In my experience at least they are quite reliable. They are
rather inexpensive too,
Hi Peter,
I have both ral and rum devices here, and we're quite happy with
them. In my experience at least they are quite reliable. They are
rather inexpensive too, the USB versions can can usually be had for 50
euros or less, mini-PCIs even less.
Ops, sorry, I was meaning internal devices!
4.1-current fresed yesterday. see attached dmesg after boot.
in GENERIC ACPIVERBOSE and ACPI_ENABLE enabled.
if i turn off the notebook and turn it on again it sees the battery, but
the model is not read correctly (should be M6V) and there are no useful
info about it:
# sysctl -a | grep ^hw\.s
Hello,
Someone far more experienced than me challenged my take on virtual
hosting setups.
I am accustomed to having virtual users, not real users, doing stuff
with MySQL backends etc.
My ideas now seem to have corrupted that what made me choose OpenBSD in
the first place.
I would like to set
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:34:05 +0100, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Lead is still permitted for some equipment (notably network infrastructure),
>http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002L0095:EN:HT
ML
>annex 7:
>
>- lead in solders for servers, storage and sto
--- Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using OpenBSD 4.0 and I am counting bytes with labels for most
> protocols but with ftp-proxy I do not know how to proceed. How can I
> do this? These are the rules I have in pf.conf:
>
>
> nat-anchor "ftp-proxy/*"
> rdr-anchor "ftp-proxy/
> 1- Check the hardware compatability list to make sure the
> lan card is supported.
> 2- Take a look and make sure the lan card is seated in it's
> slot properly. I have had this happen a few times with
> smaller cards not seating all the way (it's probably
Hi,
I have to come to U.K from 6th July to 15th July.
It would be great if I can find a few OpenBSD users there and see how
your implementations are :-)
Please let me know your contact details off list.
Also let me know if you need something from India :- if i can
afford it I'll get it f
On 29 Jun 2007, at 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up
because it's
the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in
months ...
The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome
things ..
however t
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 11:12:15AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/06/29 10:15, Jon Morby wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> >> * Jon Morby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-29 02:56]:
> >>> I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a
> >>
I have never seen other architectures except x86, amd64, PPC ( thanks
to e-mac ).
Yes I saw a sparc system once but it was not connected to anything and
a few people were around it in an institute trying to make heads and
tails out of lump of metal and find the place where to connect the
keyboard
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:15:14AM +0100, Jon Morby wrote:
> On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> >* Jon Morby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-29 02:56]:
> >>I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a
> >>Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/13150
why this patch has not been committed?
"Vim Visual" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ops, sorry, I was meaning internal devices! I am looking for an
> internal wireless card.
the ordinary PCI bus versions are about the same price or slightly cheaper.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://w
What will you be doing here in UK?
> Hi,
>
> I have to come to U.K from 6th July to 15th July.
> It would be great if I can find a few OpenBSD users there and see how
> your implementations are :-)
>
> Please let me know your contact details off list.
> Also let me know if you need something from
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:06:59PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> I have to come to U.K from 6th July to 15th July.
> It would be great if I can find a few OpenBSD users there and see how
> your implementations are :-)
I'm not 100% sure on the dates, but I believe you will just miss the
Manchester BS
On 6/29/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username
webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so
httpd can access/write to their dir as well.
Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas?
You don't want the www user
Darren Spruell schreef:
On 6/29/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username
webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so
httpd can access/write to their dir as well.
Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas?
Yo
Thank you so much Darrin and Michael for your responses :-)
Hope I will be lucky enough to have time and oppourtunity.
On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What will you be doing here in UK?
Well...
Well..
Now who told you to ask that
On 6/29/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) Chroot jails / limited shells - do's and don'ts
I understand the implications of chroot jails. I understand they are not
worth the risk. Which is a shame really as they bring certain
functionality (or limits if you will) that I would consider nice t
Hmm, are there no competent OpenBSD user/programmer/administrator/whatever in
the UK?
They should inform me, I been into OpenBSD since 2.6 and now they have to
import someone
from a different timezone just to do that while I am here basically several
hours by
train -).
That is not classified an
Stuart,
> I'm far from a guru, but looking at your dmesg I don't see
> a lan card there at all. Here are the first few steps:
>
> 1- Check the hardware compatability list to make sure the
> lan card is supported.
> 2- Take a look and make sure the lan card is seated in it's
>
3) Mail setups
I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been
succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years
now, connected to a webbased mailmanagement tool.
If I was to drop all that in favor of a more 'core' OpenBSD setup - what
would be a nice maintainab
Brian,
> > 1- Check the hardware compatability list to make sure the
> > lan card is supported.
> > 2- Take a look and make sure the lan card is seated in it's
> > slot properly. I have had this happen a few times with
> > smaller cards not seating all the wa
On 6/29/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 3) Mail setups
>>
>> I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been
>> succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years
>> now, connected to a webbased mailmanagement tool.
>> If I was to drop all that i
The unarj v2.43 archiver we have for use with clamav virus scanning does
not really work. The same is true for the newer 2.65 version released
by the author. The problem is unarj is unable to extract with paths,
hence it will overwrite files and stuff won't actually be scanned.
At the moment, I
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 03:16:36PM +0200, St?phane Chausson wrote:
> Brian Candler wrote, On 29/06/07 14:43:
> >Also, under Linux, "lspci -v" gives useful info about the PCI cards you
> >have
> >installed. In theory, you should be able to do this with OpenBSD too:
> >http://mj.ucw.cz/pciutils.shtm
Daniel Ouellet schreef:
3) Mail setups
I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been
succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years
i like virtual mail users.
I am curious about this statement here. Care to provide more details?
The setup I have been
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:40:56PM -0700, John Mendenhall wrote:
> I booted an ultimate boot disk, with several small linux distros
> on them. None of them found the card.
I'd personally go with a full-sized Linux distro, as it's more likely to
have a complete driver set, but it does seem more li
Almir Karic wrote:
if you have trully big setups you might wanna look at ldap, from what
i've heard/read it should perform well under heavy read intensive
operations.
I always see a lots of LDAP talks and some documents on it for many
things including managing multiples users on multiples serv
On 6/29/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Almir Karic wrote:
> if you have trully big setups you might wanna look at ldap, from what
> i've heard/read it should perform well under heavy read intensive
> operations.
I always see a lots of LDAP talks and some documents on it for many
t
On 6/29/07, Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given that your on-board LAN isn't working either, maybe the motherboard has
a serious fault. But you might not be able to return it until you can prove
that *Windows* can't find any network cards either :-)
that's simple, create a screen se
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:41:49PM +0200, Almir Karic wrote:
> >> i like virtual mail users.
I don't. But that's me.
>
> if you have relativelly few users the postfix hashes should do the
> trick, there is one annoyance tho, after every edit you have to run
> postmap (easily solvable by wrapper
> I am doing this in a 1U box, so there is a pci 1u
> riser card. Could it be the riser is bad?
Maybe, you could remove the bracket from a PCI card and try it with
the case lid off and no riser for a test (and other slots if you have
any)..
Have a look for leaky capacitors while you're there, if
Trying to set up a fairly heavy duty web server I encountered boot
problems with this fairly new machine using the release CD ROM. Using the
-c command at the boot prompt I already see error messages, before it
gives me the UKC> ...
UVM_PAGE_PHYSLOAD: unable to load physical memory segment
5
41 matches
Mail list logo
