Hi folks,
is there anybody out there who can share some
experiences with such a device ?
I'm especially interested in reports about the X setup,
as this device got a wide screen display.
Thx in advance,
Stefan Sonnenberg
Kilaru Sambaiah wrote:
Hello All,
I am linux administrator and use iptables for firewall. I use
shorewall, which you
need to be setting up only policy based on your box is having one
interface or
two interfaces or three. Policy, zone, interfaces, rules these are all
I need to edit.
Is th
Nick Holland wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Joe Advisor wrote:
Congrats on the cool OpenBSD SAN installation. I was
wondering how you are dealing with the relatively
large filesystem. By default, if you lose power to
the server, OpenBSD will do a rather long fsck wh
hmm, on Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 07:53:52AM +0200, morla said that
> i just made up a second account on my box and wanted to prevent the old
> one from loging into it, due i want to keep it for email retrival.
i am not 100% sure what "retrival" means, but if you want to
keep the account only for rece
per engelbrecht wrote:
> Nick Holland wrote:
...
>> Would I love to see the 1T limit removed? Sure. HOWEVER, I think I
>> would handle this application the exact same way if it didn't exist
>> (that might not be true: I might foolishly plowed ahead with the One Big
>> Pile philosophy, and regrett
Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
>From: Rico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>>Reading the last couple of days of sftp/scp's posts and reading up on
>>the achives I just wanted to ask..
>>
>>Would it be a bad idea to extend OpenSSH with some extra feaures like:
>>
>>1. In sshd_config - making it poss
hmm, on Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:01:18PM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
> This has been a public service announcement, paid for by the "Friends
> of Civilized Vendors" economic-action committee. The FCV reminds you;
> FCV also stands for "Fuck Closed Vendors!" >;->
and fuck closed www ports for
Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
Ashley Moran wrote:
fw1# cat /etc/hostname.carp0
inet 192.168.67.3 255.255.255.0 192.168.67.255 carpdev rl0 vhid 1 pass
mycarp
fw2# cat /etc/hostname.carp0
inet 192.168.67.3 255.255.255.0 192.168.67.255 carpdev rl0 vhid 1
advskew 10 pass mycarpstudio
Could it
Hello there,
I have 2 openbsd box (that does as well openbgpd but this is not the aim
of this mail).
Question is that any problems to do
sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt=1
and
ifconfig em0 up
ifconfig vlan0 vlan 11 vlandev em0
ifconfig carp0 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vhid 1 carpdev vlan0
brad@ had committed a fix that worked for me, that allowed the dual
port's to show up. (mine were PCI-Express). The fix should be in 3.8
em0 at pci5 dev 4 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB)" rev 0x03: irq
10, address: 00:0e:0c:71:83:2c
em1 at pci5 dev 4 function 1 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB)
per,
>We can argue back and forth on the pros and cons of building
>1TB
>partitions or not, but the need for these giant allocations
are real
>enough and from a commen/broader view (small business) the
demand is
>also moving closer and closer. At work we have a disk-to-disk
backup
>server for
* dormando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-21 01:08]:
> Did you make any other configuration changes?
>
> Right now my box is doing ~28,000pps per direction per interface (out
> public, in public, out internal, in internal), totalling around
> 112kpps. It doesn't seem to want to go any higher than th
> i can certainly see how this would be annoying from a
> scalability standpoint, but how often are you changing user
> storage limits? it would, however, be most convenient to just
> have one huge-ass partition :).
>
Annoying from a scalability standpoint? gimme a break. one huge
filesy
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:59:12 +0200
Guido Tschakert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> Kilaru Sambaiah wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > I am linux administrator and use iptables for firewall. I use
> > shorewall, which you
> > need to be setting up only policy based on your box is having one
> > interface o
I was just curious if any of the developers (or experts) would care to
articulate officially >:}
~BAS
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, William Bloom wrote:
> The PF queueing FAQ page at http://www.openbsd.org has a wealth of info that
> seems to nicely clarify the pf.conf man page. I recall that the FAQ
Ever wanted to use the ipod whilst charging it via USB, on OpenBSD?
I found a nice feature for scsi devices. I'm not sure if eject was
designed with this in mind, but it works.
$ eject /dev/rsd0c
Why you may want do this? When an ipod is plugged in via USB, you cannot
make use of it's menu. Ejec
Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
Ashley Moran wrote:
fw1# cat /etc/hostname.carp0
inet 192.168.67.3 255.255.255.0 192.168.67.255 carpdev rl0 vhid 1 pass
mycarp
fw2# cat /etc/hostname.carp0
inet 192.168.67.3 255.255.255.0 192.168.67.255 carpdev rl0 vhid 1
advskew 10 pass mycarpstudio
Could it
On 10/20/05, Ed Wandasiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3.8-current now provides scsi access for all ipods, including the nano.
>
If apple only knew that I was waiting for this so that I could plug an
ipod into my zaurus. What a great advertising campaign that would
be...
Mike
well, I did numerous times in the past.
th emisunderstanding most of you have is that queue assignment and th
actual queueing are sepearate things.
you assign a queue with the name X somewhere, be it by a rule in the
inbound path or the outbound, or a state in either direction, and when
we hit
Happy Birthday OpenBSD!
My daughter almost has the same birthday at OpenBSD:
My wife gave birth to a baby girl yesterday at 4:38pm!!!
I bought a CD and the baby T-shirt (although it may take a while before she
can wear it)
Congrats to Theo and his gang for their hard work!!!
Regards,
Kevin R.
Hi OpenBSD fans!
My 3.8 CD preorder is sent also!
I am waiting nervous for the 3.8 release!
Thanks to all guys!
Ramiro.
I have a simple c++ program that throws an exception and tries to catch it.
But when I run it, it crashes with segmentation faul. Looking and the stack
trace, looks like the exception is thrown but no one catches it. Is this a
bug? There's a workaround?
The c++ file is:
---
include
int main(void
> > Right now my box is doing ~28,000pps per direction per interface (out
> > public, in public, out internal, in internal), totalling around
> > 112kpps. It doesn't seem to want to go any higher than that. I've just
> > tried moving the internal connection off of the dualport PCI-X card
> > and on
> I have a simple c++ program that throws an exception and tries to catch it.
> But when I run it, it crashes with segmentation faul. Looking and the stack
> trace, looks like the exception is thrown but no one catches it. Is this a
> bug? There's a workaround?
Not sure when, but this has been fix
On 10/21/05, Ramiro Aceves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi OpenBSD fans!
>
> My 3.8 CD preorder is sent also!
> I am waiting nervous for the 3.8 release!
Nervous? You must mean anxious :) One of the main reasons I love
OpenBSD is because there is so much less to be nervous about!
Mike
Looking at uaudio.c, uaudio_add_selector, it punts to
printf("uaudio_add_selector: NOT IMPLEMENTED\n");
Obviously not a cut and paste job, but it looks like NetBSD has added support
in their recent uaudio.c.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/usb/uaudio.c?rev=1.99&content
-type=text/x
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Hello there,
I have 2 openbsd box (that does as well openbgpd but this is not the aim
of this mail).
Question is that any problems to do
sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt=1
and
ifconfig em0 up
ifconfig vlan0 vlan 11 vlandev em0
Each machine must hav
On Thursday 20 October 2005 19:01, you wrote:
>Currently tracking 30+ pieces of hardware. However, I need help: I
>need people to email me supported hardware, or use the "Submit New
> Kit" link on the page to do it. It's pretty easy, and the only
> requirement is that you need to have personally
You said you "entered" into those files. Did you vi(1) them mnaually?
Did you rebuild the database afterward? When you finger the user, what
does the shell show up as? Use either vipw(8) as root, to do this, or
use chfn(1) as the user.
~BAS
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, morla wrote:
hello all,
i
Well, the problem is that with OpenBSD 3.7 other thing doesn't work
(php4-xslt makes apache crash when used), and OpenBSD 3.8 is no yet released
officially.
On 10/21/05, Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a simple c++ program that throws an exception and tries to catch
> it.
> >
Hi all,
I have 2 Rasta 4801 (3.7 current) as a master and backup carp. One solaris 10
server is behind them. When I try to scp a 600MB file from 1 solaris server
outside the network to the solaris server behind the net4801, I get "network
error: connection reset by peer" error.
If I halt the maste
On 10/21/05, Gordon Willem Klok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Gordon Willem Klok dixit:
> >
> >
> >>#define MSR_AMDK7_FIDVID_CTL 0xc0010041
> >>#define MSR_AMDK7_FIDVID_STATUS 0xc0010042
> >>
> >>/* Bitfields used by K8 */
> >
> >
> > Can't that be m
More to the point, "how to find this info".
1: Go to http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi
2: click "apropos"
3: make sure "current" is selected
4: query "sync"
5: click on "sasynchd(8)" and "sasychd.conf(5)"
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sasyncd&sektion=8&apropos=0&manpath=OpenB
Hi all,
I have 2 Rasta 4801 (3.7 current) as a master and backup carp. One solaris 10
server is behind them. When I try to scp a 600MB file from 1 solaris server
outside the network to the solaris server behind the net4801, I get "network
error: connection reset by peer" error.
If I halt the maste
If a TCP flow is egressing an interface at 2000k/s (17-18mbps), it might
be causing as much as 300kbps of "ACK" traffic. That traffic really
doesn't get queued on return at the same inteface it's egressing.
However, I have noticed that, if a traffic flow is passing through a
router (say, the
Please note that at this time,
sasyncd can fail IPSEC associations to a 2nd machine
But not yet fail them back, when the master recovers
The developer of this stuff hasn't finished it yet.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:16:13PM -0300, Sebastian Cufre wrote:
> Well, the problem is that with OpenBSD 3.7 other thing doesn't work
> (php4-xslt makes apache crash when used), and OpenBSD 3.8 is no yet released
> officially.
>
> On 10/21/05, Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I
It seems that tar(1) is only able to archive filenames of 100 characters or
less. However, ufs can handle (I've been testing using touch(1)) filenames
up to 255 characters. I tried to modify the following in src/bin/pax/tar.h
#define TNMSZ 100 /* size of name field */
to
#d
On Oct 21, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Sebastian Cufre wrote:
Well, the problem is that with OpenBSD 3.7 other thing doesn't work
(php4-xslt makes apache crash when used), and OpenBSD 3.8 is no yet
released
officially.
And if you'd pre-ordered 3.8 then you might have gotten an email like
I did tod
It's not a bug, it's a feature. Thank POSIX.2 which specifies for
ustar that the total pathname must be 255 chars or less and the
filename must be 100 chars or less.
go read pax(1)
-Bob
* eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-21 13:15]:
> It seems that tar(1) is only able to
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:07:16PM -0500, eric wrote:
> It seems that tar(1) is only able to archive filenames of 100 characters or
> less. However, ufs can handle (I've been testing using touch(1)) filenames
> up to 255 characters. I tried to modify the following in src/bin/pax/tar.h
You can't do
Chad M Stewart wrote:
And if you'd pre-ordered 3.8 then you might have gotten an email like I
did today. :-) Now I just need enough revenue from my new company so I
can replace all of my "servers" with real boxes like V20z and X4100.
Funny now that I'm now longer an employee of Sun I'll p
I'll see if I can cobble some docs together or at least submit an example
sasync.conf file. I pre-ordered 3.8, and am _now_ eagerly looking forward to
bringing this up. I was not asking the list for a howto, I really had not even
heard about this feature. The man page seems pretty straight f
Sorry all a soekris 4801 not rasta, my mistake.
Hi all,
I have 2 Rasta 4801 (3.7 current) as a master and backup carp. One solaris 10
server is behind them. When I try to scp a 600MB file from 1 solaris server
outside the network to the solaris server behind the net4801, I get "network
error: co
Daniel A. Ramaley wrote:
I submitted the Adaptec 1205 SA to your list. I put it in my OpenBSD 3.7
machine and it just worked.
The drive plugged into the 1205 is wd1. I believe these are the relevant
dmesg lines:
pciide1 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "CMD Technology SiI3112 SATA" rev
0x02: DMA
frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:01:18PM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
This has been a public service announcement, paid for by the "Friends
of Civilized Vendors" economic-action committee. The FCV reminds you;
FCV also stands for "Fuck Closed Vendors!" >;->
and fuck
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:07:16PM -0500, eric wrote:
> It seems that tar(1) is only able to archive filenames of 100 characters or
> less. However, ufs can handle (I've been testing using touch(1)) filenames
> up to 255 characters. I tried to modify the following in src/bin/pax/tar.h
>
> #define
On 10/21/05, Szechuan Death <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> frantisek holop wrote:
> > hmm, on Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:01:18PM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
> >> This has been a public service announcement, paid for by the "Friends
> >> of Civilized Vendors" economic-action committee. The FCV remin
Folks who keep track of cvs changes might have noticed a barrage of commits
regarding ipmi(4). The driver is functionally complete but needs wide testing
on both amd64 and i386 architectures. Jordan Hargrave (jordan@) wrote most of
the code.
Let's talk a bit about ipmi(4).
Okay, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having heard the whining about my apparently unpopular
policy WRT netblocks in certain filthy, spammer-ridden Third World
shitholes that should be nuked from orbit to protect the Internet
from their miserable spams, SSH scans, and generally bogus traffic,
and after searchi
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:57:18PM -0800, Szechuan Death wrote:
> Okay, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having heard the whining about my apparently
> unpopular
> policy WRT netblocks in certain filthy, spammer-ridden Third World
> shitholes that should be nuked from orbit to protect the Internet
Why block ac
Gordon Grieder wrote:
Why block access to your website in an attempt to block spam? Spam
harvesters? If so it's pointless, these lists are archived all over the
net, your address is already out there.
No, I just block netblocks because I don't care about any traffic
from those countries, whose
Hi misc@
Reading through the misc@ archives, I see that back in 2003, it was said, to a
similar query to mine [0] that:
> also, be aware that if there's any kind of NAT involved, the SNMP payloads
> will not be translated, so you'll need to be prepared to deal with it.
I was wondering if this wa
On Oct 21, 2005, at 10:13 PM, Szechuan Death wrote:
Gordon Grieder wrote:
Why block access to your website in an attempt to block spam? Spam
harvesters? If so it's pointless, these lists are archived all
over the
net, your address is already out there.
No, I just block netblocks because I
On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:09 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
If your box supports IPMI you'll see a similar line in dmesg.
ipmi0 at mainbus0: version 1.0 interface SMIC iobase 0xecf4/3
spacing 1
Great, now how does that help me?
The driver retrieves ipmi readings and publishes them via the
sysctl i
Jason Dixon wrote:
I have no intention of starting a flamewar with you, so please take this
as constructive criticism, not a throwing down of the gauntlet, as it
were.
Tragically, it is not constructive, and yes, it is very much a request
for a flamewar. It contains nothing of value; it can
On Oct 22, 2005, at 12:14 AM, Szechuan Death wrote:
Good luck with that MetaStore thing. I'm sure it's going to be a
huge success.
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 16:57:18 -0800, Szechuan Death proclaimed...
> Okay, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having heard the whining about my apparently
> unpopular
> policy WRT netblocks in certain filthy, spammer-ridden Third World
> shitholes that should be nuked from orbit to protect the Internet
> from th
On Friday 21 October 2005 18:07, Gareth Nelson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any ideas on if this can be loaded by the OpenBSD bootloader or if it's
> possible to run a memory test in a booted system?
(redirected to misc@ where it belongs)
Sure, its possible, but why would you want to? Get the CD version
of m
Jason Dixon wrote:
Good luck with that MetaStore thing. I'm sure it's going to be a huge
success.
Thank you, although the goal is not that it be a "success" for me,
but rather that it will provide useful information to OpenBSD users
and assistance to the OpenBSD development team in negotia
Please take this off our lists. I am sure noone cares.
> > Why block access to your website in an attempt to block spam? Spam
> > harvesters? If so it's pointless, these lists are archived all over the
> > net, your address is already out there.
>
> No, I just block netblocks because I don't ca
On 10/21/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i can certainly see how this would be annoying from a
> > scalability standpoint, but how often are you changing user
> > storage limits? it would, however, be most convenient to just
> > have one huge-ass partition :).
> >
>
> Annoying f
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:43:11 -0800, Szechuan Death <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Dixon wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Good luck with that MetaStore thing. I'm sure it's going to be a huge
>> success.
>
> Thank you, although the goal is not that it be a "success" for me,
> but rather that it will provid
63 matches
Mail list logo
