Hi,
Since the release of OpenBSD 7.2, snmp mibtree is broken:
> root@host:~# snmp mibtree
> snmp: No securityName specified
Greetings,
Matthias
--
genua GmbH
Domagkstraße 7, 85551 Kirchheim bei München
T +49 89 991950-0, F -999, www.genua.de
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Ochs, Marc
12:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > On 2022-12-09, Byron Klippert wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > I get an snmp protocol error response when attempting to `snmp get`
>> > > certain OIDs on various devices. However `tcpdump` shows that the d
On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:35 -0700, Byron Klippert wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2022, at 12:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022-12-09, Byron Klippert wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I get an snmp protocol error response when attempting to `snmp get`
> >
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022, at 12:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-12-09, Byron Klippert wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I get an snmp protocol error response when attempting to `snmp get` certain
>> OIDs on various devices. However `tcpdump` shows that the device is actua
On 2022-12-09, Byron Klippert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I get an snmp protocol error response when attempting to `snmp get` certain
> OIDs on various devices. However `tcpdump` shows that the device is actually
> responding with the anticipated result but it appears snmp isn't
Hello,
I get an snmp protocol error response when attempting to `snmp get` certain
OIDs on various devices. However `tcpdump` shows that the device is actually
responding with the anticipated result but it appears snmp isn't able to parse
the response correctly? Any suggestions on h
On 2022-10-19, Alec wrote:
>
>>However I think you could /probably/ already implement this yourself by
>>calling snmp(1) 'trap' from sensorsd if you wanted this now.
>
> Ah, for that we have wonderful swiss-knife called "ifstated" that can be
> abu
is not actually very useful). This would probably best be done in
>conjunction with sensorsd and its configuration language (perhaps even
>moving the whole sensors mib there from snmpd-metrics, though that
>might be overkill).
>However I think you could /probably/ already implement this yours
r itself report 'critical'" which
IME is not actually very useful). This would probably best be done in
conjunction with sensorsd and its configuration language (perhaps even
moving the whole sensors mib there from snmpd-metrics, though that
might be overkill).
However I think you
Sorry about that.Was trying to keep all lines short.
>Are the tables also used or did you add the persist keyword to them?
>If not the optimiser will remove them and empty snmp tables will return
>the noSuchObject exception.
Hmm, I have about 15 tables, some are empty some have
> ::= { pfTblAddrEntry 1 }
> Which translates to OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.30155.1.9.129.1.1 (if I am not mistaken).
> If I do snmp walk of the whole 1.3 I can see that after
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.30155.1.9.128 the next OID is 1.3.6.1.4.1.30155.1.10.1.0, so
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.30155.1.9.129
"The index value which uniquely identifies the table which
contains this pfTblAddrNet/pfTblAddrMask pair." ::= {
pfTblAddrEntry 1 }
Which translates to OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.30155.1.9.129.1.1 (if I am not mistaken).
If I do snmp walk of the whole 1.3 I can see
, October 19, 2022 at 02:27:17 p.m. GMT+9, Martijn van Duren
wrote:
On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 05:13 +, All wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anyone know where I can find the list of snmp traps that are supported
> by OpenBSD?
Even though a lot of work has been done lately in snmp land, traps are
still o
On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 05:13 +, Alec wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anyone know where I can find the list of snmp traps that are supported
> by OpenBSD?
Even though a lot of work has been done lately in snmp land, traps are
still one of the main tickets I need to address. Right now only
col
Hi,
Does anyone know where I can find the list of snmp traps that are supported by
OpenBSD?
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 09:24:47AM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 15:59 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2021-11-05, Joel Carnat wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I read in relayd.conf(5) that there is an SNMP agentx feature.
On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 15:59 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021-11-05, Joel Carnat wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I read in relayd.conf(5) that there is an SNMP agentx feature. And
> > there is an OPENBSD-RELAYD-MIB.txt file in 7.0 /usr/share/snmp/mibs
> > direct
On 2021-11-05, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I read in relayd.conf(5) that there is an SNMP agentx feature. And
> there is an OPENBSD-RELAYD-MIB.txt file in 7.0 /usr/share/snmp/mibs
> directory.
>
> But in snmpd.conf(5), I couldn't found any reference for subagen
Hello,
I read in relayd.conf(5) that there is an SNMP agentx feature. And
there is an OPENBSD-RELAYD-MIB.txt file in 7.0 /usr/share/snmp/mibs
directory.
But in snmpd.conf(5), I couldn't found any reference for subagent or
agentx. Reading the sources logs, I understood that agentx was re
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 11:48, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:51:25AM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
>
> >
> > Am I missing something here or could it be a potential bug in the VXLAN
> > code in how it reports into snmpd?
>
> The vxlan driver counts something that the network stack d
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:51:25AM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if anyone else here is using SNMP for obtaining VXLAN(4) adapter
> throughput but after some testing (clamping with PF queues), I have
> discovered that throughput on VXLAN interfaces via SNMP are repo
Hi,
Not sure if anyone else here is using SNMP for obtaining VXLAN(4) adapter
throughput but after some testing (clamping with PF queues), I have
discovered that throughput on VXLAN interfaces via SNMP are reporting
exactly double the data throughput than what is measured either through
iperf or
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:49 AM Stanley van Dijk wrote:
> Could anyone help me out with what I'm looking at?
>
> This comes from an snmp mib:
>
> hw.sensors.it0.volt0=1.34 VDC (VCORE_A)
> hw.sensors.it0.volt1=1.92 VDC (VCORE_B)
>
> What is vcore_a and what is vcore
Hi all,
Could anyone help me out with what I'm looking at?
This comes from an snmp mib:
hw.sensors.it0.volt0=1.34 VDC (VCORE_A)
hw.sensors.it0.volt1=1.92 VDC (VCORE_B)
What is vcore_a and what is vcore_b?
BR,
Stan
Subject: Re: Getting Dell RAID status via SNMP
> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:08:47 -0500
>
> >> Here is new/WIP patch to support bio(4) for mfii(4). it doesn't fix the
> >> "issue" yet, but it includes hot swap support from my patch for mfi(4)
> >> http://mar
Hi,
From: Andrew Daugherity
Subject: Re: Getting Dell RAID status via SNMP
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:08:47 -0500
>> Here is new/WIP patch to support bio(4) for mfii(4). it doesn't fix the
>> "issue" yet, but it includes hot swap support from my patch for mfi(4)
>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:10 AM, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From: Jibby Jeremiah
> Subject: Re: Getting Dell RAID status via SNMP
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:03:21 -0400
>
> > Darn. Well if you need more testers let me know.
>
> It seems your RAID card does
Hi,
From: Jibby Jeremiah
Subject: Re: Getting Dell RAID status via SNMP
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:03:21 -0400
> Darn. Well if you need more testers let me know.
It seems your RAID card doesn't have cache,
> mfii0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS3008&
Darn. Well if you need more testers let me know.
On 2017-07-18 19:45, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2017-07-18, Jibby Jeremiah wrote:
Stuart H wrote :
So for now you would need to run bioctl to fetch status for this.
Thanks again Stuart. But I look at the man page and it is not clear
to me
how to use this:
[root@myname ~]# bioctl -q sd0
On 2017-07-18, Jibby Jeremiah wrote:
> Stuart H wrote :
>> So for now you would need to run bioctl to fetch status for this.
>
> Thanks again Stuart. But I look at the man page and it is not clear to me
> how to use this:
>
> [root@myname ~]# bioctl -q sd0
> sd0: , serial 0077a1dc0b3da755200084
Stuart H wrote :
> So for now you would need to run bioctl to fetch status for this.
Thanks again Stuart. But I look at the man page and it is not clear to me
how to use this:
[root@myname ~]# bioctl -q sd0
sd0: , serial 0077a1dc0b3da755200084e6a0a06d86
[root@myname ~]# bioctl -i sd0
sd0: , se
On 2017-07-18, Jibby Jeremiah wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Stuart.
>
> We are running 6.0 and here is dmesg - I x'ed out some info on this second
> line - do not think it was important
Thanks - so this is using mfii(4), the driver for this doesn't implement
sensors yet (it's about the only one t
Thanks for the reply Stuart.
We are running 6.0 and here is dmesg - I x'ed out some info on this second
line - do not think it was important
OpenBSD 6.0-stable (GENERIC.MP) #1: Mon Feb 13 13:59:48 EST 2017
bsduser@-XXX-X-XX:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/
GENERIC.MP
RTC
On 2017-07-17, Jibby Jeremiah wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> On HP HW we can query the RAID status of a system remotely with snmpwalk on
>
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.30155.2.1.2.1.5.3
>
> And you get back a status of one of the following 3 :
> - online
> - pfail
> - rebuild
>
> Works great!
This provides access to '
Hi folks,
On HP HW we can query the RAID status of a system remotely with snmpwalk on
.1.3.6.1.4.1.30155.2.1.2.1.5.3
And you get back a status of one of the following 3 :
- online
- pfail
- rebuild
Works great!
I cannot find a RAID status on a Dell though. I do a walk of
1.3.6.1.4.1.30155
On 2017-06-06, mabi wrote:
> Thanks Stuart for your input. In the pass I used the snmp daemon which comes
> with OpenBSD but I vaguely remember that some OID for my cacti graphs was
> missing so I switched to Net-SNMP which had this information. Can't remember
> though which
Thanks Stuart for your input. In the pass I used the snmp daemon which comes
with OpenBSD but I vaguely remember that some OID for my cacti graphs was
missing so I switched to Net-SNMP which had this information. Can't remember
though which OID that was and that was already a few years ago
On 2017-06-04, mabi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using OpenBSD 6.1 the the Net-SNMP port in order to monitor the system
> resources. I don't seem to find any OID for the free memory and was wondering
> if this information is simply not made available in SNMP. Doing an snmpwalk
>
Hi,
I am using OpenBSD 6.1 the the Net-SNMP port in order to monitor the system
resources. I don't seem to find any OID for the free memory and was wondering
if this information is simply not made available in SNMP. Doing an snmpwalk on
the HOST-RESOURCES MIB for memory shows the foll
llo,
Thanks for the idea, but how are you triggering a script on polling ?
BTW, I think that if snmp is not available I will stick to check_relayd wth
NRPE.
Cf. http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20110220204953
--
Cordialement,
Pierre BARDOU
De : Mik J [mailto:mikyde...@yahoo.fr]
E
Hello,
Thanks for the idea, but how are you triggering a script on polling ?
BTW, I think that if snmp is not available I will stick to check_relayd wth
NRPE.
Cf. http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20110220204953
--
Cordialement,
Pierre BARDOU
De : Mik J [mailto:mikyde...@yaho
Hello Pierre,I don't use relayd but for some of my needs with snmp, I retrieve
the statistics through a script that is executed everytime I poll a specific
OID.It might be dirty, but does the job.Regards
Le Mardi 7 mars 2017 16h08, BARDOU Pierre a écrit :
I found nothing to impl
Objet : Monitoring relayd via SNMP
Hello,
I am trying to monitor relayd through snmpd(8).
It seems that a MIB exists :
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/share/snmp/OPENBSD-RELAYD-MIB.tx
t?rev=1.3&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
But SNMPwalking these OIDs doesn't work.
sn
Hello,
I am trying to monitor relayd through snmpd(8).
It seems that a MIB exists :
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/share/snmp/OPENBSD-RELAYD-MIB.tx
t?rev=1.3&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
But SNMPwalking these OIDs doesn't work.
snmpctl show mib doesn't show t
Hi,
does snmpd support v3 SNMP traps? As I was trying to get
ASAP a v3 trap receiver and I got:
# snmpd -d
snmpe_bind: binding to address 10.34.130.229:161
startup
unsupported SNMP trap version '3'
I used this from a RHEL 7:
snmptrap -e 0x0102030405 -v 3 -u user1 -a SHA -A pass
On 2016-02-26, Alex Naumov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just want to ask why our snmpd(8) doesn't understand MIBs from UCD-SNMP-MIB.
> Is there some workaround?
>
> I need information about CPU and Memory usage...
>
>
> OpenBSD 5.6 GENERIC#274 i386
> net-snmp-5.7.2.1
Hello,
just want to ask why our snmpd(8) doesn't understand MIBs from UCD-SNMP-MIB.
Is there some workaround?
I need information about CPU and Memory usage...
OpenBSD 5.6 GENERIC#274 i386
net-snmp-5.7.2.1p2
Thank you,
Alex
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 10:34:01AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015-10-04, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > Are there any packages out there that expose OpenBGPd or other OpenBSD
> > parameters via SNMP? Would like to check generic health of the system,
> > number of ro
On 2015-10-04, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Are there any packages out there that expose OpenBGPd or other OpenBSD
> parameters via SNMP? Would like to check generic health of the system,
> number of routes, number of peers, number of routes per peer, etc.
System sensors ("sysctl hw
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:59:24PM BST, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Are there any packages out there that expose OpenBGPd or other OpenBSD
> parameters via SNMP? Would like to check generic health of the system,
> number of routes, number of peers, number of routes per peer, etc.
ls /usr/s
Are there any packages out there that expose OpenBGPd or other OpenBSD
parameters via SNMP? Would like to check generic health of the system, number
of routes, number of peers, number of routes per peer, etc.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
debug shortly.
> >
> >-Steve S.
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
> >>Stuart Henderson
> >>Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 5:58 AM
> >>To: misc@openbsd.org
> &g
he debug shortly.
-Steve S.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Stuart Henderson
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 5:58 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: SNMP on 5.7/5.8
On 2015-08-04, Steven Surdock wrote:
The broken SNMP on i38
odebase sharing nothing in common
with Net-SNMP, if there's a problem there as well then relevant bits of
"snmpd -dv" would be nice (bugs@ is probably the best place for that).
] On Behalf Of
> Stuart Henderson
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 5:58 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: SNMP on 5.7/5.8
>
> On 2015-08-04, Steven Surdock wrote:
> > The broken SNMP on i386/5.7 is preventing me from upgrading. I tried
> i386/5.8 but I'm s
On 2015-08-04, Steven Surdock wrote:
> The broken SNMP on i386/5.7 is preventing me from upgrading. I tried
> i386/5.8 but I'm still seeing net-snmpd crash with the following error.
>
>NET-SNMP version 5.7.3
>Error expanding HCInReceives to 64bits in ipSystemStatsT
Steven Surdock engineered-net.com> writes:
>
> Just noticed that I'm having the same issue on 5.7/i386
>
> NET-SNMP version 5.7.3
> Error expanding HCInReceives to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4
> Error expanding HCInDelivers to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTa
The broken SNMP on i386/5.7 is preventing me from upgrading. I tried i386/5.8
but I'm still seeing net-snmpd crash with the following error.
NET-SNMP version 5.7.3
Error expanding HCInReceives to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4
Error expanding HCInDelivers to 64bi
Just noticed that I'm having the same issue on 5.7/i386
NET-SNMP version 5.7.3
Error expanding HCInReceives to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4
Error expanding HCInDelivers to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4
Error expanding HCOutRequests to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4
-Steve S.
Hi,
Does anybody have problems with snmp high counters on i386 platforms?
snmpd crashes after a while.
Error expanding HCInReceives to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4
Error expanding HCInDelivers to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4
Error expanding HCOutRequests to 64bits in
ntext 1 request 1293928297
snmpe_parsevarbinds: 10.15.5.2: oid
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.openBSD.pfMIBObjects.pfTables.pfTblAddrTable.pfTblAddrEntry.pfTblAddrTblIndex.3.XXX.XX.187.0.24
snmpe_parsevarbinds: 10.15.5.2: invalid varbind element, error index 1
> I.e. Run snmpd on 127.0.0.1:161, and run net-snmp on the interface I
. "If no OID argument
> is present, snmpwalk will search the subtree rooted at SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2
> (including any MIB object values from other MIB modules, that are
> defined as lying within this subtree)."
>
> The following examples assume that you have the OpenBSD MIBs
following examples assume that you have the OpenBSD MIBs loaded (these
are setup by default in the net-snmp package, but you'll need to add them
yourself if querying from another OS).
$ snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID
SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.1 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2
SNMPv2-MIB::
Hi,
This should be a simple one ;)
I have configured and started snmpd, and then used snmpwalk ("snmpwalk
-v2c -c public 127.0.0.1:161 .") to walk the oid tree, and the only branch
I see is OPENBSD-PF-MIB. Tested on 5.6.
I don't seem to see any output for OPENBSD-BASE-MIB.txt,
OPENBSD-CARP-MIB.t
On 2015/03/27 12:00, Alex Naumov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > On 2015-03-26, Alex Naumov wrote:
> >> # /etc/rc.d/snmpd restart
> >> httpd2 (pid 29518) already running
> >
> > Weird. What are the contents of /etc/rc.d/snmpd?
> >
>
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> # $O
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015-03-26, Alex Naumov wrote:
>> # /etc/rc.d/snmpd restart
>> httpd2 (pid 29518) already running
>
> Weird. What are the contents of /etc/rc.d/snmpd?
>
#!/bin/sh
#
# $OpenBSD: snmpd,v 1.1 2011/07/06 18:55:36 robert Exp $
daemon="/us
On 2015-03-26, Alex Naumov wrote:
> # /etc/rc.d/snmpd restart
> httpd2 (pid 29518) already running
Weird. What are the contents of /etc/rc.d/snmpd?
86
>>
>> # ps aux | grep snmpd
>> root 23284 0.0 0.1 556 980 ?? IsWed04PM0:00.00
>> snmpd: parent (snmpd)
>> _snmpd 28300 0.0 0.1 676 1380 ?? I Wed04PM0:00.55
>> snmpd: snmp engine (snmpd)
>> root 23789 0.0 0.0 592
D name 5.2 GENERIC#278 i386
>
> # ps aux | grep snmpd
> root 23284 0.0 0.1 556 980 ?? IsWed04PM0:00.00
> snmpd: parent (snmpd)
> _snmpd 28300 0.0 0.1 676 1380 ?? I Wed04PM0:00.55
> snmpd: snmp engine (snmpd)
> root 23789 0.0 0.0 592
# /etc/rc.d/snmpd restart
httpd2 (pid 29518) already running
# uname -a
OpenBSD name 5.2 GENERIC#278 i386
# ps aux | grep snmpd
root 23284 0.0 0.1 556 980 ?? IsWed04PM0:00.00
snmpd: parent (snmpd)
_snmpd 28300 0.0 0.1 676 1380 ?? I Wed04PM0:00.55
snmpd: snmp
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:02:30 +0100
Alex Naumov wrote:
> I just want to ask about snmpd(8). As I can see, snmpd don't create
> pid file in /var/run directory.
> Is it correct?
> How to reboot this daemon? There is just sock-file.
It is more reliable to look up the PID from the list of processes
wh
/etc/rc.d/snmpd restart always worked
for me to restart snmpd.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:02:30PM +0100, Alex Naumov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just want to ask about snmpd(8). As I can see, snmpd don't create
> pid file in /var/run directory.
> Is it correct?
> How to reboot this daemon? There is jus
Hello,
I just want to ask about snmpd(8). As I can see, snmpd don't create
pid file in /var/run directory.
Is it correct?
How to reboot this daemon? There is just sock-file.
Thank you,
Alex
Le Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:23:01 +0200,
Patrick Lamaiziere a C)crit :
> Hello,
>
> I've updated my two pf firewalls today from 4.8 to 4.9 (worked fine,
> nice). But it looks there is a problem with net-snmp and the
> traffic reported (IF-MIB). This is not correct anymore (like
Hello,
I've updated my two pf firewalls today from 4.8 to 4.9 (worked fine,
nice). But it looks there is a problem with net-snmp and the
traffic reported (IF-MIB). This is not correct anymore (like 30
Mbits/s instead more than 150 Mbits/s). I've checked the interfaces
indexes in the s
* rh...@hushmail.com [2010-06-30 13:28]:
> When pulling stats off a VLAN interface, do the in/out figures
> reflect the traffic values flowing to/from the attached subnet
they represent the packets/bytes going through that specific
interface, of course.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...
Hi,
Probably a very silly question, but I just need to confirm my
understanding.
When pulling stats off a VLAN interface, do the in/out figures
reflect the traffic values flowing to/from the attached subnet (my
understanding), or do they also include traffic figures flowing
to/from other inte
2010/6/18, Rioux, Christophe :
> Hi
>
> We tried to implemant a monitoring on a OpenBSD 4.4; I get an error message:
> index not found (monitoring via Cacti, means net-snmp). My Cacti server is
> hosted on another server.
So do we, our cacti is 0.8.7e, from some redhat repository
ed while they were maintained; these
releases are likely to be affected by the advisories for more recent
releases.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Rioux, Christophe wrote:
> Hi
>
> We tried to implemant a monitoring on a OpenBSD 4.4; I get an error
message:
> index not found (monito
t 4:31 PM, Rioux, Christophe wrote:
> Hi
>
> We tried to implemant a monitoring on a OpenBSD 4.4; I get an error message:
> index not found (monitoring via Cacti, means net-snmp). My Cacti server is
> hosted on another server.
>
> I check the OID per snmp: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.
Hi
We tried to implemant a monitoring on a OpenBSD 4.4; I get an error message:
index not found (monitoring via Cacti, means net-snmp). My Cacti server is
hosted on another server.
I check the OID per snmp: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1 (this OID search the interface,
and go down to the values)
* In the
silvershadow...@gmx.de wrote:
> the most recent MIBs for OpenBSD is for 4.4 (OpenBSD 4.4:
> obsd-mibs44.tar), which can be downloaded from well-known
>
> http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/snmp/
>
> However, I seem to have problems getting it running on a OpenBSD 4.6
&g
Hi list,
the most recent MIBs for OpenBSD is for 4.4 (OpenBSD 4.4: obsd-mibs44.tar),
which can be downloaded from well-known
http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/snmp/
However, I seem to have problems getting it running on a OpenBSD 4.6 based
relayd setup (dmesg below). It builds okay from
On 17Apr2009 07:48, uno83 wrote:
| Agung T. Apriyanto-2 wrote:
| > i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow
| >
| > r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost
| > .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2
| > IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGE
Hi,
Is there any way to get 64bit interface counters in net-snmp to work with
OpenBSD (preferably via ports)?
>From the official net-snmp 5.4* changelog:
---
Solaris, FreeBSD, OpenBSD:
- Experimental support for 64bit interface counters (ifXTable). Enable
via '--with-mib
> > I know, 4.6 has been out for a while now... However, I run 4.5
> (i386) on a pair of very heavily used load balancers (relayd), and
> due to some customer requirements I would need some statistics
> (traffic, etc).
> >
> > I thought of using Net-SNMP, but a guy in IR
some customer
requirements I would need some statistics (traffic, etc).
I thought of using Net-SNMP, but a guy in IRC told me that in OpenBSD 4.5 it is
broken? I search on the mailing lists, but didn't find mails regarding to this.
However, does anybody know if there's a problem on 4.5? I
On 2009-11-23, Donald Reichert wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I know, 4.6 has been out for a while now... However, I run 4.5
(i386) on a pair of very heavily used load balancers (relayd), and
due to some customer requirements I would need some statistics
(traffic, etc).
>
> I thought of
Hello!
I have net-snmp from ports with mischiefs openbsd mib patch, compiled
and working.
Georg
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 14:37 +0200, Donald Reichert wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I know, 4.6 has been out for a while now... However, I run 4.5 (i386) on a
> pair of very heavily used lo
Hello list,
I know, 4.6 has been out for a while now... However, I run 4.5 (i386) on a pair
of very heavily used load balancers (relayd), and due to some customer
requirements I would need some statistics (traffic, etc).
I thought of using Net-SNMP, but a guy in IRC told me that in OpenBSD 4.5
Agung T. Apriyanto-2 wrote:
>
> i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow
>
> r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2
> IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGER: 1
> IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.6
> If you're just after interface counters, I would recommend using
> snmpd in the base OS instead, net-snmp is rather fragile.
>
>
I was hoping on using net-snmp so I could extended it a bit, but
interface counters is the most important thing right now. Perhaps
when net-snmp g
i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow
r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGER: 1
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.66.1 = INTEGER: 5
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.67.1 = INTEGER: 6
On 2009-03-10, Brian McCann wrote:
> I feel stupid for not being able to figure this out, but I'm hoping
> someone can point out why this doesn't work. I'm trying to get
> net-snmp working on my OpenBSD 4.4 box, and for some reason, it's
> giving me very little in
I feel stupid for not being able to figure this out, but I'm hoping
someone can point out why this doesn't work. I'm trying to get
net-snmp working on my OpenBSD 4.4 box, and for some reason, it's
giving me very little in terms of counters. I'm looking for Ethernet
inter
sd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of
> Brian McCann
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:35 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: SNMP
>
> I feel stupid for not being able to figure this out, but I'm hoping
> someone can point out why this doesn't work. I
Reyk Floeter wrote:
Hi,
the tool is requesting the UCD-SNMP-MIB which is a non-standard
extension of ucd/net-snmp. I'm not convinced to implement any of the
non-standard UCD mibs. Most of the useful values can be exported by
the standards-based HOST-RESOURCES-MIB and I already start
Hi,
the tool is requesting the UCD-SNMP-MIB which is a non-standard
extension of ucd/net-snmp. I'm not convinced to implement any of the
non-standard UCD mibs. Most of the useful values can be exported by
the standards-based HOST-RESOURCES-MIB and I already started on
extendin
Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to configure snmpd in a openbsd 4.3 .
It4s running and i am able to collect some info from openbsd.
I am using zenoss ( www.zenoss.com ) to monitor all my enviroment.
zenoss can only show IpInterface.
At windows servers i had to install snmp
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
