On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:51:26AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>if you're feeling brave you can try the diff i sent to the 'PPPoE
>passthrough with "GigaHub" is very slow' thread on misc@ a week or so
>ago which skips the queue for pppoe data packets.
It took a while, but yesterday I installed a sn
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:17:23PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:48:41PM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:40:20AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 19 Dec 2024, at 08:20, David Gwynne wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 19 Dec 2024, at 02:17, Maurice
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:48:41PM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:40:20AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> >> On 19 Dec 2024, at 08:20, David Gwynne wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 19 Dec 2024, at 02:17, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> >>> kstat(1) shows me that there are (nearly) no e
On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 08:18:29PM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>On 19/12/2024 23:53, Maurice Janssen wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>> > On 18/12/2024 18:22, Maurice Janssen wrote:
>> > > I moved the rules for the NTP traffic to the top and this
On 19/12/2024 23:53, Maurice Janssen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 18/12/2024 18:22, Maurice Janssen wrote:
I moved the rules for the NTP traffic to the top and this seems to improve
things. But I'll leave it overnight to have some better stats
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>On 18/12/2024 18:22, Maurice Janssen wrote:
>> I moved the rules for the NTP traffic to the top and this seems to improve
>> things. But I'll leave it overnight to have some better stats in the
>> morning.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:40:20AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>> On 19 Dec 2024, at 08:20, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Dec 2024, at 02:17, Maurice Janssen wrote:
>>> kstat(1) shows me that there are (nearly) no errors on the rx side, but
>>> showed about 470k dropped packets (qdrops) on t
On 18/12/2024 18:22, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> I moved the rules for the NTP traffic to the top and this seems to improve
> things. But I'll leave it overnight to have some better stats in the
> morning.
>
> Best regards,
> Maurice
Jumping in since I've also recently added an ntp server in ntppool
> On 19 Dec 2024, at 08:20, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 19 Dec 2024, at 02:17, Maurice Janssen wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:51:26AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> Hey Maurice,
>>>
>>> bluhm@ just did a talk at eurobsdcon that might help you understand the
>>> different poin
> On 19 Dec 2024, at 02:17, Maurice Janssen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:51:26AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>> Hey Maurice,
>>
>> bluhm@ just did a talk at eurobsdcon that might help you understand the
>> different points to look at. my tldr version is if packets are being
>> dropped
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:21:44AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2024-12-18, Janne Johansson wrote:
>>> I have an NTP server behind an OpenBSD firewall / router and seeing some
>>> packet loss. The NTP server (Leontp 1200) should be able to handle the
>>> load easily, so I suspect the packet
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:51:26AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>Hey Maurice,
>
>bluhm@ just did a talk at eurobsdcon that might help you understand the
>different points to look at. my tldr version is if packets are being
>dropped on the firewall it will be somewhere in the receive path. my
>experie
On 2024-12-18, Janne Johansson wrote:
>> I have an NTP server behind an OpenBSD firewall / router and seeing some
>> packet loss. The NTP server (Leontp 1200) should be able to handle the
>> load easily, so I suspect the packet loss occurs at the firewall/router
>> or elsewhere.
>> My first suspe
> I have an NTP server behind an OpenBSD firewall / router and seeing some
> packet loss. The NTP server (Leontp 1200) should be able to handle the
> load easily, so I suspect the packet loss occurs at the firewall/router
> or elsewhere.
> My first suspect was the state table on the firewall/route
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:31:36PM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an NTP server behind an OpenBSD firewall / router and seeing some
> packet loss.?? The NTP server (Leontp 1200) should be able to handle the
> load easily, so I suspect the packet loss occurs at the firewall/router o
15 matches
Mail list logo
