real mem = 2147483648 (2048MB)
avail mem = 2098364416 (2001MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root: Sun Blade 100 (UltraSPARC-IIe)
cpu0 at mainbus0: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIe (rev 1.4) @ 502 MHz
cpu0: physical 16K instruction (32 b/l), 16K data (32 b/l), 256K external (64
Could it be memory ? hard disk ? Box has a 256mb + 512mb , and i don't
know
a way to test this memory without os on the box. Smth like memconf
There should be a memtest_obp_sparc whatever -- there's already one for
the OBP platform on the Apple PowerPC platform. Most Sun shops have
everythi
2007/6/7, Maxim Belooussov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > I'm starting to suspect hardware, because even with this OBP upgrade i
> > didn't manage to start the install of FreeBSD/sparc, NetBSD/sparc64, and
> > various flavors of Linux/Sparc. All the installers start a kernel, and
> hangs
> > at var
On 6/7/07, Landry Breuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/6/7, Landry Breuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> 2007/5/31, Ted Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I had the same problem until I updated the firmware to 4.17.1
>
> -Ted
> >
> > Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > i'm trying to i
2007/6/7, Landry Breuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> 2007/5/31, Ted Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I had the same problem until I updated the firmware to 4.17.1
>
> -Ted
> >
> > Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > i'm trying to install OpenBSD/Sparc64 on a Blade 100, tried various
>
2007/5/31, Ted Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I had the same problem until I updated the firmware to 4.17.1
-Ted
>
> Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > i'm trying to install OpenBSD/Sparc64 on a Blade 100, tried various
> > methods/versions (all described in INSTALL.sparc64), they all fail
2007/5/31, Markus Lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:49:45PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > i'm trying to install OpenBSD/Sparc64 on a Blade 100, tried various
> > methods/versions (all described in INSTALL.sparc64), they all fail after
> > 'Trying bsd' and
I had the same problem until I updated the firmware to 4.17.1
-Ted
Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm trying to install OpenBSD/Sparc64 on a Blade 100, tried various
> methods/versions (all described in INSTALL.sparc64), they all fail after
> 'Trying bsd' and stall. Where can i have a sta
Hello,
i'm trying to install OpenBSD/Sparc64 on a Blade 100, tried various
methods/versions (all described in INSTALL.sparc64), they all fail after
'Trying bsd' and stall. Where can i have a start point to debug what
happens/doesn't happen ?
I've tried :
- 3.9-release Cdrom (original version
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Simon Morgan wrote:
http://16hz.net/~simon/SunBlade100/xorg.conf
Thanks a lot! The following line under Section "Device" also
solved my problems with the Sun GDM-20D10 monitor and Blade 100:
Option "reference_clock" "28.636MHz"
I had tested every modeline I could find f
On 17/11/05, Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You did read /usr/X11R6/README, did you ? use
Evidently not. I do remember reading about that file (I did read the
FAQ) but got a bit sidetracked and forgot about it. Sorry.
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identifier "Mouse0"
>
Simon Morgan wrote:
On 17/11/05, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Errr jumped the gun...was it the resolution at 1152 something...or was it
something else?
http://16hz.net/~simon/SunBlade100/xorg.conf
It's not exactly pushing my monitor to its limits but it works and
theres not
On 11/17/05, Simon Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/11/05, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Errr jumped the gun...was it the resolution at 1152 something...or was it
> > something else?
>
> http://16hz.net/~simon/SunBlade100/xorg.conf
>
> It's not exactly pushing my monitor
On 17/11/05, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had a U5 270? 330? Mhz for a year or two; the only way to get into
> 1280x1024 (the max res of the monitor that it shipped with) was to drop
> into 8bpp. At 16/24 bpp, with the 8mb integrated ATI Rage 64 something
> something garbag,
On 17/11/05, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Errr jumped the gun...was it the resolution at 1152 something...or was it
> something else?
http://16hz.net/~simon/SunBlade100/xorg.conf
It's not exactly pushing my monitor to its limits but it works and
theres not much poing tweeking it
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Simon Morgan wrote:
On 17/11/05, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had a U5 270? 330? Mhz for a year or two; the only way to get into
1280x1024 (the max res of the monitor that it shipped with) was to drop
into 8bpp. At 16/24 bpp, with the 8mb integrated ATI
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Simon Morgan wrote:
On 17/11/05, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just dont see 8mb video cards making it to 1280x1024 at 24/16bpp
I've now managed to get a display up. Many thanks to you and everyone
else who offered advice. Unfortunately the mouse is
On 17/11/05, Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't used OpenBSD for some time (can't seem to get around to
> unsubscribing from the list...), but I'm interested to know what
> version of X.org you're using.
X Window System Version 6.8.2
Release Date: 9 February 2005
X Protocol Versi
I had a U5 270? 330? Mhz for a year or two; the only way to get into
1280x1024 (the max res of the monitor that it shipped with) was to drop
into 8bpp. At 16/24 bpp, with the 8mb integrated ATI Rage 64 something
something garbag, you had to use m64config(8) and put the frambuffer in
...1152x10
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Simon Morgan wrote:
I added that along with Modes "1280x1024" (which I've added before
at various stages) and now, instead of an error from my monitor, I
just get a black screen. I've uploaded the latest copies of
xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log for anyone that may be interested.
On 17/11/05, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait...1280x1024 or 1600x1200 w/ 8MB of RAM? Is that right? Onboard
> video only occupies 8MB?
Sorry, yes. AFAIK the onboard video is 8MB.
On 17/11/05, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait...1280x1024 or 1600x1200 w/ 8MB of RAM? Is that right? Onboard
> video only occupies 8MB?
1280x1024. I should have mentioned in my original post that I'm using
a Sony TFT and its maximum/optimum resolution is 1280x1024.
> (II) ATI(
picking a modeline.
Xorg/XFree don't shine.
~BAS
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 18:35, Simon Morgan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Sun Blade 100 and have just installed OpenBSD 3.8 on it and so far
> I'm
> very impressed. NetBSD, the supposed king of multi-platform, doesn't
&
Hi,
I have a Sun Blade 100 and have just installed OpenBSD 3.8 on it and so far I'm
very impressed. NetBSD, the supposed king of multi-platform, doesn't
even support the keyboard! This is 5 year old hardware!
Anyway, the problem I'm having is with X.org. Whenever I try and ru
24 matches
Mail list logo
