-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So the resolution to this, barring some intermittent disk strangeness, is
that I had a SATA cable with crap connex. No surprise. Silver stays
shiny about 3 hours here.
Dhu
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:19:40 -0700
Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:06:57 -0500
Nick Holland wrote:
> On 1/12/21 9:41 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> >
> > Howdy all? I'm wondering if more than one RAID1 array is supported in 6.7++
> >
> > I'm having problems that could be bios limitat
On 1/12/21 9:41 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
Howdy all? I'm wondering if more than one RAID1 array is supported in 6.7++
I'm having problems that could be bios limitations, OS, or a bad SATA (Pwr?)
cable.
Currently I'm going with the latter and rebuilding the RAID (again) but was
just
Le 30/04/2018 à 04:14, Nick Holland a écrit :
Did you disable the RAID functionality of this card? If not, the BIOS
probably tried to "rebuild" one disk onto the other, causing you all
kinds of pain. softraid has to do everything for this to work properly.
Nick.
Hi,
I will check that but
On 04/29/18 20:23, Mimoza wrote:
>
>
> Le 30/04/2018 à 00:01, Mimoza a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> I have a problem to create a second RAID 1 on my router an Soekris
>> 6501-70 (http://www.soekris.com/products/net6501-1.html)
> […]
>> I can rebuild the offline device but he still offline …
>>
>>
Le 30/04/2018 à 00:01, Mimoza a écrit :
Hi,
I have a problem to create a second RAID 1 on my router an Soekris
6501-70 (http://www.soekris.com/products/net6501-1.html)
[…]
I can rebuild the offline device but he still offline …
So, there any option or configuration to explain/solve that ?
Le 26/04/2018 à 14:13, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
I don't know if is important but the faulty HDD have some bad sector.
Oh, if you have bad sectors showing up then you should definitely replace
it and not use it.
You are right … i'll looking for a new HDD.
On 2018-04-26, MImoza wrote:
>
> Hi Stuart,
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Well i downloaded the 6.2 kernel here :
> https://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/OpenBSD/6.2/i386/
>
> renamed it as bsd_62, copy in / and boot with the following commande :
> > boot bsd_62
>
> And nothing change …
>
> softraid0 at root
Le 26/04/2018 à 09:40, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
On 2018-04-25, MImoza wrote:
I have swapped out hardware (cable, HDD, port), re-created the RAID from
scratch, but at each time the Thosiba HDD is offline at reboot.
I don't think it's hardware incompatibility because with 6.2 everything
was O
On 2018-04-25, MImoza wrote:
> I have swapped out hardware (cable, HDD, port), re-created the RAID from
> scratch, but at each time the Thosiba HDD is offline at reboot.
> I don't think it's hardware incompatibility because with 6.2 everything
> was Ok.
> I think it's software, because the rebui
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:38:52AM -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> Does OBSD 6.2 support DELL H840 and DELL H740p raid controllers ?
No, but 6.3 will.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:41:22 -0300
"x9p" wrote:
> > On 2017-09-20, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> >> My question is:
> >>
> >> I would like to use hardware raid disks with disk encryption. Is that
> >> possible ? Since the disk raid appears transparently to the OS.
> >>
> >> Is that possible ?
> >
> On 2017-09-20, Friedrich Locke wrote:
>> My question is:
>>
>> I would like to use hardware raid disks with disk encryption. Is that
>> possible ? Since the disk raid appears transparently to the OS.
>>
>> Is that possible ?
>
> Yes.
>
>
Not with 6.1, right?
installboot: invalid boot record sig
On 2017-09-20, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> My question is:
>
> I would like to use hardware raid disks with disk encryption. Is that
> possible ? Since the disk raid appears transparently to the OS.
>
> Is that possible ?
Yes.
On 2014-03-17, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Good afternoon folks.
>
> I wonder if OBSD supports DELL RAID controller like H710/H310/etc.
> I am using OBSD 5.4.
>
> []s gustavo.
>
>
SAS5/PERC5/SAS6/PERC6/H200/H310/H700/H800/H710P: yes.
S100/S300 "winraid": no.
On 13-10-27 03:49 PM, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
This is definitelly a thread which I followed with great interest. In
the light of Stefan's diff I have three questions.
1. Does that make
http://blog.cochard.me/2012/03/openbsd-51-installation-on-sofraid4.html
accurate? That would mean that I can
2013/10/27 Predrag Punosevac
>
> 3. Are there any strong opinions on CARP/pfsync vs RAID 1/altroot for
> firewall redundancy for small office use.
>
>
> I really don't see how those two options would be pitted against each
other.
Most of the time I don't see the firewall rules as super secrets,
Stefan Sperling wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
>> I recently followed the most up-to-date guidance I could find on booting
>> OpenBSD off softraid(4), and *everything* I found showed that I needed
>> the kernel on a separate slice so boot(8) could find it.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> I recently followed the most up-to-date guidance I could find on booting
> OpenBSD off softraid(4), and *everything* I found showed that I needed
> the kernel on a separate slice so boot(8) could find it.
>
> For that matter, boot(
On 2013-10-26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> (And, if it does work this way with RAID 1, when did that start happening?)
>
> In 2011 as per log of /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/installboot/installboot.c.
IIRC, this is just for a few arch at the moment, possibly just i386/amd64?
> I know OpenBSD borrows useful concepts from Linux from time to
> time, but not keeping the manpages up to date isn't a "feature" I'd like
> to see brought over to the BSD world. One of the fundamentals of OpenBSD
> has historically been correct documentation.
It's true.
The previously posted
On 13-10-26 09:43 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> Does it also function that way with RAID 1 softraid volumes?
> Yes.
That's great news! (I re-did a system with root-on-raid1 moments ago
and lo - it "just works".)
But...
Even greater news would be if anyone other than a couple of developers
knew
2013/10/26 Stefan Sperling :
> In 2011 as per log of /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/installboot/installboot.c.
>
> revision 1.56
> date: 2011/01/23 14:57:08; author: jsing; state: Exp; lines: +258 -34;
> Add support to installboot(8) for installing biosboot(8)
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:15:36AM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> On 13-10-25 01:29 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >With crypto softraid: installboot copies /boot into a reserved
> >area at the beginning of the softraid partition. In this case, the
> >/boot file isn't used during booting. Then it copies b
On 13-10-25 01:29 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
With crypto softraid: installboot copies /boot into a reserved area at
the beginning of the softraid partition. In this case, the /boot file
isn't used during booting. Then it copies biosboot into place, with
the block array filled in with the locations
2013/10/25 Ted Unangst :
> With crypto softraid:
> installboot copies /boot into a reserved area at the beginning of the
> softraid partition. In this case, the /boot file isn't used during
> booting. Then it copies biosboot into place, with the block array
> filled in with the locations of the cop
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 19:40, Daniel Aurelio Galeazzo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After ~1 year of OpenBSD without need your help (FAQ and man
> are very complete) I've a question. I need to dual boot my HD
> for Linux Distro (I need Android SDK and I red can't use it into BSD)
> but I installed full cr
On 07/07/11 18:02, Zeb Packard wrote:
> hmmkay, so both disklabels have an sd0b, softraid is pointed to
> sd3b for swap, but dmesg still prints 'swap on sd0b dump on sd0b'
> I'm assuming this is because sd0b is striped?
no, it is because sd0b is swap BY DEFINITION.
Do not use the 'a' partition of
hmmkay, so both disklabels have an sd0b, softraid is pointed to
sd3b for swap, but dmesg still prints 'swap on sd0b dump on sd0b'
I'm assuming this is because sd0b is striped?
I figure it's worth a shot on my test system, if it's quicker, I'm not
opposed to the little bit of configuration up front
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011, Zeb Packard wrote:
> So, i've setup a file server with softraid rather than the older
> raidframe, however on the new system I tried setting my sd*b
> partitions to a raid 0 configuration so the swap space runs a
> little faster. After getting the swap space setup, though dmes
On 06/28/11 21:53, Zeb Packard wrote:
>> Overwriting file in /etc could cause all sorts of problems, rc
>> scripts corrupted could leave you in single user mode for example.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Nigel Taylor
>>
>
> Thanks a bunch for the tips and encouragement. I was using the
> tutorial at
On 2011-06-28 22.53, Zeb Packard wrote:
>> Overwriting file in /etc could cause all sorts of problems, rc scripts
>> corrupted could leave you in single user mode for example.
> Thanks a bunch for the tips and encouragement.
> I was using the tutorial at http://www.argon18.com/raid_openbsd.html
> T
> Overwriting file in /etc could cause all sorts of problems, rc scripts
> corrupted could leave you in single user mode for example.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Nigel Taylor
>
Thanks a bunch for the tips and encouragement.
I was using the tutorial at http://www.argon18.com/raid_openbsd.html
This tutorial w
On 06/28/11 01:36, Zeb Packard wrote:
> Hello all, I'm new so if I do anything rude please let me know so I can
> adjust.
>
> I set up an openbsd file server using sftp, with a raid 1
> configuration and failover with Carp. My plan was to use rsync to sync
> up the file sharing directories and I
On 2011-06-19 21.50, Eric Furman wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:04 +, "Kevin Chadwick"
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:41:40 -0700
>> Tyler Morgan wrote:
>>> I decided, for my fairly basic router needs, to not use RAID in OpenBSD
>>> and instead rely on CARP and backups. I am more worried about the
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:04 +, "Kevin Chadwick"
wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:41:40 -0700
> Tyler Morgan wrote:
>
> > I decided, for my fairly basic router needs, to not use RAID in OpenBSD
> > and instead rely on CARP and backups. I am more worried about the power
> > supply and the mother
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:41:40 -0700
Tyler Morgan wrote:
> I decided, for my fairly basic router needs, to not use RAID in OpenBSD
> and instead rely on CARP and backups. I am more worried about the power
> supply and the motherboard going wonky before the SSD.
CARP is obviously better but being
On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:03 PM, na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>
>> You will not be happy with reliability of SSD
>>
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-hot-crazy-solid-state-drive-scal
>> e.html
>
> After lots and lots of useless blather, the first i
On 6/17/2011 10:03 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
You will not be happy with reliability of SSD
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-hot-crazy-solid-state-drive-scal
e.html
After lots and lots of useless blather, the first interesting tidbit
shows up in a comment
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> You will not be happy with reliability of SSD
> http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-hot-crazy-solid-state-drive-scal
> e.html
After lots and lots of useless blather, the first interesting tidbit
shows up in a comment more than halfway down the page:
| Over at blek
On 2011-06-17, Donald Reichert wrote:
> I'm preparing a pair of new servers, each equipped with a bunch of
> NICs in order to replace some Cisco gear doing BGP and friends.
>
> What puzzles me right now is how to configure the stuff HD-wise. I
> have two SSDs in each of the machines, my initial pl
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Donald Reichert
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm preparing a pair of new servers, each equipped with a bunch of NICs in
order to replace some Cisco gear doing BGP and friends.
>
> What puzzles me right now is how to configure the stuff HD-wise. I have two
SSDs in each of
Hi,
Can we add, remove or change the chunks hard drives, rebuild, without
re-constructing the RAID ?
Regards
2010/10/7 Jean-Francois
> Hi,
>
> Doing tests, I could not always do properly the kick off of a rebuild.
> What is exactly the procedure for doing a rebuild with bioctl -R ?
>
> In part
Hi,
Doing tests, I could not always do properly the kick off of a rebuild.
What is exactly the procedure for doing a rebuild with bioctl -R ?
In particular I don't understand, when you have say a build with chunks sd0a
and sd1a, then remove one chunk, plug a new one, if it doe'nt appear as sd1
* Jean-Francois [2010-10-07 19:44]:
> Why raidctl and bioctl ? What differences, why both are here ?
raidframe and thus raidctl will eventually go. softraid is the future.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mai
Le Thursday 07 October 2010 13:22:01, g.du...@otasc.org a icrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is soft RAID currently a work in progress, I remember some important
> > features
> > were still added release after release recently. Will it be the case for
> > forthcoming 4.8 ?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Jean-Fran
> Hello,
>
> Is soft RAID currently a work in progress, I remember some important
> features
> were still added release after release recently. Will it be the case for
> forthcoming 4.8 ?
>
> Regards
>
> Jean-Frangois
>
>
Hi,
is already working I guess :
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query
On Mon, 18 May 2009 05:04:24 -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
>Hard words, Theo. Do you think anyone you talked to
>could actually understand what you were sayin'?
>
Dumb words, Dhu. Do you think anyone who reads this will think you
could understand what you were meaning if you did not rea
Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:40:44 -0600 (MDT)
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> >
> > If any of the people we talked to at 3ware weren't such
> > LYING BAGS OF HYPOCRITICAL SHIT we'd support their hardware
>
> Hard words, Theo. Do you think anyone you talked to
> could a
On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:40:44 -0600 (MDT)
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >On Fri, 15 May 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
> >
> >> I'm currently trying to verify something, because while I know makefiles
> >> really
> >> well, the ones for the FreeBSD kernel are too indirect for me, so I can't
> >> yet
> >> ver
>On Fri, 15 May 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> I'm currently trying to verify something, because while I know makefiles
>> really
>> well, the ones for the FreeBSD kernel are too indirect for me, so I can't yet
>> verify about the twa driver.
>>
>Doesn't make any difference, 3Ware was abandoned by
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I'm currently trying to verify something, because while I know makefiles
> really
> well, the ones for the FreeBSD kernel are too indirect for me, so I can't yet
> verify about the twa driver.
>
Doesn't make any difference, 3Ware was abandoned by the proj
L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> OK ... but you could tone it down just a touch ...
>>
> You might want to monitor the list a while, .. OpenBSD is build by
> developers, for developers. Us'n Users get to enjoy the fruits of their
> labors and contribute when we c
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Chuck Robey wrote:
> OK ... but you could tone it down just a touch ...
>
You might want to monitor the list a while, .. OpenBSD is build by
developers, for developers. Us'n Users get to enjoy the fruits of their
labors and contribute when we can.
The reply was entirely appro
System Administrator wrote:
>
> Unlike FreeBSD, this project (OpenBSD) does not support or incorporate
> drivers based around binary-blobs. Furthermore, with rare exceptions,
> the project does not reverse-engineer but insists on having complete
> documentation to do proper development. Back in
On 15 May 2009 at 17:11, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I'm trying to see if there's any way I can get my Raid controller, which is a
> AMCC (3Ware) 9650-4, to work under OpenBSD. The man page for the twe driver
> says it works for several different 3Ware controllers, but it seems to omit
> the
> 9000 con
Hi Chris,
Maybe the Intel Q35 Chipset is not the (only) component which troubles
your system, it could be for example the disks (which are not fully
compatible with your motherboard). A best pratice is to consult the
Hardware Compatibility List of your motherboard (if available) before
assembling
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
As far as I know I fixed the hot-spare thing on ami. If that is not
the
case let me know.
I booted into the card's BIOS and confirmed that the drive was marked
as hot spare. It seems to have worked, and this is on 4.1 as well.
No Gaby, if you made
On 18 Jun 2008, at 16:51, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> As far as I know I fixed the hot-spare thing on ami. If that is not
> the
> case let me know.
I booted into the card's BIOS and confirmed that the drive was marked
as hot spare. It seems to have worked, and this is on 4.1 as well.
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is the device you expect to provide disks, the only obvious
> candidate I see, it is not currently supported in the RAMDISK_CD
> kernel if at all.
>From a quick glance at pciide(4), I suppose it should work
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
As far as I know I fixed the hot-spare thing on ami. If that is not the
case let me know.
Cool :). I don't have a way of testing it at the moment. When I am
able I will let you know.
Did the fix go into current, or did it make 4.3? [I've taken
LSI tech support is very helpful. 800-633-4545 in the usofa. Or:
http://www.lsi.com/support/support_form.html
Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
We had a drive failure on a RAID5 (LSI MegaRaid SATA 150-4) volume in
our server (OpenBSD 4.1/x86). The hot spare kicked in and the volume
rebuilt fine after a suc
As far as I know I fixed the hot-spare thing on ami. If that is not the
case let me know.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:29:23PM -0600, Matthew Mulrooney wrote:
> Gaby, please be aware of this thread:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=120349790515559
>
> AFAIK the LSI/bioctl hot spare issue st
Gaby, please be aware of this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=120349790515559
AFAIK the LSI/bioctl hot spare issue still exists. If you have created
your hot spare using bioctl -H, it *will* look like a hot spare, but it
probably will *not* act like one.
You might want to give
It is ok within margin. All 250GB drives should be 250GB "enough".
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:13:54PM -0400, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
> We had a drive failure on a RAID5 (LSI MegaRaid SATA 150-4) volume in our
> server (OpenBSD 4.1/x86). The hot spare kicked in and the volume rebuilt
> fine after
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:13:47PM -0400, Paul Barbeau wrote:
> > Please send the dmesg from the boot disk/cd.
>
> Here is the dmesg from the boot.
There are no wd* or sd* devices listed here so there are no disks
available to the system.
> "Intel 6321ESB RAID" rev 0x09 at pci0 dev 31 function
> Please send the dmesg from the boot disk/cd.
Here is the dmesg from the boot.
OpenBSD 4.3 (RAMDISK_CD) #645: Wed Mar 12 11:31:03 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 3
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-
Paul Barbeau wrote:
However when I try to install it says "no disks found" when I try "fdisk-u
hd0" it does not work as well. Any ideas or am I out of luck to get openBSD
into this configuration?
Please send the dmesg from the boot disk/cd. Also, you may want to try
a snapshot, as support f
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
I'm looking to set up a test unit this summer to try RAID 1+0 or 3+0.
The goal is to be able to stream data quickly but tolerate loss of at
least one disk at a time.
It looks like there are three options supporting at least RAID level 0
and 1, can/should any of these be stack
> It looks like one disk (or CF) is needed for a base OpenBSD system, and
> the other 4+ for RAID. Is that the best way to ensure unattended booting?
I can only speak of raidframe as its the only one I've used.
If you mean for attaching the array automatically then as mentioned in the
manpage mak
Martin Toft wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:49:01AM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Hi all,
I need a RAID-1 (mirroring) for production environment.
?Should I use RAIDFrame or softraid?
The reliability is the main request feature.
AFAIK, not all features of softraid are finished yet. Ho
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:49:01AM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need a RAID-1 (mirroring) for production environment.
>
> ?Should I use RAIDFrame or softraid?
>
> The reliability is the main request feature.
AFAIK, not all features of softraid are finished yet. However, it
mfi(4) ami(4)
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:26:26PM -0800, Jon wrote:
> I'm about to send an OpenBSD server to a datacenter for a client and we
> need RAID in case a hard disk fails. I need answers from people who have
> real world hands-on experience and can tell me what to use so that, if a
> dr
On 3/8/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Siju George" writes:
> On 3/8/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So this is still not the output I'd expect what does 'disklabel wd0'
> > and 'disklabel wd1' say? Are wd0d and wd1d of type FS_RAID ??
> >
>
> nope :-(
> So that
"Siju George" writes:
> On 3/8/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > Kernelized RAIDframe activated
> > > Searching for raid components...
> > > dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
> > > dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
> > > root on wd0a
> > > rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 raw
On 3/8/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Kernelized RAIDframe activated
> Searching for raid components...
> dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
> dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
> root on wd0a
> rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
> RAIDFRAME: protectedSectors is 64.
> r
"Siju George" writes:
> On 3/8/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Siju George" writes:
> > > In my dmesg at one point it says
> > >
> > > ==
> > > Kernelized RAIDframe activated
> > > dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
> > > dkcsum: wd1 match
On 3/8/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Siju George" writes:
> In my dmesg at one point it says
>
> ==
> Kernelized RAIDframe activated
> dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
> dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
> root on wd0a
> ==
"Siju George" writes:
> On 3/6/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Siju George" writes:
> >
> > It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than
> > you really wanted to know :)
> >
> > Later...
> >
>
> Greg,
>
> Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask y
"Siju George" writes:
> On 3/6/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Siju George" writes:
> >
> > It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than
> > you really wanted to know :)
> >
> > Later...
> >
>
> Greg,
>
> Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask y
On 3/6/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Siju George" writes:
It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than
you really wanted to know :)
Later...
Greg,
Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask you one more thing :-)
In my dmesg at one point it say
On 3/6/07, Greg Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Siju George" writes:
> Is the Raid not working properly?
It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than
you really wanted to know :)
Thanks a million Greg :-)
I really appreciate your Detailed reply :-))
Kind Regards
"Siju George" writes:
> Hi,
>
> The dmesg Output Shows
>
> Clean: Yes
>
> for both Raid Components as shown below
>
>
>
> raid0: Component /dev/wd0d being configured at row: 0 col: 0
> Row: 0 Column: 0 Num Rows: 1 Num Column
On 1/7/07, Tautvydas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Marc,
> An /etc/fstab on one of my machines...
>
> # devicemount point type optionsbackup fsck pass
> /dev/wd0a / ffsrw 1 1
> /dev/wd0d /varffsrw,nodev,nosuid
Hi, Marc,
An /etc/fstab on one of my machines...
# devicemount point type optionsbackup fsck pass
/dev/wd0a / ffsrw 1 1
/dev/wd0d /varffsrw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
/dev/wd0h /var/wwwffsrw,nodev,nosui
> So, question is - how is it possible? It looks like something I'm
> missing. I don't know how, but it looks like all www date is written
Order is important. It looks like you mounted /var/www before /var
in which case /var/www is hidden. /etc/fstab must be in the order
that you want filesyst
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 06:33:48AM -0800, David Newman wrote:
> OpenBSD 4.0 on UltraSparc II, two 18G SCSI drives
>
> I am trying to set up software RAID disk mirroring. There are many fine
> howtos out there, including:
>
> http://www.monkey.org/openbsd/archive/misc/0203/msg00803.html
> http://w
On 9/8/06, Kaven Gagnon (ml) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I would like to know if these three SCSI controllers are compatible
with OpenBSD? (No mention about these cards on the manifacturer Web site
and OpenBSD compatibility list.)
All of these cards are listed on the i386 hardware page.
htt
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 02:11:12AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> > MegaRAID SCSI 320-0 (520-0 CH)
>
> See ami(4) - in fact, they come highly recommended, though I believe
> mfi(4) is the new ami(4) - see
> http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20060519044541, and note
> the 'dearly
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:51:48PM -0400, Kaven Gagnon (ml) wrote:
> Hi, I would like to know if these three SCSI controllers are compatible
> with OpenBSD? (No mention about these cards on the manifacturer Web site
> and OpenBSD compatibility list.)
>
> Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
> Adaptec SCSI RAI
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 03:26:24PM +0200, Simon Vallet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just in the process of upgrading to 3.9 from a root-on-RAID 3.8
> -stable install. I fetched the sources from the CD, built a
> RAID-enabled kernel, and rebooted : the kernel hangs after issuing
> "Kernelized RAIDframe act
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:09:03 +0200
Mitja Mu>enih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I even tried to replicate the problem locally on supposedly same
> hardware (HP Compaq dc5100 + 2x SATA HDDs) but here I couldn't get it
> to hang on raidframe. I did manage to consistently hang it by
> enabling the front
As you referenced my post - I never solved that. It was just too painful to
seriously debug it over a rented KVM from half the world away and requiring
me to open a trouble ticket for every reboot. I even tried to replicate the
problem locally on supposedly same hardware (HP Compaq dc5100 + 2x SATA
On 5/20/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>...
>Kernelized RAIDFrame activated
>dkcsum wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
>dkcsum wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
>root on wd1a
>rootdev=0x10 rrootdev=0x320 rawdev=0x312
>warning: /dev/console does not exist
>ini
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:39:57AM +0200, ip wrote:
> On 5/14/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >While wd1a does have a kernel, it does not have a proper root filesystem
> >- for instance, no /dev directory, or more specifically no /dev/console.
> >
> >Fix this, and also have
On 5/14/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While wd1a does have a kernel, it does not have a proper root filesystem
- for instance, no /dev directory, or more specifically no /dev/console.
Fix this, and also have a look at daily(8) which documents the altroot
mechanism, which is q
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:38:40PM +0200, ip wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
> I spent two days to read man and how-tos, but today I don't succeed
> again to make raid 1 to work.
> I want to install openbsd 3.9 on two ide disks (wd0,wd1) of 10 gb with
> raidframe raid 1.
> Following the main steps that I h
Thanks Otto!
This fixed the problem...
Xavier
--
There are only 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand binary and those who don't.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Xavier Mertens wrote:
>
> > 16 partitions:
> > # sizeoffset fst
Xavier Mertens writes:
> Well, I already tried to create only a small partition:
[snip]
> > p
> device: /dev/rraid0c
> type: RAID
> disk: raid
> label: fictitious
> bytes/sector: 512
> sectors/track: 128
> tracks/cylinder: 8
> sectors/cylinder: 1024
> cylinders: 156417
> total sectors: 160171392
>
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Xavier Mertens wrote:
> 16 partitions:
> # sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
> a: 4358414031416925149 unused 0 0 # Cyl
> 1383715*-1809342*
> c: 160171392 0 unused 0 0 # Cyl 0
> -156417*
>
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
