le again, but the point here is that, docs in OpenBSD
doesn't need for you to invest years and spend weeks full time to get to
a point that is good.
Sure I am not so young anymore so I guess I don't learn as fast as i
used to, but man the system is so clean and docs are so good, t
this is just a huge THANK YOU message...
for whatever reason, i have been "trying" to get my openbsd router
working correctly for many moons...
no reason to explain all of the mistaken paths i have had, but finally,
between the faq at https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/example1.html
and t
Roderick(hru...@gmail.com) on 2019.12.21 19:50:03 +:
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > for 6.5 onwards, all you had to was type
> >
> > sysmerge
> > sysupgrade
>
> I read somewhere that something like this was coming for 6.6, but
> I remember that I followed the i
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> for 6.5 onwards, all you had to was type
>
> sysmerge
> sysupgrade
I read somewhere that something like this was coming for 6.6, but
I remember that I followed the instructions for upgrading from 6.5
to 6.6, and this was to be done manually
"Theo de Raadt" writes:
> Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
>
>> Being able to copy the new (6.6) bsd.rd to an existing filesystem on the
>> (running) old OpenBSD system, then boot that bsd.rd to install, was
>> really really nice. Thank you!
>
> well you missed
Theo de Raadt-2 wrote
> Jonathan Thornburg <
> jthorn4242@
> > wrote:
>
>> I recently reinstalled my main laptop (which was at 6.5-stable/amd64)
>> with 6.6/amd64. Almost everything "just worked", and the things that
>> didn't were 3r
On 2019-12-20, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> well you missed out
>
> for 6.5 onwards, all you had to was type
>
> sysmerge
> sysupgrade
I think that was intended to read
syspatch
sysupgrade
> for 6.6 onwards you'll only need sysupgrade
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> I recently reinstalled my main laptop (which was at 6.5-stable/amd64)
> with 6.6/amd64. Almost everything "just worked", and the things that
> didn't were 3rd-party stuff not from OpenBSD. A big thank-you to everyone!
>
> And... a sp
I recently reinstalled my main laptop (which was at 6.5-stable/amd64)
with 6.6/amd64. Almost everything "just worked", and the things that
didn't were 3rd-party stuff not from OpenBSD. A big thank-you to everyone!
And... a specific itch-you-scratched-very-nicely I'd like
Because of your high security standards, my distro has adopted LibreSSL
and Xenocara. In the future it plans to also adopt sndio instead of that
pulse garbage.
I hope OpenBSD lasts a very, long, long time, not just for this, but
because you guys take security very seriously.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 7:54 PM, butresin wrote:
On 1109 0832, Wayne Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
Just wanted to say thanks for the hard work, OpenBSD runs better
than any
other OS on my laptop.
One thing that really stands out is suspend and resume, I have
*never* had a
Linux or Windows
On 1109 0832, Wayne Oliver wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just wanted to say thanks for the hard work, OpenBSD runs better than any
> other OS on my laptop.
> One thing that really stands out is suspend and resume, I have *never* had a
> Linux or Windows laptop do it properly.
>
> Obviously everything else
Hi All,
Just wanted to say thanks for the hard work, OpenBSD runs better than
any other OS on my laptop.
One thing that really stands out is suspend and resume, I have *never*
had a Linux or Windows laptop do it properly.
Obviously everything else works great, I just wanted to point this out
Hi All,
Just wanted to pass along my thanks for updated arm64 packages. I have
very few installed, but it's nice to see this arch isn't neglected.
Thanks to all the ports maintainers, who practically have full time
jobs maintaining all the ports. Thanks for everyone who's donated to
the project -
sional
problems with -snapshot or -current are of course to be expected), and am
seriously tempted to replace Fedora on the E550. OpenBSD is definitely the
cream of the BSD crop.
Jeff.
On 19 April 2018 at 18:02, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> Yes, thank you. Let's each of us give a pizza to show o
Yes, thank you. Let's each of us give a pizza to show our appreciation.
http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html
--
-alfred
But after upgrading to 6.3 I haven't been able
> >to
> >get it to hang and I find myself back in 'it just works' land which is
> >so, so nice. So nice.
> >
> >I don't know who to thank, and maybe the dev that fixed my issue
> >wouldn't kno
, and maybe the dev that fixed my issue
>wouldn't know *they* fixed it, but...thank you.
--
Take Care Sincerely flipchan layerprox dev
(Lenovo x200
+ coreboot + SeaBIOS). But after upgrading to 6.3 I haven't been able to
get it to hang and I find myself back in 'it just works' land which is
so, so nice. So nice.
I don't know who to thank, and maybe the dev that fixed my issue
wouldn't know *they* fixed it, but...thank you.
hich is
so, so nice. So nice.
I don't know who to thank, and maybe the dev that fixed my issue
wouldn't know *they* fixed it, but...thank you.
Just a note to bcallah@ to express great thanks for porting the chess
applications scid and stockfish-9 to OpenBSD. I'm well chuffed.
:)
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:48:34PM +, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
> Thanks Sebastien, I just figured out this. Now everything is clear.
> If I may propose something . . . those "Not found" items even if it is not an
> error, is a little bit misleading . . . From a simple user's point of view
> the pk
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:58:22PM +, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
>
>
> By the way. For a simple user (I'm using OpenBSD just for fun, and learning)
> it is worth to enable the weekly script, or not?
>
Absolutely! For "fun", check to see all of the things it does.
Do you need to run it weekly? Yo
By the way. For a simple user (I'm using OpenBSD just for fun, and learning) it
is worth to enable the weekly script, or not?
Thanks,
Zsolt
Thanks Sebastien, I just figured out this. Now everything is clear.
If I may propose something . . . those "Not found" items even if it is not an
error, is a little bit misleading . . . From a simple user's point of view the
pkg_check -F in normal circumstances should return cleanly. Maybe an ext
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:56:17PM +, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
> Another question.
> pkg_check -F uses pkg_locate script to locate package files, directories.
> pkg_locate uses locate to do that.
> Question: If I use pkg_locate bsd.rd nothing is returned, but if I use locate
> bsd.rd the ramdisk ke
Another question.
pkg_check -F uses pkg_locate script to locate package files, directories.
pkg_locate uses locate to do that.
Question: If I use pkg_locate bsd.rd nothing is returned, but if I use locate
bsd.rd the ramdisk kernel is returned. Why? Is pkg_locate not working
correctly? Or I'm miss
ave detailed information that helped me understand what was
wrong with everything I am doing :) Thank you very much for pkg_check.
When running pkg_check using the user account that I use to build
ports, I did get the type of errors the OP mentioned.
DETAILS BELOW AS ROOT
builder.ftlclo
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:51:46PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:14:51PM +, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
> > What exactly does the pkg_check -F option? If I use it, it does some
> > filesystem check, and some "Locating unknown files".
> >
> > At the end I get: "Locating unknow
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:14:51PM +, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
> What exactly does the pkg_check -F option? If I use it, it does some
> filesystem check, and some "Locating unknown files".
>
> At the end I get: "Locating unknown files: ok", "Locating unknown
> directories: ok", and a long list o
What exactly does the pkg_check -F option? If I use it, it does some
filesystem check, and some "Locating unknown files".
At the end I get: "Locating unknown files: ok", "Locating unknown directories:
ok", and a long list of "not found" directories and files, like below.
Not found:
/boo
Hello misc, package builders, port maintainers,
I've noticed that second batch of packages for OpenBSD 6.1 arrived to mirrors.
I really appreciate the time and effort you put in and I would like to thank
you all.
Jan
On 2017-04-26, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> To keep him going I suggest:
>
> http://spacehopper.org/wishlist
>
> "Exploding the phone" is taken.
> ("Estimated delivery: 23 May 2017 - 16 Jun. 2017")
>
> We all benefit :-)
Thanks! I haven't updated that list recently so it's a bit random at the
momen
To keep him going I suggest:
http://spacehopper.org/wishlist
"Exploding the phone" is taken.
("Estimated delivery: 23 May 2017 - 16 Jun. 2017")
We all benefit :-)
Marcus
stefan.wol...@web.de (Stefan Wollny), 2017.04.26 (Wed) 10:04 (CEST):
> Gesendet:??Mittwoch, 26. April 2017 um 06:16 Uhr
> V
time, security, reliability and all and that's a sadly very
simplistic list to be honest! I just wanted to take the time to say
THANK YOU!
Sadly way to many troll comments, or complains on the list and
definitely WAY TO LITTLE IF ANY thank you.
Each new release you guys make the OS better a
Ditto!
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Maurice McCarthy
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:09:05PM -0700 or thereabouts, Benjamin Heath
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This seems non-sequitur somehow, but I would simply like thank all the
> > developers of OpenBSD for continuing work on the only OS t
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:09:05PM -0700 or thereabouts, Benjamin Heath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This seems non-sequitur somehow, but I would simply like thank all the
> developers of OpenBSD for continuing work on the only OS that I really
> trust. I learn plenty just by lurking on this list. I also appr
Hi,
This seems non-sequitur somehow, but I would simply like thank all the
developers of OpenBSD for continuing work on the only OS that I really
trust. I learn plenty just by lurking on this list. I also appreciate
having a set of developers with the fortitude to entirely reject very
flawed syste
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:47:58AM -0400, Daniel Villarreal wrote:
> I'm a long-time GNU/Linux user, and in the past I've purchased the OpenBSD
> cd set and got it to running. Then I would run into issues and put it away.
>
> I decided to do something different with OpenBSD 5.5 this time. I
> app
# dmesg
console is /virtual-devices@100/console@1
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2014 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.
http://www.OpenBSD.org
OpenBSD 5.5 (GENERIC.MP) #173: Tue Mar 4 14:47:47 MS
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:02:02AM +, Dennis Davis wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > From: Gilles Chehade
> > To: Miod Vallat
> > Cc: bofh , OpenBSD general usage list
> > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:12:16
> > Subject: Re: OpenSMTPD
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> From: Gilles Chehade
> To: Miod Vallat
> Cc: bofh , OpenBSD general usage list
> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:12:16
> Subject: Re: OpenSMTPD - thank you!
>
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:08:52PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > &
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:08:52PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Don't be a tease!! What's in -current?
>
> Ponies. Lots of'em.
>
folding ponies into envelopes turned out to be gross, we gave up.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
> Don't be a tease!! What's in -current?
Ponies. Lots of'em.
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:02:45PM -0500, bofh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Oh, and if you liked what's in 5.2, you will love what's in -current !
>
> Don't be a tease!! What's in -current? And I see 5.3-beta is tagged
everything has been commited, you jus
Also look at: http://www.openbsd.org/plus.html
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le samedi 02 février 2013 à 18:08 -0500, bofh a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:02 PM, bofh wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Gil
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:02 PM, bofh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> Oh, and if you liked what's in 5.2, you will love what's in -current !
>
> Don't be a tease!! What's in -current? And I see 5.3-beta is tagged
> already... Are you talking about 5.3 or post 5
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Oh, and if you liked what's in 5.2, you will love what's in -current !
Don't be a tease!! What's in -current? And I see 5.3-beta is tagged
already... Are you talking about 5.3 or post 5.3...? :)
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
h
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 05:43:53PM -0500, Joe Gidi wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> So, I'd just like to say "thanks" to the OpenBSD and OpenSMTPD devs for
> making such a friendly, usable, *SANE* MTA. Keep up the great work!
>
You're welcome ;-)
Oh, and if you liked what's in 5.2, you will love what's in
I started out this afternoon with a very simple goal: get sendmail on an
OpenBSD 5.2 box to relay mail to a smarthost (preferably using TLS), so
that sensorsd can send out alerts to my phone if something goes wrong.
After a solid two hours of trial and error, reading man pages and READMEs,
and pra
Ok then give me 1 milion $ for fund fees after that i can help you to go jail
. :)
>
> From: Mr.Mou and Family
> Sent: Tue Aug 07 19:01:09 CEST 2012
> To:
> Subject: Thank you
>
>
> Hello
>
> I solicit your assistance to r
Hello
I solicit your assistance to received funds on my behalf for the assistance of
the needy out there,when you respond I will give you full details of myself and
funds.
Regards.
Mou and family
MSNBC works now. I'm in London so this means I can see the MSNBC site.
Thank you.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Peter Laufenberg
wrote:
> if you ssh from Windows try Bitvise Tunnelier instead of putty. If you ssh
from *nix... just use ssh.
Fine for individual use, problematic in bigger environment because of
license/price
>
> -- p
>
>> B B Hello, An
if you ssh from Windows try Bitvise Tunnelier instead of putty. If you ssh from
*nix... just use ssh.
-- p
> Hello, And thank you for an awsome product...I am a novice,
>(just starting out in the linux/unix/bsd world), been a windows server guy and
>3d modeler/animator
Hello, And thank you for an awsome product...I am a novice,
(just starting out in the linux/unix/bsd world), been a windows server guy and
3d modeler/animator, graphic artist for the last 20 years.I was always afraid
of unix, until recently, I purchased two sun netra x1's, a
Alan Cheng wrote:
> simple & clean, is one of the reasons I like OB ~
>
FUNNY ABBREVIATION ALERT !
Where I live OB is a brand of tampons, so you just made yourself sound like
one of their slogans !
LOL
;s fantastic.
>
> I use FreeBSD on my file-server to take advantage of ZFS and all their
> convoluted versions/branches are just... a pain.
>
> So thank you all for keeping it simple, clean and efficient.
>
> --
> ESP
pain.
So thank you all for keeping it simple, clean and efficient.
--
ESP
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Ouellet wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:30:47PM -0400:
> No one SADLY really thank you
Actually, there were quite a few mails recently saying "thank you".
> YOU give us
We also do it for ourselves. :)
But yes, publishing code and getting feedback from pe
+1 Very well put Daniel
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many things got me to want to write a quick thank you note to the devs for
> a long time and as many things goes, times fly and sadly I keep putting it
> off.
>
> But, I guess some of
Hi,
Many things got me to want to write a quick thank you note to the devs
for a long time and as many things goes, times fly and sadly I keep
putting it off.
But, I guess some of the very disgraceful emails one misc@ lately
including some totally off topics f*cked up one about OpenBSD
It's been a while since I've upgraded a box (or ran the installer for that
matter) and this was the first time I used the bsd.rd kernel to do it.
I'd like to give a massive thank you to all the developers who have worked on
the new installer and upgrade documentation, it made
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 09:13:45AM +1100, Aaron Mason wrote:
> Hang on... isn't ftp_proxy defined in rc.conf?
It is, but I had already set ftpproxy_flags="" in rc.conf.local so users
could ftp out, so I needed a second instance for inbound connections.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html#natse
lter Rules for FTP Server (additon to above)
> pass in on egress proto tcp to $ftp_ext port $ftp_port
> pass out on internal proto tcp to $ftp_int port $ftp_port user proxy
>
> in /etc/rc.local
> . /etc/pf.macros
> echo -n ' ftp-proxy (internal)';
> /usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -
n internal proto tcp to $ftp_int port $ftp_port user proxy
in /etc/rc.local
. /etc/pf.macros
echo -n ' ftp-proxy (internal)';
/usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -R $ftp_int -p $ftp_port -b $ftp_ext
Thank you! (for that and much more)
l8rZ,
--
andrew - ICQ# 253198 - Jabber: and...@rraz.net
A print
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:27:00PM +0200, zexel wrote:
>> OpenBSD manpages are the best out there without doubt.
>> A clear example of how thing should be done.
>I will agree with this.
As will I. After years of frustration with various Linux distributions
and wireless, I'd deferred dealing with
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:28:40PM +0200, Torbj?rn H. Orskaug wrote:
> Speaking of outstanding documentation in the form of manual pages, why
> do the preformatted GNU man pages have a right margin of ~66 characters,
> while the BSD ones render nicely at about 80 characters?
i think this is probab
Speaking of outstanding documentation in the form of manual pages, why
do the preformatted GNU man pages have a right margin of ~66 characters,
while the BSD ones render nicely at about 80 characters? How would I
proceed to slap some "GNU" sense into the offending pages?
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 08:50:31AM +0200, Francesco Vollero wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 16/07/2009 alle 22.27 +0200, zexel ha scritto:
> > Jean-Frangois SIMON escribis:
> > > I just would like to thank the authors of the project documentation for
> > > its
> > > real quality.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
Il giorno gio, 16/07/2009 alle 22.27 +0200, zexel ha scritto:
> Jean-Frangois SIMON escribis:
> > I just would like to thank the authors of the project documentation for its
> > real quality.
> >
> >
> >
> OpenBSD manpages are the best out there without doubt.
> A clear example of how thing shou
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:27:00PM +0200, zexel wrote:
> OpenBSD manpages are the best out there without doubt.
> A clear example of how thing should be done.
I will agree with this.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
(Freelance software developer / technical writer / open-source developer)
http://s
Jean-Frangois SIMON escribis:
I just would like to thank the authors of the project documentation for its
real quality.
OpenBSD manpages are the best out there without doubt.
A clear example of how thing should be done.
I just would like to thank the authors of the project documentation for its
real quality.
htly late in responding to this, but hey:
>
> Michael Grigoni wrote:
>
>
>>>>> William Chivers wrote:
>
>
>>> Thank you Theo and your team of developers for OpenBSD.
>> I also add my thanks to the discussion. I do have a fundamental question to
&g
responding to this, but hey:
Michael Grigoni wrote:
William Chivers wrote:
Thank you Theo and your team of developers for OpenBSD.
I also add my thanks to the discussion. I do have a fundamental question to
pose however...
First, let me add my thanks to Theo and the guys for the
And can I ask you Michael what any of this has to do with my original post?
Look at the subject.
Why not start your own thread instead of hi-jacking someone else's?
Bill
-
William J. Chivers
Lecturer in Information Technology
School of DCIT
Faculty of
* Michael Grigoni [2009-04-30 21:42]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
>> * Michael Grigoni [2009-04-30 19:51]:
>
>
>>
>> we do not tend to drop support for hardware. happens for really really
>> ancient stuff (>10years) from time to time, but even that seldom.
>
> In the context of this discussion, th
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Michael Grigoni [2009-04-30 19:51]:
we do not tend to drop support for hardware. happens for really really
ancient stuff (>10years) from time to time, but even that seldom.
In the context of this discussion, the hardware is about 17 years old.
if you spent your
* Michael Grigoni [2009-04-30 19:51]:
> I agree online threats change; my argument is for a stable core o/s, with
> patches made for threat mitigation and stable API and ABI and configuration
> within a major release number, to make life easier for small shops that
> can't afford to shoot at movin
Steve Fairhead wrote:
Second, you mentioned embedded work, which is my main work area. Yes,
embedded stuff needs to be stable long-term - but the Internet isn't:
threats change, and OpenBSD evolves. A classic solution to that (which I've
used) is to simply accept that the legacy embedded stuff
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
>
> Is it troll-week on m...@?
>
if only it could be confined to one week a year...
Idea
> to just spread all this in public, ill just blindly take Theo's Side without
> a doubt. Hopefully OpenBSD, the Project, can navigate this stormy Season
> without harm and continue to be the best OS there is.
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:30:06PM +1100, William Chivers
Slightly late in responding to this, but hey:
Michael Grigoni wrote:
>> William Chivers wrote:
> Thank you Theo and your team of developers for OpenBSD.
>
> Some people responding to the "European Orders" thread seem to have lost
sight of what OpenBSD is and who dev
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Michael Grigoni wrote:
> A modular approach to an O/S would be welcome; say a major version every five
> years, with an a la carte menu of features, which are subject to versioning
> much like there is a 'version 3 MS-Windows', with known performance
> characteristics
> and r
Michael Grigoni writes:
> I also add my thanks to the discussion. I do have a fundamental
> question to pose however. It seems that opensource culture for
> large projects is driven by featurism and the need to make massive
> changes incorporated into frequent releases. I come from a
> backgrou
oject, can navigate this stormy Season
without harm and continue to be the best OS there is.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:30:06PM +1100, William Chivers wrote:
Hello,
Thank you Theo and your team of developers for OpenBSD.
Some people responding to the "European Orders" thread seem to
tormy Season
without harm and continue to be the best OS there is.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:30:06PM +1100, William Chivers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you Theo and your team of developers for OpenBSD.
>
> Some people responding to the "European Orders" thread seem to have lo
* Michael Grigoni [2009-03-31 04:38]:
> A modular approach to an O/S would be welcome; say a major version every five
> years, with an a la carte menu of features, which are subject to versioning
> and upgrade over that period, and maintenance of a stable set of APIs, ABIs
> and configuration file
> I also add my thanks to the discussion. I do have a fundamental question
> to pose however. It seems that opensource culture for large projects
> is driven by featurism and the need to make massive changes incorporated
> into frequent releases.
> I come from a background of very long-term
> sta
William Chivers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you Theo and your team of developers for OpenBSD.
>
> Some people responding to the "European Orders" thread seem to have lost
> sight of what OpenBSD is and who develops it. I am a bit of a newbie here
> (although I
Hello,
Thank you Theo and your team of developers for OpenBSD.
Some people responding to the "European Orders" thread seem to have lost sight
of what OpenBSD is and who develops it. I am a bit of a newbie here (although I
have been using computers in my career since 1972), but it s
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:02:26PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2009/1/26 uday :
> > I just wanted thank the developers and contributors of Relayd. It's a
> > wonderful load balancer, very well written GOOD JOB guys ! FYI, you
> > saved us 75,000$ in F5 equipments.
>
> Surely you need a support
2009/1/26 uday :
> I just wanted thank the developers and contributors of Relayd. It's a
> wonderful load balancer, very well written GOOD JOB guys ! FYI, you
> saved us 75,000$ in F5 equipments.
Surely you need a support contract?
http://www.dixongroup.net/?q=openbsd#enterprise
Best
Martin
I'm negotiating a community contribution budget for all the open
source software we're using. It should be a good thing for the
community.
um.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Dag Richards wrote:
> I assume that your company will send say 10% of that saved cash to the
> project now to ensure con
I assume that your company will send say 10% of that saved cash to the
project now to ensure continued development and maintenance ?
;)
On 1/26/09 9:32 AM, uday wrote:
I just wanted thank the developers and contributors of Relayd. It's a
wonderful load balancer, very well written GOOD JOB
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:32 PM, uday wrote:
> I just wanted thank the developers and contributors of Relayd. It's a
> wonderful load balancer, very well written GOOD JOB guys ! FYI, you
> saved us 75,000$ in F5 equipments.
>
> um
>
>
Why don't you donate some of that to the project!
I just wanted thank the developers and contributors of Relayd. It's a
wonderful load balancer, very well written GOOD JOB guys ! FYI, you
saved us 75,000$ in F5 equipments.
um
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 13:46 -0800, Jon wrote:
> on some learning paths here. This mailing list is awesome. Thank you.
just remember that when 4.3 CD pre-release-sales are announced :)
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.
I solved the problem with (I believe it was) the first response out of
the four or five I got almost immediately.
I got four _separate_ completely valid solutions and this has pointed me
on some learning paths here. This mailing list is awesome. Thank you.
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
