I think vultr is setting a great example that many hosting providers should follow, I mean I bet 65% run kvm and then it is possible to run openbsd , but I think many providers doesn't put in the energy to do it / configure a template for it
On September 9, 2018 12:26:29 AM UTC, Ken M <k...@mack-z.com> wrote: >On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 08:36:01PM +0100, Chris Narkiewicz wrote: >> On 08/09/2018 19:55, Ken M wrote: >> What kind of issues? I'm curious. Can you pls provide a reference? >> > >Without digging them up I did a quick google on openbsd issues vultr. >It pulled >some things I saw before with 6.2 and timing, as well as issues with >the base >image, and other ones talking about a setting in KVM that was causing >issues on >certain servers. > >I can link them if you wish. I wanted to ask here because they seemed >out of >date, and when it comes to openbsd I have to filter what a google >search pulls >as I find so much misinformation about openbsd out there. Some of it >more for >being out of date, some of it just plain anti without knowing, some >just >misinformation. > >So in short I figured asking here would be more current and accurate. >This is a >case where I consider the absence of such information a result. >Although I think >I might consider openbsd amsterdam that was mentioned. My only >hesitation is >vmm/vmd considered mature enough for a production hosting solution? > >Ken -- Take Care Sincerely flipchan layerprox dev
