I'm able to get sensor data from the BIOS; is there something I'm
missing to be able to get them from within OpenBSD on this system? dmesg
follows...
OpenBSD 3.7-current (GENERIC) #1: Sat Jul 30 19:44:49 CDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: AMD-K7(tm) Processor
Hi,
we have a mostly RH Linux environment were the PCs authenticate
against a Netscape LDAP server. They have a quite short /etc/ldap.conf:
host 172.25.93.242 <-- that is our LDAP server
base o=bonmp.XXX.com
ssl no
pam_password crypt
And I'm tryi
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 02:14:38 -0500
"Shawn K. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm able to get sensor data from the BIOS; is there something I'm
> missing to be able to get them from within OpenBSD on this system? dmesg
> follows...
Your hardware sensor, whatever it is is, isn't supported.
---
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 15:44 +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> Your hardware sensor, whatever it is is, isn't supported.
Okay, next question: where in the dmesg is it? Does it show up in the
dmesg at all?
--
Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:43:28AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
> Also, does anybody know, how to run /usr/local/libexec/auth/login_-ldap
> on a command line, to see if it works at all? I try following:
>
> blowfish# /usr/local/libexec/auth/login_-ldap afarber
> blowfish# echo $?
>
> > Would a hardware el-cheapo raid-controller be of any help in a way
> > that the joe-user standard setup procedure will work ?
>
> If your mobo supports booting from the controller that would
> probably be the easies way, just create the array and install
> onto it just as if it had been a n
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:06:34AM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 15:44 +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> > Your hardware sensor, whatever it is is, isn't supported.
>
> Okay, next question: where in the dmesg is it? Does it show up in the
> dmesg at all?
since the most of sensor
On Thursday, August 4, "Stefan Sczekalla-Waldschmidt" wrote:
> > > Would a hardware el-cheapo raid-controller be of any help in a way
> > > that the joe-user standard setup procedure will work ?
> >
> > If your mobo supports booting from the controller that would
> > probably be the easies way,
2005/8/4, John Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> /usr/libexec/auth/login_-ldap -d afarber should be more verbose.
>
Thank you, now I get:
blowfish# /usr/local/libexec/auth/login_-ldap -d afarber
Password:
couldn't get x-ldap-server
reject
Aug 4 10:11:43 blow
Here is what I get on the command line
(a "result: 0 Success", so I wonder why does login_-ldap fail?)
blowfish# ldapsearch -x -h 172.25.93.242 \
-b o=bonmp.XXX.com "(uid=afarber)"
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base with scope sub
# filter: (uid=afarber)
# requesting: ALL
#
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:47:00AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
> # base with scope sub
Maybe the scope? If I'm reading the code correctly the default is onelevel
(or "-s one" on the ldapsearch command line) but the default for ldapsearch
is subtree.
On 8/4/05, Z L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed OBSD3.7 on my laptop. Things that are not working are:
> sound and modem (dial-up internal laptop modem) and apm.
Apart from providing the *complete* dmesg output already requested by
someone else, you will also want to check the notes on the
2005/8/4, John Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:47:00AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
> > # base with scope sub
>
> Maybe the scope? If I'm reading the code correctly the default is onelevel
> (or "-s one" on the ldapsearch command line) but the default for ldapsearch
>
> Apart from providing the *complete* dmesg output already requested by
> someone else
Below is the complete dmesg output:
OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC) #50: Sun Mar 20 00:01:57 MST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz ("GenuineI
hi:
my content of pf.conf is
#set macros
ext_if="vr0"
int_if="bge0"
ext_ip="222.185.xxx.xxx"
int_ip="192.168.0.1"
webserver="192.168.0.2"
priv_net="{127.0.0.0/8,192.168.0.0/16,172.16.0.0/12,10.0.0.0/8}"
scrub in all
#give NAT to the internal address
nat on $ext_if from $webserver to any ->$ext_
Hello from The Motley Fool.
Please click the link below to create a Motley Fool password. Once you do, you
will have access to areas of Fool.com that require a password:
http://www.fool.com/EditPassword.asp?U=184191259&C=0F4849F393EA0204&FP=1
Need Help?
If you experience problems creating a p
Running a recent snapshot (a few days ago) ospfd seems to have a problem
with correctly joining an ospf area unless it's router-priority is 0
or higher than the current BDR. Ospfd is here connected to our ospf backbone
wich is a mix of openbsd boxes running gated, Huawei 1760's and Cisco's
running
Hi,
I've disabled AH in my sysctl.conf but it doesn't work...
No I have been trying to do with OpenVPN. After read all how-to, and
some samples the connection successfull with 2 obsd behind routers.
It's very simple to do... I can see servers, but, how can I do to
check my connections is encrypted
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:28:32AM -0400, Brandon Mercer wrote:
> I've tried running the debug, but I
> can't figure out which part of the proposal is incompatible. My config has:
when i had to setup a tunnel against a speedstream 5930 ( dsl modem/router ),
i told the speedstream to make an
Can people who are able to test SATA on any nForce board mail
me off list?
There's no /etc/mygate. That's why I suggested hardwiring the IP.
But in your case there was, so this is completely another issue.
> From: Alexis de BRUYN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:23 PM
> To: Schvberle Daniel; misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: RE: openbsd 3.7 in-
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:49:58PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> Running a recent snapshot (a few days ago) ospfd seems to have a problem
> with correctly joining an ospf area unless it's router-priority is 0
> or higher than the current BDR. Ospfd is here connected to our ospf backbone
> wich is a
Helio Santana wrote:
> Hi,
> I've disabled AH in my sysctl.conf but it doesn't work...
>
> No I have been trying to do with OpenVPN. After read all how-to, and
> some samples the connection successfull with 2 obsd behind routers.
> It's very simple to do... I can see servers, but, how can I do to
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:39:57 +0159
Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you test the following diff and see if this fixes the problem.
> It looks like the RFC is busted and we need to find out how to fix it
> without generating more troubles.
Getting the CVS as I type and will test as s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ya ..I could test it
Bye
Matteo
Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Can people who are able to test SATA on any nForce board mail
> me off list?
iD8DBQFC0lwE/TjXD9LUVswRAjQfAJ4tC4p05yvI9b1Xz4KpG0n9xTr2BwCfQxqL
4UvYnTItQViOd+OotekeeNk=
=WKFS
-END PGP SIGNATUR
Hi all,
Implementing carp, I have 2 net4801's that seem to be synchronizing, when I do
a ifconfig -a on the secondary I see carp0 on the slave becomes Master when
the primary goes down.
The internal machines are working fine accessing the internet and all.
The pf.conf rule has the 2 rules:
pass
On Thursday, August 04, 2005 Monah Baki wrote:
> However when I physiclly remove the ethernet cable from sis0
> on the master, the internal machine cannot access the net anymore.
> Do I need to copy the pf.conf from the master to the scondary
> unit, have them both identical
Sorry about my
On Thursday, August 04, 2005 Monah Baki wrote:
> However when I physiclly remove the ethernet cable from sis0
> on the master, the internal machine cannot access the net anymore.
> Do I need to copy the pf.conf from the master to the scondary
> unit, have them both identical
arp cache on t
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:26:52 -0600 (MDT), Diana Eichert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>just use some 50cal BMG rounds, that should be effective ammunition.
>
>sorry, I just had to after following this thread for awhile
I think you're taking the phrase "Bullet-Proof Software" a bit too
literally. ;-)
Hello All,
I'm trying to build a vpn between an OpenBSD and a Linux Router. (If I
could, I would directly replace the linux box to simplify matters ;-)
but that's not possible at the moment :-(
BTW: I want to use RSA-based authentication using x509 certificates. I
have already build the CA a
Hi,
yes, this howto is basically unmaintained since, uhm, several years
and I actually should remove it.
However, I have configs for interop with Openswan (don't know what's
different to Freeswan) somewhere, will dig them out tonight...
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:09:56PM +0200, Guido Tschakert w
> -Original Message-
> From: Monah Baki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 8:29 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Stupid Carp question
>
> Hi all,
>
> Implementing carp, I have 2 net4801's that seem to be
> synchronizing, when I do
> a ifconfig -a on the seco
On Jul 27 09:31 AM, Jan Sepp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am creating a shell script that gathers PF statistics for my various
> interfaces, as in pfctl -i <> -vvsI . (Yes, I am aware of the
> existence of rpfcd, but as I want to monitor only one local box and
> write the output directly to console, th
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:28:49AM -0400, Monah Baki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Implementing carp, I have 2 net4801's that seem to be synchronizing, when I do
> a ifconfig -a on the secondary I see carp0 on the slave becomes Master when
> the primary goes down.
> The internal machines are working fine a
Jan Sepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The answer was surprisingly simple. I just had to create a second pf
> device, chown it and make it read-only for the new owner, and I could get
> my statistics. These are the actual commands:
>
> soekris # mknod /dev/pf2 c 73 0
> soekris # chown myUser /dev
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:39:57 +0159
Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you test the following diff and see if this fixes the problem.
No go, still the same problem with router-priority set to 1 and now i doesnt
work with router-priority set to 0 either. Other routers shows it as
2way/d
hey all,
how i can use non-prased headers in apache ?!?
i have mod_perl installed!
im using CGI written in perl.
this is my script:
(i have used a famous one)
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
$server_protocol = $ENV{'SERVER_PROTOCOL'};
$server_software = $ENV{'SERVER_SOFTWARE'};
print "$server_protocol 20
* Ami Emanuel Bizamcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-04 17:58]:
> how i can use non-prased headers in apache ?!?
maybe by reading the supplied documentation...
> i have mod_perl installed!
> im using CGI written in perl.
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler Apache::Registry
PerlSe
i have tryed what you said but i get nothing...
i just waits for the loop to finish then sends the data.
i also checked the output directly
echo "GET /cgi-bin/somefile.pl" | nc 127.0.0.1 80
but no output came out
(also plz direct me to the supplied documentation)
thanks,
ami.
On 8/4/05, Henn
Hi.
I researched this on MARC, and while I did find posts relating
to it, I found no definitive answer as to how to solve the problem.
I setup two firewalls, each with in/dmz/out/sync interfaces - 4
interfaces each. preempt=1,forward=1,allow=1
I have basic failover working great, but if
Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
On Aug 04 05:21 PM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
> Jan Sepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The answer was surprisingly simple. I just had to create a second pf
> > device, chown it and make it read-only for the new owner, and I could get
> > my statistics. These are the actual commands:
> >
> > soek
On Thursday, August 4, Ed White wrote:
>
> Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
Can you enlighten me how that would improve security?
If you can show me a way that does not break the unix/posix
model of the universe, I'm all ears.
--Toby.
On 8/4/05, Ed White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/machdep.c has:
#if defined(I486_CPU) || defined(I586_CPU) || defined(I686_CPU)
/*
* On a 486 or above, enable ring 0 write prot
> Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
Ed,
Will you please stop asking uneducated questions like that?
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 17:56:06 +0200, Ed White proclaimed...
> Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
>
No, so go back to using Windows and leave us alone.
On 8/4/05, Scott Call <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:07 -0500, Tom Kegerreis wrote:
> > Despite everything we've been told, Eschelon went public today. ESCH
> > on the Nasdaq
>
> There was an all "associates" call about an hour ago where they made it
> pretty clear they wer
oh snap. hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] sorry!
On 8/4/05, Karsten McMinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/4/05, Scott Call <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:07 -0500, Tom Kegerreis wrote:
> > > Despite everything we've been told, Eschelon went public today. ESCH
> > > on the Nasdaq
>
On 8/4/05, Tom Kegerreis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previous calls had all said it would be at the end of the year - thats what
> I meant
>
> And since I work nights, I was asleep during the surprise conference call
> :-)
yea its kind of a odd feeling aint it??
remember back in the day
"w
On Thursday 04 August 2005 10:56 am, Ed White wrote:
> Is there any plan to use x86 cpus rings (0..3) to improve OpenBSD security?
Intel VanderPool and AMD Pacifica Virtual PC technologies will add
the equivalent of ring(-1) to the x86 architecture. This new hardware
capability will permit multipl
> Can you enlighten me how that would improve security?
I'm not saying that rings improve security. In fact I'm asking *if* there is
any plan to use them to improve security.
I think that OpenBSD (and Linux and Windows) uses ring 0 for kernel and ring 3
for userland. I was asking if they planne
I am setting up new firewall running OpenBSD 3.7. I am trying to
implement rules using tagging. I ran into trouble with the following
line:
nat on $ext_if tagged LAN_INET tag LAN_INET_NAT -> ($ext_if)
I get the following error:
/etc/pf.conf:16: syntax error
I am starting with a sample rule se
> However, I think that the "uneducated" answer by Theo means "no".
No, what I mean is that asking a stupid question, which shows you did
NO WORK AT ALL TO LEARN ABOUT THIS, just makes you look like some
low-grade slashdot dumbfuck.
You heard about rings somewhere. Whooptie doo. You didn't even
Matt Provost wrote:
On Aug 04 05:21 PM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Jan Sepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The answer was surprisingly simple. I just had to create a second pf
device, chown it and make it read-only for the new owner, and I could get
my statistics. These are the actual comman
Ed,
Ever read anything about MIT's Multics and the GE 645?
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>I'm able to get sensor data from the BIOS; is there something I'm
>missing to be able to get them from within OpenBSD on this system? dmesg
>follows...
>
>
Give xmbmon a try.
Rickard.
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Roland Penner wrote:
I am setting up new firewall running OpenBSD 3.7. I am trying to
implement rules using tagging. I ran into trouble with the following
line:
nat on $ext_if tagged LAN_INET tag LAN_INET_NAT -> ($ext_if)
I get the following error:
/etc/pf.conf:16: syntax
Anyone on this list can help ?!?
On 8/4/05, Ami Emanuel Bizamcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have tryed what you said but i get nothing...
> i just waits for the loop to finish then sends the data.
>
> i also checked the output directly
> echo "GET /cgi-bin/somefile.pl" | nc 127.0.0.1 80
>
>
I've been trying to figure this out for a while now. I've consulted
the man pages for ath, ifconfig, and dhclient. I've checked the
mailing lists, and done many searches, even looking at Free and NetBSD
examples... but I am stumped.
I bought for my Dell Inspiron 5150 laptop a DWL-650. Hardware
I remember asking how to stop syslogd opening udp port 514 a while ago
and never doing anything about it, here goes again...
hopefully a relevant part of /etc/rc
echo 'starting system logger'
rm -f /dev/log
if [ "X${named_flags}" != X"NO" ]; then
rm -f /var/named/dev/log
syslogd
Unless I am very much mistaken, this is Unix not Multics.
To do anything with the rings, you must make userland
into a three-ring circus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:05 PM
To: Theo de Raadt
Cc
The port is also used to (potentially) send data out to other syslog
servers. Therefore, it is left open. This is made ASTOUNDINGLY
clear in the manual page, if you would read it:
syslogd opens the above described socket whether or not it is running in
secure mode. If syslogd is runni
On Thursday, August 4, poncenby wrote:
>
> I remember asking how to stop syslogd opening udp port 514 a while ago
> and never doing anything about it, here goes again...
And people asked you to search the archives.
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state)
>
On 8/4/05, poncenby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember asking how to stop syslogd opening udp port 514 a while ago
> and never doing anything about it, here goes again...
Sure, syslogd opens UDP/514, but unless you use the '-u' flag the very
next thing it does is call shutdown(), which preven
Hey folks,
i have written a piece of code i would like to test with openbsd on
soekris hardware. My work is a replacement for DJB CDB with a the nice
BSD license.
I wonder if some in this list could provide me such environment in the
following sense:
0) grant me a shell access for doing my tests
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 15:29 +0200, Massimo wrote:
> I've made up a test LAN built on two mini-ITX Via C3 based board to test
> the AES encryption functionality of this CPU on a real setup.
>
> I've used flashboot 0.7.2 from Damien simply for a matter of time (I've
> some flash card already configu
On Thursday 04 August 2005 04:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unless I am very much mistaken, this is Unix not Multics.
> To do anything with the rings, you must make userland
> into a three-ring circus.
That is precisely the point. The C programming language and Unix are
incompatible with the
if it's in userland you don't need to do anything
special for it to run on "soekris hardware" i386 is i386 is
i386. Have you run your stuff on OpenBSD i386?
-Bob
* Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-04 16:31]:
> Hey folks,
>
> i have written a piece of code i would like
Yeah!
On 8/4/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> if it's in userland you don't need to do anything
> special for it to run on "soekris hardware" i386 is i386 is
> i386. Have you run your stuff on OpenBSD i386?
>
> -Bob
>
>
> * Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-0
Hello, I have been reading this thread as of some interest that I have read
some stuff on rings.
Are you able to elaborate on C programming and Unix incompatible with x86.
Does this mean that other architectures such as Alpha, SGI and Sparc more
compatible?
Thank you,
rogern
From: Dave Feus
On Thursday 04 August 2005 06:24 pm, Roger Neth Jr wrote:
> Hello, I have been reading this thread as of some interest that I have read
> some stuff on rings.
> Are you able to elaborate on C programming and Unix incompatible with x86.
Not with x86, but with x86 segmentation. Note that segments
Rings and segments are pretty much orthogonal concepts.
C is hardly unique in not supporting segmentation.
The only languages I am aware of that even come close are Burroughs
Algol and PL/I (and as always Basic Assembly). (Lisp?)
But overriding is the fact that x86 supporting segments does not
im
Hello everybody,
I wanna request a little change in the installer.
If I install OpenBSD on SMP-Computers I select bsd.mp during the install.
I noticed that bsd.mp will not be renamed to bsd if I don't select any other
Kernels during the setup.
Is it possible to provide a renaming in the installer
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 03:39:01 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's not that bad but so I've to reboot one time more because I've to do a
> 'cd / && mv bsd.rd bsd && reboot'.
Or you could just set the kernel image to bsd.mp.
man boot.conf.
---
Lars Hansson
> > It's not that bad but so I've to reboot one time more because I've to do a
> > 'cd / && mv bsd.rd bsd && reboot'.
>
> Or you could just set the kernel image to bsd.mp.
> man boot.conf.
No. That is not the same. Bad advice.
On Thursday 04 August 2005 08:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> C is hardly unique in not supporting segmentation.
> The only languages I am aware of that even come close are Burroughs
> Algol and PL/I (and as always Basic Assembly). (Lisp?)
Plm86 and Asm86 provided good support for segmentation a
On 8/4/05, Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 03:39:01 +0200 (CEST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > It's not that bad but so I've to reboot one time more because I've to do a
> > 'cd / && mv bsd.rd bsd && reboot'.
>
> Or you could just set the kernel image to bsd.mp.
>
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:06:55 -0600
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Or you could just set the kernel image to bsd.mp.
> > man boot.conf.
>
> No. That is not the same. Bad advice.
My bad then. You learn sometihng new every day.
---
Lars Hansson
On 8/2/05, Michael C. Ibarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just ran into a wall with the scponly option:
>
> "If you do use chroot(), your binary will need to be setuid."
>
> I'll pass on that one for now...
systrace could probably mitigate most of the risk here ... (privsep,
if you're good enoug
I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100 users.
This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos.
Does such configuration can handle the task ? I mean on a performance matter.
Does anybody have such configuration?
Thanks.
I asked to see how the box would behave in terms of performance.
Thanks.
On 8/4/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> if it's in userland you don't need to do anything
> special for it to run on "soekris hardware" i386 is i386 is
> i386. Have you run your stuff on OpenBSD i386?
From: Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Requesting an change in the installer
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:19:41 +0800
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:06:55 -0600
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Or you could just set the kernel image to bsd.mp.
> > man boot.conf.
Hello again everybody,
With the overload-option in PF it's possible to block connections from
hosts wich break my FW-Rules like e.g. too many connection in n Minutes.
'overload' will include the IP into a table and flush every connection
created by this IP.
I would like to know if there's any tim
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100 users.
> This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos.
>
> Does such configuration can handle the task ? I mean on a performance matter.
> Does anybody have such configurati
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked to see how the box would behave in terms of performance.
go grab the oldest PC you can find and you'll probably have roughly
equivalent CPU and RAM performance. I hope you're not considering disk
I/O as part of "performance", because Soe
On 8/5/05, Scott Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100
> > users.
> > This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos.
> >
> > Does such configuration can handle the task ? I
> You're also likely to get more useful responses if you include _any_
> details about what your software does, what it's written in, or even a
> URL to the source (if you really want useful comments).
Here you have it: http://www.cyberspace.org/~grios/project.html
Since, i would really appreciat
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:24:32AM -0400, Steve Williams wrote:
> I upgraded an OpenBSD server from 3.0 to 3.7-current. I am trying to
> switch the pppoe from the user land pppoe to the kernel pppoe. The user
> land one works 100% on 3.7, so I know it's not a physical problem.
> Outgoing conn
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:50:58 -0600, Theo de Raadt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The port is also used to (potentially) send data out to other syslog
>servers. Therefore, it is left open. This is made ASTOUNDINGLY
>clear in the manual page, if you would read it:
>
> syslogd opens the above desc
Anyone running HP thin client with OPENBSD (netbooting from a openbsd server)?
What is your experience with them?
thanks.
Firstly I never said mentioned the word security, so I don't know where
Tobias got that from.
I apologise once again for not searching the archives and reading the
man pages.
May I suggest some tolerance(doesn't have to be sincere) for people who
are simply either too busy or too lazy to rea
> May I suggest some tolerance(doesn't have to be sincere) for people who
> are simply either too busy or too lazy to read man pages in their
> entirety.
Absolutely not. You were lazy and unwilling to educate yourself, and
are making other people watch you sluffing your way through life.
92 matches
Mail list logo
