Am 05.07.11 05:13, schrieb Henning Brauer:
* Tito Mari Francis Escaqo [2011-06-29 03:31]:
Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
Apache 1.3 web server?
yes
indeed.
I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the base installation
of the system.
I see
* Nick [2011-06-29 17:41]:
> ouch. We've provided the gun. You are providing the foot. You
> decide what to do with them.
use the right one. donate the left one to me. could use a new ankle
joint.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Servi
* Tito Mari Francis Escaqo [2011-06-29 03:31]:
> Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
> Apache 1.3 web server?
yes
> I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the base installation
> of the system.
I see.
> In case it's not advisable
indeed
> can you
On 2011-06-29, sven falempin wrote:
> This is almost equivalent.
> And that's probably the way I will do it.
>
> But as comp, is separated from base, I'm saying that this minimal_base.tgz
> would be useful.
> Of course, only thinking about the talking around what to put in it, is
> discouraging.
>
On 06/29/2011 08:56 AM, sven falempin wrote:
This is almost equivalent.
And that's probably the way I will do it.
But as comp, is separated from base, I'm saying that this minimal_base.tgz
would be useful.
as is shooting your own foot, in some very special circumstances.
Of course, only thin
I read it once more, cause you say it.
Situation not improved.
2011/6/29 Bret S. Lambert
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:56:38AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> > This is almost equivalent.
> > And that's probably the way I will do it.
> >
> > But as comp, is separated from base, I'm saying that this
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:56:38AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> This is almost equivalent.
> And that's probably the way I will do it.
>
> But as comp, is separated from base, I'm saying that this minimal_base.tgz
> would be useful.
> Of course, only thinking about the talking around what to put
This is almost equivalent.
And that's probably the way I will do it.
But as comp, is separated from base, I'm saying that this minimal_base.tgz
would be useful.
Of course, only thinking about the talking around what to put in it, is
discouraging.
For example , i wouldn't put the package handling
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Fred Crowson wrote:
> On 29 June 2011 09:12, Benny Lofgren wrote:
>> Not to encourage or discourage the OP either way, I don't think you
>> should assume that he's only got one system to play with. After all,
>> it is perfectly feasible to make install builds on o
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:57:30 -0400
sven falempin wrote:
> As i don't want to use a smaller 'spinover'.
> I ll probably will have to list some non usefull files,
> making upgrade more difficult, for my next use of openBSD.
Depending how you upgrade. Making a minimal-base.tgz and not selecting
base
Hello,
Rm is powerfull.
It is possible to solve this quite easily,
But maybe baseXX.tgz is becoming too big,
As i don't want to use a smaller 'spinover'.
I ll probably will have to list some non usefull files,
making upgrade more difficult, for my next use of openBSD.
Best regards.
Sven.
2011/
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:12:17AM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
| On 2011-06-29 09.37, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| > The source of Apache 1.3 in the tree is about 8.5M. The full
| > installation is about 3.7M (on amd64), you've saved 4.8M by not
| > installing the source of Apache. In fact, the full tre
On 29 June 2011 09:12, Benny Lofgren wrote:
> Not to encourage or discourage the OP either way, I don't think you
> should assume that he's only got one system to play with. After all,
> it is perfectly feasible to make install builds on one system and
> installing them on another (or a thousand o
On 2011-06-29 09.37, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> The source of Apache 1.3 in the tree is about 8.5M. The full
> installation is about 3.7M (on amd64), you've saved 4.8M by not
> installing the source of Apache. In fact, the full tree weighs in at
> ~872M (excluding xenocara), so you save almost 870 meg
yep, you're right. it's right there in the man page.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:31:30AM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Esca??o wrote:
| Good day!
| Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
| Apache 1.3 web server? I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the
| base installation of the system. In case it's not advisable
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:46:25PM -0700, Zeb Packard wrote:
> I say go for it.
>
> File is:
> usr.sbin/Makefile
>
> Code is:
> # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.154 2011/02/09 17:17:47 jasper Exp $
>
> .include
>
> SUBDIR= ac accton acpidump adduser amd apm apmd arp \
> authpf bgpctl b
I say go for it.
File is:
usr.sbin/Makefile
Code is:
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.154 2011/02/09 17:17:47 jasper Exp $
.include
SUBDIR= ac accton acpidump adduser amd apm apmd arp \
authpf bgpctl bgpd bind chroot config cron crunchgen dev_mkdb \
dhcpd dhcrelay dvmrpctl dvmrpd
see SKIPDIR in mk.conf(5)
add usr.sbin/httpd
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Tito Mari Francis EscaC1o
wrote:
> Good day!
> Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
> Apache 1.3 web server? I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the
> base installation of
Dude don't hate on my amiga!
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:42:27PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On 06/28/11 21:31, Tito Mari Francis Escaqo wrote:
> >Good day!
> >Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
> >Apache 1.3 web server? I was hoping to save a few more megaby
> On 06/28/11 21:31, Tito Mari Francis Escaqo wrote:
> > Good day!
> > Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
> > Apache 1.3 web server? I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the
> > base installation of the system. In case it's not advisable, can you plea
> Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
> Apache 1.3 web server? I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the
> base installation of the system. In case it's not advisable, can you please
> discuss the bad side effects of doing so?
> Thanks in advance.
You
On 06/28/11 21:31, Tito Mari Francis Escaqo wrote:
Good day!
Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
Apache 1.3 web server? I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the
base installation of the system. In case it's not advisable, can you please
discuss the b
Good day!
Is it possible to recompile the whole system while excluding the built-in
Apache 1.3 web server? I was hoping to save a few more megabytes off the
base installation of the system. In case it's not advisable, can you please
discuss the bad side effects of doing so?
Thanks in advance.
24 matches
Mail list logo
