Almost everyone compiles dwm on their own, binaries are almost useless. At least amongst the users I've known. On 2012-07-10 5:44 PM, "Norman Golisz" <li...@zcat.de> wrote:
> On Tue Jul 10 2012 20:52, z...@sdf.org wrote: > > Hello, > > > > there are a lot of nice window managers in OpenBSD base (fvwm, cwm, ...). > > > > I am a big fan of dwm and I think it shares the philosophy of minimalism > > which is important to a lot of BSD lovers. Also, it has a good code > > quality and is rock solid... > > > > Is there a reason why dwm isnt in OpenBSD base installation? > > Is there a reason why dwm should be included into base? > dwm is extremely small, easy to compile and install (it doesn't even > need gnu make crap, everything necessary to build comes with base). And, > last but not least, its configuration is modified by editing its > config.h by hand. So, everyone seriously using it compiles it from > source, anyway.
