Hi,
* Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > It lowers my confidence in Vultr as a reliable OpenBSD host.
>
> Very well, it will match the confidence of running OpenBSD on a virtual
> machine.
I have all my public OpenBSD instances running as virtual machines at
IONOS (ionos.com). Their
Sorry to hear about your issues.
Vultr has been top notch in my experience. I have a couple of Vultr hosted
nodes in different data centers that have been running OpenBSD, they’ve been
online for four years now (with downtime for logging into the console to
activate FDE during reboots from
Hi everyone,
Another good alternative is "transip
.eu" They use KVM as a virtualization platform and i think there was no
major issue about OpenBSD since version 6.0. (at least for me).
I also can recommend openbsd.amsterdam :)
My OpenBSD VM at netcup.de (KVM) also runs without any issues for over year
On 4/18/22 00:00, Alexis wrote:
Mihai Popescu writes:
It lowers my confidence in Vultr as a reliable OpenBSD host.
Very well, it will match the confidence of running
Ramnode allows the easy use of OpenBSD on their VMs. You can bring your own ISO
file.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2022, at 3:25 AM, Sean Kamath wrote:
>
> I’ve been running a few Vultr instances since. . . before 2018.
> Periodically, something comes up. I think in the
I’ve been running a few Vultr instances since. . . before 2018. Periodically,
something comes up. I think in the 5-ish years, I’ve had 2 issues. Raise an
issue with their support team and state what happened. Both times, they
responded with some information and that they needed to change
For whatever it is worth, I have been using an OpenBSD VM with Vultr
since 6.7 edition and so far didn't have issues. I may have been a lucky
one that landed on their good side, but I am quite happy with them so
far.
Hakan
On 22/04/17 04:00PM, latin...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
> >
> &
>
> Mihai Popescu writes:
>
>>> It lowers my confidence in Vultr as a reliable OpenBSD host.
>>
>> Very well, it will match the confidence of running OpenBSD on a
>> virtual machine.
>
> Not sure exactly what you mean by that, but i can say i
Mihai Popescu writes:
It lowers my confidence in Vultr as a reliable OpenBSD host.
Very well, it will match the confidence of running OpenBSD on a
virtual machine.
Not sure exactly what you mean by that, but i can say i'm very
happy with my OpenBSD VM provided by openbsd.amst
> It lowers my confidence in Vultr as a reliable OpenBSD host.
Very well, it will match the confidence of running OpenBSD on a virtual machine.
Am 16.04.2022 01:31 schrieb open...@maniaphobic.org:
the representative told me, "OpenBSD has very
special configurations that are required on our end to work properly
with our virtualization software". It lowers my confidence in Vultr as
a reliable OpenBSD host.
Crucial question
Hi all,
I'm posting this for the benefit of OpenBSD community members hosting
virtual machines on Vultr.
I encountered the same failure that Claus A. reported in December:
cd*.iso reboot loop (vultr, Skylake AVX MDS)
https://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg180415.html
Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 06:18:55PM +, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > Just in case someone is wondering: vultr moved the VM to a different
> > server, the system is up and running again.
> > BTW: I guess I can ignore this:
> > fd0 at fd
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 06:18:55PM +, Claus Assmann wrote:
> Just in case someone is wondering: vultr moved the VM to a different
> server, the system is up and running again.
> BTW: I guess I can ignore this:
> fd0 at fdc0 drive 1: density unknown
>
>
> OpenBSD 6.9 (GENE
Philip Guenther wrote:
> They have your virtualization guest configured in a way that doesn't match
> any real hardware: it has a family-model-stepping combination that matches
> the Skylake line, real hardware of which all have the cflushopt extension,
> but the host is making the guest trap whe
Just in case someone is wondering: vultr moved the VM to a different
server, the system is up and running again.
BTW: I guess I can ignore this:
fd0 at fdc0 drive 1: density unknown
OpenBSD 6.9 (GENERIC) #464: Mon Apr 19 10:28:56 MDT 2021
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 4:32 AM Claus Assmann
wrote:
> My vultr OpenBSD 6.8 instance crashed and when it tried to reboot it
> failed at:
>
> root on sd0a (...)
> WARNING: / was not properly unmounted
> kernel: privileged instruction fault trap, code=0
> mds_handler_s
My vultr OpenBSD 6.8 instance crashed and when it tried to reboot it
failed at:
root on sd0a (...)
WARNING: / was not properly unmounted
kernel: privileged instruction fault trap, code=0
mds_handler_skl_avx+0x33: clflush __ALIGN_SIZE+0x500(%rid,%rax,8)
I tried to boot from cd{68,69,70}iso but
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 09:47:52PM +, Étienne wrote:
> On 06/01/2019 16:38, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> >
> > Use their default OpenBSD install. They have a special config on the
> > host for OpenBSD and the clock drifting problem.
> >
> Can you tell us more? Do you mean they chan
On 06/01/2019 16:38, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
Use their default OpenBSD install. They have a special config on the
host for OpenBSD and the clock drifting problem.
Can you tell us more? Do you mean they change a setting on the host
machine just for the OpenBSD guest, that they wou
> > boot off that, reinstall exactly as you want it. The Vultr console
> > works great on OpenBSD chrome and firefox browsers. Use DHCP for
> > network. Done.
>
> This is exactly what I have done, and it works very well. I just wanted
> to add that I included "inet6 aut
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 08:44:03AM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> Use their install ONLY to put your own bsd.rd in root (everyone seems to
> obsess over loading an ISO. Who cares? Just use a -current bsd.rd!),
> boot off that, reinstall exactly as you want it. The Vultr console
> wo
On 1/5/19 5:22 PM, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> I was thinking about spinning up a new instance on vultr to play with.
> They have an option to install OBSD 6.3/4. Has anyone tried these? I
> attempted the FBSD one in the past, but the default install was all
> whacked out and I
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 05:43:36PM -0600, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 02:40:43PM -0800, Misc User wrote:
> > On 1/5/2019 2:22 PM, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> > > I was thinking about spinning up a new instance on vultr to play with.
> >
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 02:40:43PM -0800, Misc User wrote:
> On 1/5/2019 2:22 PM, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> > I was thinking about spinning up a new instance on vultr to play with.
> > They have an option to install OBSD 6.3/4. Has anyone tried these? I
> > attempte
Hi,
I have two systems with Vultr (Sydney and Tokyo) and find them to be fine. True
the default install using the automated Vultr 6.3/6.4 install will create two
partitions and swap. I have installed one of my OpenBSD system using a custom
install ISO OpenBSD 6.4 and with that I can do it
On January 5, 2019 4:22:23 PM CST, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
>I was thinking about spinning up a new instance on vultr to play with.
>They have an option to install OBSD 6.3/4. Has anyone tried these? I
>attempted the FBSD one in the past, but the default install was all
>whack
On 1/5/2019 2:22 PM, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
I was thinking about spinning up a new instance on vultr to play with.
They have an option to install OBSD 6.3/4. Has anyone tried these? I
attempted the FBSD one in the past, but the default install was all
whacked out and I had to start over
I was thinking about spinning up a new instance on vultr to play with.
They have an option to install OBSD 6.3/4. Has anyone tried these? I
attempted the FBSD one in the past, but the default install was all
whacked out and I had to start over with a fresh install.
Thanks,
Edgar
> Without digging them up I did a quick google on openbsd issues vultr.
> It pulled some things I saw before with 6.2 and timing, as well as
> issues with the base image, and other ones talking about a setting in
> KVM that was causing issues on certain servers.
I use Vultr, happily,
> On 8. Sep 2018, at 19:55, Ken M wrote:
...
> 1. Is it still current information that it would be better to use my own
> image/install/iso for openbsd on Vultr?
>
I’ve run general purpose OpenBSD boxes on Vultr for several years, mostly for
development while travelling and wi
My personal experience with vultr is good. At the moment I'm using my
own 6.2 iso. Everything runs smoothly.
Regarding network performance I noticed no problems till today but it is
just a small mail server.
On 9 September 2018 10:05:16 BST, Étienne
>
> On 8 September 2018 19:55:16
> Wiadomość napisana przez Ken M w dniu 08.09.2018, o godz.
> 20:55:
>
> 2. Is vultr a good place to host an openbsd box? If not interested in hearing
> alternatives.
my own experience:
1) Vultr gave me very bad support experience. If you restore from snapshot you
have
On 8 September 2018 19:55:16 BST, Ken M
> My questions are:
>
>1. Is it still current information that it would be better to use my
>own
>image/install/iso for openbsd on Vultr?
I just like to manage the disk my own way, so I don't use their install
process. But they p
I think vultr is setting a great example that many hosting providers should
follow, I mean I bet 65% run kvm and then it is possible to run openbsd , but I
think many providers doesn't put in the energy to do it / configure a template
for it
On September 9, 2018 12:26:29 AM UTC, Ken M
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 08:36:01PM +0100, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
> On 08/09/2018 19:55, Ken M wrote:
> What kind of issues? I'm curious. Can you pls provide a reference?
>
Without digging them up I did a quick google on openbsd issues vultr. It pulled
some things I saw befor
On Sep 8, 2018 4:35 PM, flipchan wrote:
>
> U have to tell em to open port 25
>
> On September 8, 2018 6:55:16 PM UTC, Ken M wrote:
> >This is related to my mail server thread, but in googling about openbsd
> >on vultr
> >I have seen some comments here and there
U have to tell em to open port 25
On September 8, 2018 6:55:16 PM UTC, Ken M wrote:
>This is related to my mail server thread, but in googling about openbsd
>on vultr
>I have seen some comments here and there about issues with the default
>image on
>vultr and to use a custom image
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 06:55:16PM +, Ken M wrote:
> 2. Is vultr a good place to host an openbsd box? If not interested in hearing
> alternatives.
>
I have been using baremetal servers. They are cheap (please don't go too
cheap!)
You do need to make sure that they will allo
On 08/09/2018 19:55, Ken M wrote:
I have seen some comments here and there about issues with the default image
What kind of issues? I'm curious. Can you pls provide a reference?
I have an instance on ramnode. No problems since 6.0
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 at 20:18, Tony Boston wrote:
> On 08.09.18 02:55, Ken M wrote:
> > This is related to my mail server thread, but in googling about openbsd
> on vultr
> > I have seen some comments here and there abo
; On Sep 8, 2018 at 12:55,wrote:
>>
>>
>> This is related to my mail server thread, but in googling about openbsd on
>> vultr I have seen some comments here and there about issues with the default
>> image on vultr and to use a custom image or iso instead of what
I'm very happy with https://openbsd.amsterdam/.
Plus, they donate back.
Tracey
>
> On Sep 8, 2018 at 12:55,wrote:
>
>
> This is related to my mail server thread, but in googling about openbsd on
> vultr I have seen some comments here
On 08.09.18 02:55, Ken M wrote:
> This is related to my mail server thread, but in googling about openbsd on
> vultr
> I have seen some comments here and there about issues with the default image
> on
> vultr and to use a custom image or iso instead of what they have. Some of
This is related to my mail server thread, but in googling about openbsd on vultr
I have seen some comments here and there about issues with the default image on
vultr and to use a custom image or iso instead of what they have. Some of these
seem dated and related to older versions of openbsd. My
Absolutely. Have been using OpenBSD as a custom ISO with Vultr for quite
some time now. I'm just pleased by the fact that it's now "officially
supported" as this, for better or worse, will bring in more users to
OpenBSD.
Hopefully this will be a big smack in the face to
About time -- thanks for being the bearer of good news.
-- Murk
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Troy Frericks
wrote:
> Vultr now has direct support for #*OpenBSD*
> <https://twitter.com/hashtag/OpenBSD?src=hash>. Launch your OpenBSD
> environment easily from our deplo
Vultr now has direct support for #*OpenBSD*
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/OpenBSD?src=hash>. Launch your OpenBSD
environment easily from our deploy panel at http://Vultr.com
<https://t.co/d8xVU3LP1Z> ! #*Cloud*
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cloud?src=hash>
https://twitter.com/Vultr
48 matches
Mail list logo
