Antoine, I actually did use that repo for building and running openbsd on AWS.
Unfortunately, I don't have access to physical openbsd machine to create vmdk
now.
So, I had to resort to running qemu and installing openbsd there, followed by
the
steps I outlined below.
There was a community AMI
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:01:06PM +, All wrote:
> OK, thanks to Mike and Antoine!
> I tried with t2 instances (current generation - the only choice present), yet
> still no dice. Perhaps, the issue is with how I created the image.
> I used qemu, created qcow2, installed openbsd, converted qcow
SD on AWS.
> Antoine Jacoutot did a great work to make that possible.
> These days, xnf0 interface is not being initialized. Xen is being
> identified as Xen 4.11 (12?) but no xnf interfaces are sowing up
> after boot. NetBSD has xennet0 being initiated and FreeBSD (I guess) xnb.
>
> Di
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:40:34PM +, All wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There was a time when we could run OpenBSD on AWS.
> Antoine Jacoutot did a great work to make that possible.
> These days, xnf0 interface is not being initialized. Xen is being
> identified as Xen 4.11 (12?) but no
Hi,
There was a time when we could run OpenBSD on AWS.
Antoine Jacoutot did a great work to make that possible.
These days, xnf0 interface is not being initialized. Xen is being
identified as Xen 4.11 (12?) but no xnf interfaces are sowing up
after boot. NetBSD has xennet0 being initiated and
guest, and potentially use
the guest's PCI access to exploit Xen.
As noted in the original Github issue, attacks on networking sub-systems
are all too common (apparently some Middle Eastern countries are
building or have built systems to mass exploit anyone who e.g connects
to a shopping mall
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:24 PM wrote:
>
> A number of people are working on integrating OpenBSD into Qubes.
>
> In particular, OpenBSD's hardening and mitigations are potentially very
> useful in talking to the NIC: Xen vulnerabilities have been repeatedly
> found that w
A number of people are working on integrating OpenBSD into Qubes.
In particular, OpenBSD's hardening and mitigations are potentially very
useful in talking to the NIC: Xen vulnerabilities have been repeatedly
found that would allow a guest with PCI access to compromise the entire
system
oth kernel
and bootloader changes. This isn’t specific to OpenBSD, btw.
Windows has the same restriction. The primary reason is that PVH mode
doesn’t expose any emulated hard drives. Unless boot(8) has support
for Xen PV block devices, this will prevent it from loading the kernel.
Is there some
Markus Kolb wrote:
> Am 24.07.2020 17:30, schrieb Theo de Raadt:
> [...]
> > non-OpenBSD bootloaders will do a shitty job of booting OpenBSD.
> > I'm not going to bother explaining the situation in detail. People
> > who try to go that way have already decided they don't care about the
> > conse
Am 24.07.2020 17:30, schrieb Theo de Raadt:
[...]
non-OpenBSD bootloaders will do a shitty job of booting OpenBSD.
I'm not going to bother explaining the situation in detail. People
who try to go that way have already decided they don't care about the
consequences.
Ok. Thanks.
Are you talking
Markus Kolb wrote:
> Am 21.07.2020 15:51, schrieb Pierre-Philipp Braun:
>
> [...]
> > GRUB2 should be able to boot an OpenBSD kernel natively *2. Thing is,
> > PVGRUB works for PV, not PVH nor PVHVM. However you might get NetBSD
> > XEN/PV up and running at you
Am 21.07.2020 15:51, schrieb Pierre-Philipp Braun:
[...]
GRUB2 should be able to boot an OpenBSD kernel natively *2. Thing is,
PVGRUB works for PV, not PVH nor PVHVM. However you might get NetBSD
XEN/PV up and running at your XEN ISP *3, by leveraging PVGRUB indeed
*3. And in case UFS is not
it sense to look into how this boot works or doesn't
> it make sense at all?!
GRUB2 should be able to boot an OpenBSD kernel natively *2. Thing is, PVGRUB
works for PV, not PVH nor PVHVM. However you might get NetBSD XEN/PV up and
running at your XEN ISP *3, by leveraging PVGRUB indee
bunch of provided Linux kernels or the
pvgrub stuff to boot from the disks.
So the only chance to get it running would be the way with the
"Xen-grub" I think, if there is no possibility that Linux has learned to
boot (not virtual) BSD ;-)
Would there be a chance to hack on the Linux-b
On 2020-07-09 05:06, Markus Kolb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a possibility to install/boot OpenBSD in a Xen guest which is booted
> by pvgrub1 or pvgrub2? The pvgrub is configured to use a /boot/grub/grub.cfg
> of the guest in the 1st partition.
>
> In a non-Xen-grub there
Hi,
is there a possibility to install/boot OpenBSD in a Xen guest which is
booted by pvgrub1 or pvgrub2? The pvgrub is configured to use a
/boot/grub/grub.cfg of the guest in the 1st partition.
In a non-Xen-grub there is a bsd-module which can boot the installer
bsd.rd, but this bsd-module
Hello,
Thank you for the reply and information.
I have also tried to use scsi controller on the VM with the same result. See
below the dmesg and VM configuration.
Also, since I do have access to the xen host, I have looked at the logs
under /var/log/xen and I found the following errors:
==>
I have no idea what is causing your backend timeout, but your VM
config would be useful information, and take a look at xend.log etc.
on the host for any related errors (if you have access to it). I'm
running OpenBSD 6.4 just fine under Xen; however my Dom0 is only 4.4.4
(dmesg attached).
Hello there,
Has anybody successfully run the 6.4 installer on a VM running on a Xen
Host?
I tried enabling more logs during boot (boot_config->verbose) and got the
following logs (extract, not full log).
Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this issue ?
Regards,
pvbus0 at mainbus0: Xen 4
Hello there,
I have been struggling to create a obsd 6.4 VM on xen(4.10.1) with HVM.
After booting from the CD (install64.iso as a virtual cdrom), the installer
cannot detect the disk to install the OS.
During the installation, the installer says: "Available disks are: none."
I alre
Hi.
my last message was hard to read because of "sneaky" linebreaks
that found there way into the mail when copying from text editor.
I'm resending this message for better readability in the archive.
Sorry about that.
Berry
---
Hi again.
After fiddeling with pf and trying to statistically de
Hi again.
On 2017-10-31 16:57, Berry Wendermouth wrote:
> I will check again with the VPS provider that the interface of the
> virtual machine is set to the correct value (virtio).
These are the current VM interface settings (anonymized):
vif = [ 'vifname=some-name, model=virtio-net, rate=100Mb/s,
On 2017-10-31 16:00, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> You went from emulated Realtek ethernet to xnf. Can you try other
> network interfaces?
How would I do this, isn't the interface auto detected by the kernel?
So in the 6.1/i386 setup, the default interface was Realtek. We had
speed problems with this
> Per your request on #openbsd, I do a short reply, to let you reply to it
> again...
Thank you very much Kirill.
> Have you tried to "download" from one of the clients, but without using
> the VPN? You could use tcpbench or iperf in server mode on one of your
> clients and do a port redirect fr
You went from emulated Realtek ethernet to xnf. Can you try other network
interfaces?
Berry Wendermouth [bayb...@riseup.net] wrote:
> Xen based VPS / OpenBSD 6.2 / OpenVPN 2.4.4 => Slow download speed after
>
Hi
Per your request on #openbsd, I do a short reply, to let you reply to it
again...
* Berry Wendermouth [2017-10-30 10:48]:
> Xen based VPS / OpenBSD 6.2 / OpenVPN 2.4.4 => Slow download speed after
>
Xen based VPS / OpenBSD 6.2 / OpenVPN 2.4.4 => Slow download speed after
upgrade
Dear OpenBSD Community,
we are operating an OpenVPN server on OpenBSD. A few days ago we
upgraded to OpenBSD 6.2
and we are
>>> factor is fairly much through the ceiling.
> >>
> >> Dell R720 and R620 servers, 10 gigabit Ethernet SAN, Dell MD3660i
> >> storage array, 1.2 TB 10K RPM SAS disks in RAID6. I don't think there
> >> is anything crappy or weird about the configuration
RAID6. I don't think there
>> is anything crappy or weird about the configuration. Test results for
>> CentOS on the same system: 170 MB/s write, 112 MB/s rewrite, 341 MB/s
>> read, 746 IOPS.
>>
>> I'm assuming that there are others running OpenBSD on Xen, so I
removed the "#" comment out
on the first line with the for loop:
hostctl: ioctl: No such file or directory
sd0 32
Regards,
M.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Looking for Xen blkfront driver xbf(4) tests
Local Time: December 13, 2016 8:46 PM
UTC Time: December 13,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 05:09 -0500, mabi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your efforts and making OpenBSD work even better on
> Xen. I use Xen for all types of virtualization and started only
> recently using OpenBSD 6.0 as domU. My current test setup is a 2
> node redundant clus
Hi,
Thanks for your efforts and making OpenBSD work even better on Xen. I use Xen
for all types of virtualization and started only recently using OpenBSD 6.0 as
domU. My current test setup is a 2 node redundant cluster with Xen 4.4.1 and
Debian 8 with DRBD for sync-replication and ZFS (RAIDZ-1
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 19:30 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've committed today a driver for the Xen paravirtualized disk
> interface also known as Blkfront. Despite being pretty stable
> for me so far, it's not enabled by default at the moment.
> Therefor
Hi,
I've committed today a driver for the Xen paravirtualized disk
interface also known as Blkfront. Despite being pretty stable
for me so far, it's not enabled by default at the moment.
Therefore I'm looking for additional tests on different Xen
versions and EC2 instances to en
On 07/20/16 04:20, Tinker wrote:
> It would be more interesting to get an idea of how a quality SSD such as
> how the Samsung PM953 / 850/950 PRO/EVO performs on various hardware
> with OpenBSD running bare-metal.
TL;DR no bonnie, but direct comparison of rotating rust vs ssd, on a
recent snapshot
On 2016-07-20 05:04, ML mail wrote:
Hi,
Here you are:
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1M count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 45.356 secs (23118558 bytes/sec)
Running OpenBSD 5.9 as domU on Xen 4.4 on DELL PowerEdge R410 with two
SATA disks in
Hi,
Here you are:
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1M count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 45.356 secs (23118558 bytes/sec)
Running OpenBSD 5.9 as domU on Xen 4.4 on DELL PowerEdge R410 with two SATA
disks in hardware RAID1 on the dom0.
RegardsML
ch through the ceiling.
>
> Dell R720 and R620 servers, 10 gigabit Ethernet SAN, Dell MD3660i
> storage array, 1.2 TB 10K RPM SAS disks in RAID6. I don't think there
> is anything crappy or weird about the configuration. Test results for
> CentOS on the same system: 170 MB/s w
s in RAID6. I don't think there
is anything crappy or weird about the configuration. Test results for
CentOS on the same system: 170 MB/s write, 112 MB/s rewrite, 341 MB/s
read, 746 IOPS.
I'm assuming that there are others running OpenBSD on Xen, so I was
hoping that someone else coul
On 2016-07-14 07:27, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
[...]
No, the tests are run sequentially. Write performance is measured
first (20 MB/s), then rewrite (12 MB/s), then read (37 MB/s), then
seeks (95 IOPS).
Okay, you are on a totally weird platform. Or, on an OK platform with a
totally weird configurat
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Tinker wrote:
> On 2016-07-13 22:57, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Tinker wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-07-13 20:01, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What do yo
On 2016-07-13 22:57, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Tinker wrote:
On 2016-07-13 20:01, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS
What do you mean 70, you mean 70 000 IOPS?
Sadly, no. It was actually 95, I looked at the wrong
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Tinker wrote:
> On 2016-07-13 20:01, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
>> We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS
>
>
> What do you mean 70, you mean 70 000 IOPS?
Sadly, no. It was actually 95, I looked at the wrong column before:
Write (K/sec), %cpu,
> We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS with
> OpenBSD 5.9 amd64 on XenServer 7.0 (tested using bonnie++). The
> virtual disks are LVM over iSCSI. Linux hosts get well over 100 MB/s
> in both directions.
>
> I'm assuming that this is because the
Hi all,
We're seeing about 20 MB/s write, 35 MB/s read, and 70 IOPS with
OpenBSD 5.9 amd64 on XenServer 7.0 (tested using bonnie++). The
virtual disks are LVM over iSCSI. Linux hosts get well over 100 MB/s
in both directions.
I'm assuming that this is because there is no disk driver f
used GENERIC.MP i would have not noticed it. Now i happily
run OpenBSD on Xen too, .MP or not .MP, thanks!
Imre
On 2016-01-19 19:48, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for taking your time to test and write a report. I've fixed
a few issues since then and was going to ask you to t
Imre Oolberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I read a news today about Xen being enabled and tried it out with the Jan
> 15th snapshot
>
> SHA256 (install59.iso) =
> 8d16aeb686a1dcc3ce6e8c5192f8708d3878f7690429c843176c5e755386e4f9
>
> on Xen v. 4.5.1 compiled from Xen sources on De
Hi!
I read a news today about Xen being enabled and tried it out with the
Jan 15th snapshot
SHA256 (install59.iso) =
8d16aeb686a1dcc3ce6e8c5192f8708d3878f7690429c843176c5e755386e4f9
on Xen v. 4.5.1 compiled from Xen sources on Debian v. 8 Jessie running
on an ordinary amd64 Intel platform
Am 2015-02-23 15:59, schrieb Joel Roberts:
My recent experience with OpenBSD under Xen ran into some problems.
First,
SMP didn't work. At the point in kernel boot where it brings up the
other
CPUs it would die. Installation of the OS worked because it used a
non-SMP
kernel. Second, o
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:17:09PM -0600, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> [...]
> the VM config files. I did have to use model=e1000 for OpenBSD, as the
> rtl8139 (re0 on openbsd) didn't work properly; I just now tested
rtl8139 emulation is from qemu, you would get same issue with qemu,
KVM... Thus, qe
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 22:17 CET, Andrew Daugherity
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Raimundo Santos wrote:
>
> > On 21 February 2015 at 10:31, Markus Kolb wrote:
> > >
> > > there isn't any support for Xen PV DomU in OpenBSD, isn&
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Raimundo Santos wrote:
> On 21 February 2015 at 10:31, Markus Kolb wrote:
> >
> > there isn't any support for Xen PV DomU in OpenBSD, isn't it?
>
> No, there is not such support.
>
> But you can run it in HVM mode withou
Am 2015-02-21 22:52, schrieb Raimundo Santos:
On 21 February 2015 at 10:31, Markus Kolb wrote:
there isn't any support for Xen PV DomU in OpenBSD, isn't it?
No, there is not such support.
But you can run it in HVM mode without effort. Well, may be some effort
in
XenServer, wher
On 21 February 2015 at 10:31, Markus Kolb wrote:
>
> there isn't any support for Xen PV DomU in OpenBSD, isn't it?
No, there is not such support.
But you can run it in HVM mode without effort. Well, may be some effort in
XenServer, where there is no easy way to chose the
Hi,
there isn't any support for Xen PV DomU in OpenBSD, isn't it?
What happened with Christoph Egger's work he is talking about in
https://archive.org/details/bsdtalk069 ?
Thanks.
Markus
Hi,
On Thursday, January 29, 2015 13:05 CET, Clément Hertling (Wxcafé)
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to run an OpenBSD virtual machine in Xen 4.4.
> The install procedure worked fine, but when I boot the VM I get a kernel
> crash.
> Linux VMs on this host work perfec
Hi
I'm trying to run an OpenBSD virtual machine in Xen 4.4.
The install procedure worked fine, but when I boot the VM I get a kernel crash.
Linux VMs on this host work perfectly fine, and as I said the installer runs ok
too, so I'm not sure what's causing this.
Following is t
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:04:22PM +0200, Andre Keller wrote:
> is any body running OpenBSD as a XEN HVM guest? I have a difficult time
> accomplish that...
Hi,
I'm insane and I do that for a long time, because I don't really have a
lot of options there.
> The XEN guest
On 07/06/12 12:29, Andre Keller wrote:
Hi Tomas
Am 07.06.2012 05:53, schrieb Tomas Bodzar:
So many panics in a such short period? Something is wrong and it's
not OpenBSD most probably ;-)
Yes I'm sure your right, that is why I was looking if someone is
actually running OpenBSD
must buy different HW or start from command line with raw switch. And
it's one of many examples.
> OS.
>
> Best Regards From Poland
> Tomasz Marszal
>
>
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:04:22 +0200, Andre Keller wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> is any body running OpenBSD as a X
i used 5.0 and 4.9. This may proof some OpenBSD problems as a guest
OS.
Best Regards From Poland
Tomasz Marszal
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:04:22 +0200, Andre Keller wrote:
> Hi
>
> is any body running OpenBSD as a XEN HVM guest? I have a difficult time
> accomplish that...
>
>
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:29:16AM +0200, Andre Keller wrote:
>> I might try KVM instead of XEN, as some offlist comments suggested
>> that it is running stable on KVM...
>
> ESXi has been used the most as host for OpenBSD,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:29:16AM +0200, Andre Keller wrote:
> I might try KVM instead of XEN, as some offlist comments suggested
> that it is running stable on KVM...
ESXi has been used the most as host for OpenBSD, but still
it is not bare-metal.
Or use your pocket money for buying a
Hi Tomas
Am 07.06.2012 05:53, schrieb Tomas Bodzar:
So many panics in a such short period? Something is wrong and it's not
OpenBSD most probably ;-)
Yes I'm sure your right, that is why I was looking if someone is
actually running OpenBSD on XEN, in the hope that such a person mi
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Andre Keller wrote:
> OK I have another one:
So many panics in a such short period? Something is wrong and it's not
OpenBSD most probably ;-)
>
> kernel: type 269 trap, code=0
> Stopped at 0: pushq %rbx
>
>
> ddb> trace
> end trace frame: 0x0, count: -
OK I have another one:
kernel: type 269 trap, code=0
Stopped at 0: pushq %rbx
ddb> trace
end trace frame: 0x0, count: -1
This one is less verbose though...
g Andre
Am 06.06.2012 17:09, schrieb Henning Brauer:
> * Andre Keller [2012-06-06 16:05]:
>> is any body running OpenBSD as a XEN HVM guest?
> nobody sane.
I hope on someone as insane as me then... :-)
>
>> ddb> trace
>> ddb> dmesg
> the actual panic is missing.
* Andre Keller [2012-06-06 16:05]:
> is any body running OpenBSD as a XEN HVM guest?
nobody sane.
> ddb> trace
> ddb> dmesg
the actual panic is missing.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hostin
Hi
is any body running OpenBSD as a XEN HVM guest? I have a difficult time
accomplish that...
The XEN guest does boot up and is usable. When f.e. do a cvs checkout of
ports the machine panics about every other time.
I know that is not really a supported configuration but if someone
managed to
> Xen is basically its own platform. If you take a look at the NetBSD
> or FreeBSD trees, you'll see that there are scads of "#ifdef XEN"
> lines throughout the kernel, including additional MMU flushing from
> the core context switch routine...and completely diffe
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
> When booting GENERIC.MP on Xen I get the following page fault trap:
>
> root on wd0a (6412ffe6504713d5.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
> clock: unknown CMOS layout
> kernel: page fault trap, code = 0
> Stopped at
>> Like http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133612760603867&w=2 ?
> He is using OpenBSD as a guest in Xen, not as a host.
Indeed.
Kind regards,
Martijn Rijkeboer
He is using OpenBSD as a guest in Xen, not as a host.
// Johan Ryberg
On May 6, 2012 3:14 PM, "Tomas Bodzar" wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Martijn Rijkeboer
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When booting GENERIC.MP on Xen I get the following page
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When booting GENERIC.MP on Xen I get the following page fault trap:
>
> B root on wd0a (6412ffe6504713d5.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
> B clock: unknown CMOS layout
> B kernel: page fault trap, code = 0
>
Hi,
When booting GENERIC.MP on Xen I get the following page fault trap:
root on wd0a (6412ffe6504713d5.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
clock: unknown CMOS layout
kernel: page fault trap, code = 0
Stopped attrap+0x6a:movq%r13,0x1f0(%r14)
ddb{1}>
When booting GENERIC all wo
d_apicid pni cx16 popcnt
> hypervisor lahf_lm cmp_legacy extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a
> misalignsse 3dnowprefetch nodeid_msr
Sorry, the flag list was accidentally taken from a /proc/cpuinfo after
booting a XEN-kernel.
With a normal kernel its flag list contains AMD's "svm":
fla
On Mon, 2 May 2011 17:21:11 +0200
Tobias Crefeld wrote:
> Any comments are welcome!
Any comments welcome about a firewall virtualised ontop of debian.
Your brave
p.s. what's debian required for?
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Tobias Crefeld wrote:
> Am Mon, 2 May 2011 11:15:57 -0500
> schrieb John Jackson :
>
>> It's probably much more straightforward to run kvm-qemu instead of
>> XEN.
>
> Hm, I'll consider this alternative. Till now our "test
On 2011-05-02, Tobias Crefeld wrote:
>
>> I've successfully run IPSEC (iked and isakmpd both work), bridging and
>> various network services this way.
>
> I moved from IPSEC to SSL/OpenVPN some years ago because it's more
> robust against packet loss but in combination with routing protocols
> lik
Am Mon, 2 May 2011 11:15:57 -0500
schrieb John Jackson :
> It's probably much more straightforward to run kvm-qemu instead of
> XEN.
Hm, I'll consider this alternative. Till now our "test-LAN" ran on
VMware but for some reasons we want to get away from VMware.
>
or else the guest will
hang on startup at Setting TTYs.
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Tobias Crefeld wrote:
> I think about installing an OpenBSD-guest on a XEN-Host (Debian
> Squeeze), all OS as 64bit-version alias "amd64". Are there any
> experiences wi
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Tobias Crefeld wrote:
> I think about installing an OpenBSD-guest on a XEN-Host (Debian
> Squeeze), all OS as 64bit-version alias "amd64". Are there any
> experiences with OpenBSD as Dom-U?
>
> The guest will be a firewalling-router with o
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Tobias Crefeld wrote:
> I think about installing an OpenBSD-guest on a XEN-Host (Debian
> Squeeze), all OS as 64bit-version alias "amd64". Are there any
> experiences with OpenBSD as Dom-U?
It's probably much more straightforward
I think about installing an OpenBSD-guest on a XEN-Host (Debian
Squeeze), all OS as 64bit-version alias "amd64". Are there any
experiences with OpenBSD as Dom-U?
The guest will be a firewalling-router with ospfd, bind, openvpn and 6
ethernet-interfaces.
Any comments are welcome
I'm trying to get a working OBSD virtual machine with networking
working as a DomU in a xen server but keep coming up again network
Watchdog Timeout errors. So I spent today trying to get PCI pass-though
working with Xen and OBSD with the belief that if I could get some
network cards int
I know arpnetworks, their price are really cool, but I need a VPS with an
API. :-(
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> There is a much higher potential of variation of implementations of xens
> and it is next to impossible to find out any particular hosts, xen
>
There is a much higher potential of variation of implementations of xens
and it is next to impossible to find out any particular hosts, xen
details.
If anyone has these details, maybe they could share, but you may have a
more reliable experience with a Linux KVM host.
arpnetworks.com (linux KVM
i try install in my xen at opensuse , when install success but when
reboot after finish installation blank and try againt same happen
againt.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Stephano Zanzin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had installed OpenBSD from a Linux VPS running
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone had installed OpenBSD from a Linux VPS running
over a Xen hosting(like slicehost, linode, etc). So, someone tried it?
--
stephano
On 11 Jan 2010, at 08:34, Pasi Kdrkkdinen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:28:02PM +0100, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
>> Is it possible?
>>
>
> I assume you mean openbsd?
>
> I don't think openbsd has Xen dom0 capable kernel available.
> You might want to ask o
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:28:02PM +0100, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
> Is it possible?
>
I assume you mean openbsd?
I don't think openbsd has Xen dom0 capable kernel available.
You might want to ask openbsd developers about it.
Netbsd has dom0 support, afaik.
-- Pasi
Dnia Eroda, 4 lutego 2009, Michael Zoet napisaE:
> Is it possible to use OpenBSD for a Xen Dom0 now? I'm tiered of
> installing Linux as the Dom0 and I want to use OpenBSD for that.
How about using NetBSD for Dom0?
--
Pozdrawiam,
Cezary Morga
"A positive attitude may no
On 10:47, Wed 04 Feb 09, Michael Zoet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I searched a little bit but found only answers to my questions form
> 2007...
>
> Is it possible to use OpenBSD for a Xen Dom0 now? I'm tiered of
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I searched a little bit but found only answers to my questions form
2007...
Is it possible to use OpenBSD for a Xen Dom0 now? I'm tiered of
installing Linux as the Dom0 and I want to use OpenBSD for that.
Another question: is it possib
>
>>> I'm looking to replace a Linux domU with a BSD one, preferably OpenBSD.
>>> Anyone any success running stable OpenBSD (FreeBSD would also suffice)
>>> as domU in a Xen system? If so, willing to share config / how-to /
>>> experience?
>>>
On 8 Feb 2008, at 14:23, NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote:
Yup, I have successfully compiled the XENU kernel, I neither now
which version it is, but it's 8 months old, I believe it was based
on -current.
The bad thing is that - when I try to run it with Xen, i get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
sfully compiled the XENU kernel, I neither now which
version it is, but it's 8 months old, I believe it was based on -current.
The bad thing is that - when I try to run it with Xen, i get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xen]# xm create -c /etc/xen/net1-obsd.xm
Using config file "/etc/xen/net1-obs
NetOne - Doichin Dokov P=P0P?P8QP0:
ropers P=P0P?P8QP0:
You can use Christoph Egger's OpenBSD/Xen port. No need to go
HVM-only. Unfortunately, my own website is down right now and I
haven't gotten around to fixing that, but the Wayback Machine has the
relevant page:
http://web.archi
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
