ntel(R) Atom(TM) CPU S1260 @ 2.00GHz, 1995.07 MHz, 06-36-09, patch
> > 010d
> > cpu0: cpuid 1
> > edx=bfebfbff
> > ecx=40e3bd
> > cpu0: cpuid 6 eax=5 ecx=1
> > cpu0: cpuid a vers=3, gp=2, gpwidth=40, ff=3, ffwidth=40
> > cpu0: cpuid 8001 edx=20100800 e
01 edx=20100800 ecx=1
> cpu0: cpuid 8007 edx=100
> cpu0: MELTDOWN
> cpu0: 24KB 64b/line 6-way D-cache, 32KB 64b/line 8-way I-cache, 512KB
> 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
> cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0
> mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 7 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges
> cpu0: a
, ffwidth=40
cpu0: cpuid 8001 edx=20100800 ecx=1
cpu0: cpuid 8007 edx=100
cpu0: MELTDOWN
cpu0: 24KB 64b/line 6-way D-cache, 32KB 64b/line 8-way I-cache, 512KB 64b/line
8-way L2 cache
cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 7 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges
cpu0:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 08:52:41PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 5:20 PM H. Hartzer wrote:
> > When I boot this system, dmesg does not mention EPT support. vmm fails
> > to start as well.
> >
> > However, in the BIOS virtualization suppor
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 5:20 PM H. Hartzer wrote:
> When I boot this system, dmesg does not mention EPT support. vmm fails
> to start as well.
>
> However, in the BIOS virtualization support is enabled. I see nothing
> about EPT.
>
> The specification sheet from Intel[1] say
Hi misc@,
When I boot this system, dmesg does not mention EPT support. vmm fails
to start as well.
However, in the BIOS virtualization support is enabled. I see nothing
about EPT.
The specification sheet from Intel[1] says that this processor supports
Extended Page Tables.
Is the specification
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 5:31 PM Ethan Azariah wrote:
> thanks. i might have misunderstood inodes role in hard linking.
> when you make a hard link, does it use a new inode?
man ln
then, from within less(1) opened by that command:
/inode
You're not the only one misunderstanding, if there is a hard link and
you modify the files without removing them first from the original
directory then the backup gets modified too. Be careful adding that
"-l" (ell)
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 5:31 PM Ethan Azariah wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, at
of "profiles".
>
> Stuart replied a few months back on that thread talking about a "slight
> issue", but it seems to me that acme-client(1) will eventually have this
> ability. I presume this includes support for IP addresses, but I
> obviously can't speak on behalf o
;.
>
> Stuart replied a few months back on that thread talking about a "slight
> issue", but it seems to me that acme-client(1) will eventually have this
> ability. I presume this includes support for IP addresses, but I
> obviously can't speak on behalf of Stuart and c
hat thread talking about a "slight
issue", but it seems to me that acme-client(1) will eventually have this
ability. I presume this includes support for IP addresses, but I
obviously can't speak on behalf of Stuart and company.
[^1]: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=173659382332551&w=2
Let's Encrypt is rolling out the capability soon to issue certificates with
SAN of type iPAddress. More info here:
https://letsencrypt.org/2025/01/16/6-day-and-ip-certs/
https://letsencrypt.org/2025/01/09/acme-profiles/
Whether this is wonderful or a terrible, bonkers idea is irrelevant here. I'm
On 2025-06-27 07:33, Ethan Azariah wrote:
do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
I just use dump and restore which is part of the base install.
I like how it can capture incremental change and
On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 04:39:28PM -0400, Geoff Steckel wrote:
> FWIW, nlink_t is uint32_t which gives you quite a bit of time
> before it runs out.
LINK_MAX is 32767 which gives you somewhat less ;-).
might eventually hit that limit and stop
working, (unless you take steps to prevent that).
thanks. accounting for that limit would complexify my plans
excessively. i'd better use another strategy with a different
filesystem.
i'm thinking i'll use zfs in omnios if my hard
ally hit that limit and stop
> working, (unless you take steps to prevent that).
thanks. accounting for that limit would complexify my plans
excessively. i'd better use another strategy with a different
filesystem.
i'm thinking i'll use zfs in omnios if my hardware will support i
On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 12:05 AM CEST, Scott Walters wrote:
> Very semi-informed take here. Obvoiusly the people actually working
> on this stuff know first hand and I'm maybe not even third hand...
> but afaik this is a gap in OpenBSD that work is being done on.
> OpenBSD will mount Linux ext 2 fi
On Saturday, June 28, 2025 8:50:09 AM CDT j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
> >> No, but your backup system should give you the ability to recover
> >> historic versions of files. Maybe not with the granularity you would
> >> like.
> >
> > that's true. daily would be granular enough, though more often wou
Hello,
Sorry for my ignorance. I did not think it out. I figured using another
internal tool would be cool. I enjoy this list and learn a lot on here, like
today. Thanks for all the hard work. @tech is cool too. I don't know much C but
it's neat to look at the patches. I remember git has lfs to
Hi,
Ethan Azariah wrote on Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 04:26:05PM +0100:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, at 4:03 PM, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 03:53:37PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
>>> can ffs run out of inodes as ext2 can?
>> Yes.
Specifically, https://man.openbsd.org/newfs.8#i .
>>
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 04:26:05PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, at 4:03 PM, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 03:53:37PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> >> can ffs run out of inodes as ext2 can?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > But with default settings and typical use, it
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, at 4:03 PM, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 03:53:37PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
>> can ffs run out of inodes as ext2 can?
>
> Yes.
>
> But with default settings and typical use, it probably won't happen.
thanks. i might have misunderstood inodes role in har
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 03:53:37PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> can ffs run out of inodes as ext2 can?
Yes.
But with default settings and typical use, it probably won't happen.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, at 2:50 PM, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> No, but your backup system should give you the ability to recover
>>> historic versions of files. Maybe not with the granularity you would
>>> like.
>>
>> that's true. daily would be granular enough, though more often would
>> be
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, at 10:38 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:41:05PM -0400, Reese Johnson wrote:
>> Backup into got. :)
>
> I realize you might be joking, but to anyone taking this seriously,
> don't do this!
> The most well-known caveat is that this is not a suitable solu
No, but your backup system should give you the ability to recover
historic versions of files. Maybe not with the granularity you would
like.
that's true. daily would be granular enough, though more often would
be nice.
If you want daily history, irrespective of how many changes were
made
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:41:05PM -0400, Reese Johnson wrote:
> Backup into got. :)
I realize you might be joking, but to anyone taking this seriously, don't do
this!
The most well-known caveat is that this is not a suitable solution for large
files.
But in any case you will eventually hit the
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, at 2:38 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 6/26/25 17:33, Ethan Azariah wrote:
>> do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
>> through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
>>
>
> No, but your backup
s.
https://orib.dev/gefs.html
looking at it has been useful, thanks. https://orib.dev/gefs.pdf
reminds/informs me of whats wrong with the other plan 9 filesystems,
and has given me an idea for my backup system.
> All plan 9 file servers support at least daily dump, fossil also
> support
Vào Th 6, 27 thg 6, 2025 vào lúc 08:25 Ethan Azariah
đã viết:
>
> do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
> through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
>
Ori Bernstein is going on his file system gefs, and he want to port i
Backup into got. :)
Reese
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 09:38:47AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 6/26/25 17:33, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> > do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
> > through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
&g
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, at 1:51 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> drive, but you would get at least some advantage from having ZFS serve up
> >> the
> >> storage. I didn't do any testing though, so I still don't know how well it
> >> would work. Maybe someone else has tried it.
> >
> > That's not
On Friday, June 27, 2025 7:51:04 AM CDT Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2025-06-26, Robert B. Carleton wrote:
> > I haven't tried it, but I contemplated trying the OpenBSD iSCSI initiator
> > iscsid(8) and using FreeBSD to provide a ZFS zvol block device as a
> > target.
> >
> > You'd still have to
On 6/26/25 17:33, Ethan Azariah wrote:
do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
No, but your backup system should give you the ability to recover
historic versions of files. Maybe not with the
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, at 1:51 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2025-06-26, Robert B. Carleton wrote:
>> I haven't tried it, but I contemplated trying the OpenBSD iSCSI initiator
>> iscsid(8) and using FreeBSD to provide a ZFS zvol block device as a target.
>>
>> You'd still have to fsck OpenBSD
On 2025-06-26, Robert B. Carleton wrote:
> I haven't tried it, but I contemplated trying the OpenBSD iSCSI initiator
> iscsid(8) and using FreeBSD to provide a ZFS zvol block device as a target.
>
> You'd still have to fsck OpenBSD filesystems on partitions from the iSCSI
> drive, but you woul
On 2025-06-26, Scott Walters wrote:
> Very semi-informed take here. Obvoiusly the people actually working
> on this stuff know first hand and I'm maybe not even third hand...
> but afaik this is a gap in OpenBSD that work is being done on.
I'm not aware of any work being done on this sort of thi
Den fre 27 juni 2025 kl 10:28 skrev Ethan Azariah :
> > Why reinvent the wheel?
> > Just go TrueNAS.
> > That's all you need, besides a HBA.
>
> What's a HBA and how much will it cost me? ;-)
In the old days, this meant "a scsi card", so just a disk controller
of any sort suitable for the drive to
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 08:24:10AM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> What's a HBA
Host Bus Adaptor
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, at 5:14 AM, Lloyd wrote:
> If you're looking for a fileserver, take a serious look at OmniOS,
> which is under-appreciated.
>
> Solaris ZFS, in-kernel SMB server (and NFS of course), and natively
> supports NT-style ACLs as opposed to the Samba UID/GID mapping kludge.
Inter
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, at 7:34 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> Why reinvent the wheel?
> Just go TrueNAS.
> That's all you need, besides a HBA.
What's a HBA and how much will it cost me? ;-)
Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> >> > do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
> >> > through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
> >>
> >> No, FFS has no such capability. A
If you're looking for a fileserver, take a serious look at OmniOS, which is
under-appreciated.
Solaris ZFS, in-kernel SMB server (and NFS of course), and natively supports
NT-style ACLs as opposed to the Samba UID/GID mapping kludge.
Ethan Azariah wrote:
> i want a network fileserver so ther
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025, at 11:59 PM, Robert B. Carleton wrote:
> On Thursday, June 26, 2025 5:36:31 PM CDT Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
>> > do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
>> &
On Thursday, June 26, 2025 5:36:31 PM CDT Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> > do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
> > through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
> through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
No, FFS has no such capability. AFAIK there is no ongoing effort to
bring a alternat
if that's
a requirement, FreeBSD is probably your best bet for now.
Good luck!
-s
On 0, Ethan Azariah wrote:
> do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
> through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
do any openbsd filesystems support any sort of file history, whether
through snapshots or as a log structured filesystem or any other way?
I think this is the same as unsetting / not exporting
SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING in the soiffice script. With locking working
properly now, there is no need for it anymaore. Thanks.
Op 06-06-2025 om 19:58 schreef Paul Wisehart:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 02:33:13PM +0200, Frans Schneider wrote:
New
I
receive the message mount.nfs4: Protocol not supported. It seems that
the OpenBSD file server does not support NFS v4.
From the documentation on OpenBSD, I had more or less gathered that
OpenBSD does support NFS version 4.
My questions are:
Does OpenBSD support NFS v4? If so, how do
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 02:33:13PM +0200, Frans Schneider wrote:
> Newbie here! I recently started using OpenBSD, primarily as a central
> file server. So far, I am very pleased with it!
>
> The problem I am encountering is that when I mount files on a Linux
> system via NFS and then open them wit
tocol not supported. It seems that
> the OpenBSD file server does not support NFS v4.
>
> From the documentation on OpenBSD, I had more or less gathered that
> OpenBSD does support NFS version 4.
>
> My questions are:
>
> Does OpenBSD support NFS v4? If so, how do I inst
use NFS v4 for better handling of locks. However, when I
now mount with mount -onodev,nosuid -tnfs4 tp2:/home/fs /home/fs/nfs, I
receive the message mount.nfs4: Protocol not supported. It seems that
the OpenBSD file server does not support NFS v4.
From the documentation on OpenBSD, I had more or less
Hello,
Valmis Di Carlo Hidalgo wrote on Mon, May 12, 2025 at 12:27:14PM -0400:
> 0
> C Dominican Republic
> P DN
> T Santo Domingo
> Z 10201
> O DICATECH
> I Valmis Di Carlo Hidalgo
> A Av. Sarasota, #36, Plaza Kury
> M mailto:val...@dicatech.net
> U https://www.dicatech.net/openbsd.html
> B +180
0
C Dominican Republic
P DN
T Santo Domingo
Z 10201
O DICATECH
I Valmis Di Carlo Hidalgo
A Av. Sarasota, #36, Plaza Kury
M mailto:val...@dicatech.net
U https://www.dicatech.net/openbsd.html
B +1809-480-8224
N OpenBSD: Consulting, Training, Cloud Solutions, Firewalls, Servers, and more
0
C Dominican Republic
P DN
T Santo Domingo
Z 10201
O DICATECH
I Valmis Di Carlo Hidalgo
A Av. Sarasota, #36, Plaza Kury
M mailto:val...@dicatech.net
U https://www.dicatech.net/openbsd.html
B +1809-480-8224
N OpenBSD: Consulting, Training, Cloud Solutions, Firewalls, Servers, and more
I have interest and I would start with the Linux brand already running
on it, OpenBSD later. From Brazil here.
On 3/10/25 08:28, S V wrote:
Hello, list
I was playing a little with Loongson3A6000 mobo and decided to order
it for myself.
So before it arrives I decided to heat some interest in l
Hello, list
I was playing a little with Loongson3A6000 mobo and decided to order
it for myself.
So before it arrives I decided to heat some interest in list (and lazy
call to some help)
It is pretty straightforward "desktop" board from ASUS with UEFI
(EDK2), BOOTLOONGARCH64.EFI and MIPS64 compat
0
C Austria
P Styria
T Graz
Z 8010
O N01ytics e.U.
I Raymundo Soto Morales
A Obere Teichstrasse 37
M i...@n01ytics.eu
U https://n01ytics.eu/en-faq.html
B +4367761636199
X None
N More than 7 years of experience in BSD. OpenBSD installation and
administration: firewalls for small networks, netboot/DN
Hello misc,
I’m slowly adding IPV6 support to my (e-mail) setup. For anti-spam
mechanism I want to use spamd(8) because it has served me well so far,
but it only supports IPV4. Are there any plans to also add the same
functionalities for IPV6?
The only discussion regarding this topic I could
Franco Sponga [franco.spo...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a PC Engines APU2E4 with 4GB ECC RAM. I have upgraded the BIOS, and
> ECC support should be enabled.
>
> Is there a way to verify that ECC support is enabled in OpenBSD?
> Additionally, in the case of me
Hello,
I have a PC Engines APU2E4 with 4GB ECC RAM. I have upgraded the BIOS, and ECC
support should be enabled.
Is there a way to verify that ECC support is enabled in OpenBSD? Additionally,
in the case of memory errors, should I expect to see any logged messages in
/var/log/messages?
Thank
, maintenance, and support for small and mid-size
businesses, backed by over 25 years of experience with BSD-based
systems. We deliver tailored solutions, including secure setups for
clustered firewalls, routers, servers, and VPN nodes, along with
ongoing maintenance and troubleshooting to ensure
On 2024-10-24, Y C wrote:
> --699c670625358ae8
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi Everyone
>
> I made modifications to the OpenBSD bridge code (/sys/net/if_bridge.c) to
> allow the forwarding of 802.1X EAPOL packets between interfaces of the
> bridge.
>
> I changed the
Hi Everyone
I made modifications to the OpenBSD bridge code (/sys/net/if_bridge.c) to
allow the forwarding of 802.1X EAPOL packets between interfaces of the
bridge.
I changed the following:
@@ -1221,6 +1221,10 @@ bridge_process(struct ifnet *ifp, struct
m);
if (m == NULL)
goto ba
vidual components be
> supported it the hardware around them cannot
> be booted?
Is it really that hard to imagine?
Either it's also used on another platform, and/or someone is working on
Pi 5 support.
On 2024-10-10, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 5:26 PM hahahahacker2009
> wrote:
>> Yeah, and that's driver for some components. It does not mean
>> the board is supported.
Right. Don't assume that "b has been done" means that "a has been done"
even if you think that one implies the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 5:26 PM hahahahacker2009
wrote:
> Yeah, and that's driver for some components. It does not mean
> the board is supported.
Which begs the questions:
1) How can those individual components be
supported it the hardware around them cannot
be booted?
2) Why put it in the rele
en booting from install76.img, the pi5 claims:
>
> > The installed operating system (OS) does not indicate support for
> > Raspberry Pi 5. Update the OS or set os_check=0 in config.txt to skip
> > this check.
>
> After editing config.txt from the boot partition and adding th
the
arm64 installation guide.
When booting from install76.img, the pi5 claims:
> The installed operating system (OS) does not indicate support for
> Raspberry Pi 5. Update the OS or set os_check=0 in config.txt to skip
> this check.
After editing config.txt from the boot partition and adding
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 05:07:29PM -0400, J Doe wrote:
> Related to this .. I noticed the following at the bottom of man:
>
> "The firmware is outdated and contains known vulnerabilities."
The originally imported firmware images were known vulnerable to
CVE-2017-9417 ("broadpwn"), which this
On 2024-09-20 14:42, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 06:18:25PM -0400, J Doe wrote:
Hi list,
I see in the FAQ that the Apple Mac Mini M2 is a supported platform[0]
and that the WiFi is supported via: bwfmv(4). I had two questions about
WiFi support:
1. Is Host AP mode
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 06:18:25PM -0400, J Doe wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I see in the FAQ that the Apple Mac Mini M2 is a supported platform[0]
> and that the WiFi is supported via: bwfmv(4). I had two questions about
> WiFi support:
>
> 1. Is Host AP mode supported on the
On 2024-09-19, J Doe wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I see in the FAQ that the Apple Mac Mini M2 is a supported platform[0]
> and that the WiFi is supported via: bwfmv(4). I had two questions about
> WiFi support:
>
> 1. Is Host AP mode supported on the Mac Mini M2? The man pages a
> On Sep 20, 2024, at 02:19, J Doe wrote:
>
>
>>> On Sep 19, 2024, at 18:46, J Doe wrote:
>>>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I see in the FAQ that the Apple Mac Mini M2 is a supported platform[0]
>> and that the WiFi is supported via: bwfmv(4). I ha
> On Sep 19, 2024, at 18:46, J Doe wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I see in the FAQ that the Apple Mac Mini M2 is a supported platform[0]
> and that the WiFi is supported via: bwfmv(4). I had two questions about
> WiFi support:
>
> 1. Is Host AP mode supported on the
Hi list,
I see in the FAQ that the Apple Mac Mini M2 is a supported platform[0]
and that the WiFi is supported via: bwfmv(4). I had two questions about
WiFi support:
1. Is Host AP mode supported on the Mac Mini M2? The man pages appear
to imply that this is supported, but I wanted to double
git README
> [https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/tree/README] and comiled cgit with lua
> support using:
>
> `gmake LUA_PKGCONFIG=luajit CFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include/luajit-2.0" install`
>
> However, when I try to run the `cgit.cgi` with the following OpenBSD
> `httpd` con
Hello there,
I've been trying to setup cgit on my OpenBSD server and encountered an
issue with running my own compiled version of `cgit.cgi`. Here's some
context:
I followed the official instructions from the cgit README
[https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/tree/README] and comiled cgit with l
mission port.
>
> So, simple use submission port and that's it.
>
> P.S. I think that m...@opensmtpd.org is the right misc@ for this email.
>
Thinking out loud now. If OpenSMTPD does something based on the port
configured, I would rate that utterly workaround. I am thinking abou
On Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:12:19 +0200,
Christian Schulte wrote:
>
> I just started to read OpenSMTPD sources. Regarding the latest
> discussions on tech@, there maybe seems to be the need to instruct
> OpenSMTPD listeners to behave differently when acting as MTA or MSA.
> Reading man smtpd.conf(5)[1
Hi misc@,
I just started to read OpenSMTPD sources. Regarding the latest
discussions on tech@, there maybe seems to be the need to instruct
OpenSMTPD listeners to behave differently when acting as MTA or MSA.
Reading man smtpd.conf(5)[1] there is an option to add a tag to the
"listen on [socket]"
On 2024-08-06, Y C wrote:
> I=E2=80=99m seeking assistance with 802.1x security support using OpenBSD 7=
> .3 as a
> firewall/router.
>
> Here=E2=80=99s a depiction of my setup: I am attempting to use 802.1x secur=
> ity on a
> client VM.
>
> **RADIUS Server VM (Ub
Hi Everyone,
I’m seeking assistance with 802.1x security support using OpenBSD 7.3 as a
firewall/router.
Here’s a depiction of my setup: I am attempting to use 802.1x security on a
client VM.
**RADIUS Server VM (Ubuntu OS)** -- connected **Authenticator
VM (Ubuntu OS
equest 157 (
https://github.com/intel/x86-simd-sort/pull/157) adds conditional
compilation flags for our type sizes as well as being behind on Clang major
versions.
If anyone else is working on numpy 2.0 support or has already gone down
this path, I would be happy to coordinate to fix all th
0
C Germany
P Berlin
T Berlin
Z 10999
O Blunix GmbH
I
A Glogauer Straße 21
M i...@blunix.com
U https://www.blunix.com/
B +49 30 / 629 318 76
X
N Automated, security-focused, and FOSS customized hosting solutions for
OpenBSD and Debian Linux. 24/7/365 emergency support with a maximum 60-minute
0
C United States
P New York
T Lansing
Z 14882
O Ready-to-Run Software, Inc.
I Jeff Moskow
A 212 Cedar Cove
M open...@rtr.com
U http://www.rtr.com/Ready-to-Run_Software/OpenBSD/
B 607-533-8649
X 607-533-UNIX
N We have been installing, supporting and managing OpenBSD systems for
over 20 years. De
On Friday, April 5th, 2024 at 8:32 PM, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Pure sending will saturate your interface 1/10 Gbit/s. So, it depends
> on your traffic source. The receiving speed of the opposite interface
> will be the bottleneck of the em(4)/bnxt(4) sending interface. Also
> the speed of your disk,
Hi Mabi,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:24:27PM +, mabi wrote:
> First thank you for another great OpenBSD release. I just updated my
> home firewall today and was wondering about the performance of TSO
> support on bnxt and em interfaces which have been added to the 7.5
> release.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:24:27PM +, mabi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First thank you for another great OpenBSD release. I just updated my home
> firewall today and was wondering about the performance of TSO support on bnxt
> and em interfaces which have been added to the 7.5 relea
Hi,
First thank you for another great OpenBSD release. I just updated my home
firewall today and was wondering about the performance of TSO support on bnxt
and em interfaces which have been added to the 7.5 release...
Does anyone know roughly the performance gains by having TSO support on
, PostgreSQL DBMS, FastCGI protocol and C
programming language.
Regards
Kihaguru.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Kihaguru Gathura
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024, 21:43
Subject: Re: Support Update
To: Ingo Schwarze
Cc: ,
Hi Ingo,
Thank you for your understanding.
The domain situation is
Thnx again for the more replies..
Страхиња Радић wrote:
> On 24/03/08 11:37PM, Dan wrote:
> > * depending on one general font for text, often a
> > monospaced one, they will have no luck to display emoji anyway.
>
> No, this depends on fontconfig[1] configuration.
>
> [1]:
> https://fontconf
On 24/03/08 11:37PM, Dan wrote:
> * depending on one general font for text, often a
> monospaced one, they will have no luck to display emoji anyway.
No, this depends on fontconfig[1] configuration.
[1]: https://fontconfig.pages.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.html
Dan writes:
Just adding a little feedback more about dealing with emoji
flags
coding on my station:
Claws Mail*: doesn't help a lot, blank with auto encoding or a
difficult hex representation with unicode; anyway it depends on
a
general font set in its preferences.
gedit*: depend on the ge
hex representation of the emoji.
* depending on one general font for text, often a
monospaced one, they will have no luck to display emoji anyway.
-Dan
Dan wrote:
>
> Tested in 7.4 Xfce, Firefox and Badwolf titlebar don't support
> emojicon (tested: flags) like from the picture attached.
On 24/03/08 09:40PM, Dan wrote:
> Tested in 7.4 Xfce, Firefox and Badwolf titlebar don't support emojicon
> (tested: flags) like from the picture attached.
While OpenBSD doesn't support color emoji[1] like Noto Color Emoji, you can use
the font Symbola from the package
On 2024-03-08, Dan wrote:
> Tested in 7.4 Xfce, Firefox and Badwolf titlebar don't support emojicon
> (tested: flags) like from the picture attached.
> --MP_/lkiChjrXvBrR91ZQdbF+m=B
> Content-Type: image/png
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Dispositio
Hello,
Tested in 7.4 Xfce, Firefox and Badwolf titlebar don't support emojicon
(tested: flags) like from the picture attached.
Thxs!
-Dan
0
C Egypt
P Cairo
T
Z
O Sysadmin Consulting
I mahmoudElshimi
A Cairo, Egypt
M mahmoudelsh...@protonmail.ch
U
B
X
N OpenBSD, Linux, and Networks consulting, installation, maintenance, and
support services.
1 - 100 of 1087 matches
Mail list logo
