On 29 Jun 2007, at 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up
because it's
the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in
months ...
The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome
things ..
however the next hops should be learnt by ospf and are reachable
(otherwise
the bgp sessions wouldn't actually be up, which they are)
Are the nexthops in subnets where you receive the same exact prefixes
by both BGP and OSPF? I have found ospfd sometimes doesn't overwrite
routes installed by bgpd. That's not new though..
Yup .. most likely ...
certainly qualifying via bgp seems to have solved things for the time
being
