window managers are in base installation.
> So, I just was interested why dwm isnt. However, I understand
> that most people edit the config.h and compile dwm on there own
> and so do I. But it would be convenient to use dwm to compile my own
> dwm.
>
> Well, I can fork Ope
ig.h and compile dwm on there own
and so do I. But it would be convenient to use dwm to compile my own
dwm.
Well, I can fork OpenBSD and make things properly :D.
Jokes beside: dwm in base doesnt make much sense.
Cheers
--
z...@sdf.org
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:52:14PM +, z...@sdf.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there are a lot of nice window managers in OpenBSD base (fvwm, cwm, ...).
>
> I am a big fan of dwm and I think it shares the philosophy of minimalism
> which is important to a lot of BSD lovers. Also, it has a good cod
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:26:28PM -0400, Sean Howard wrote:
> Almost everyone compiles dwm on their own, binaries are almost useless. At
> least amongst the users I've known.
> > On Tue Jul 10 2012 20:52, z...@sdf.org wrote:
> > And, last but not least, its configuration is modified by editing it
Almost everyone compiles dwm on their own, binaries are almost useless. At
least amongst the users I've known.
On 2012-07-10 5:44 PM, "Norman Golisz" wrote:
> On Tue Jul 10 2012 20:52, z...@sdf.org wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > there are a lot of nice window managers in OpenBSD base (fvwm, cwm, ...).
On Tue Jul 10 2012 20:52, z...@sdf.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there are a lot of nice window managers in OpenBSD base (fvwm, cwm, ...).
>
> I am a big fan of dwm and I think it shares the philosophy of minimalism
> which is important to a lot of BSD lovers. Also, it has a good code
> quality and
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, wrote:
> Is there a reason why dwm isnt in OpenBSD base installation?
Maintaining software in base is more effort than maintaining it in the
ports tree, so there needs to be a good reason to go through that
extra effort. What's wrong with just installing it via
Hello,
there are a lot of nice window managers in OpenBSD base (fvwm, cwm, ...).
I am a big fan of dwm and I think it shares the philosophy of minimalism
which is important to a lot of BSD lovers. Also, it has a good code
quality and is rock solid...
Is there a reason why dwm isnt in OpenBSD
8 matches
Mail list logo