On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:48:41PM +0100, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:40:20AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> >> On 19 Dec 2024, at 08:20, David Gwynne <da...@gwynne.id.au> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On 19 Dec 2024, at 02:17, Maurice Janssen <maur...@z74.net> wrote:
> >>> kstat(1) shows me that there are (nearly) no errors on the rx side, but
> >>> showed about 470k dropped packets (qdrops) on the tx side for igc2.
> >> 
> >> wait, what?
> >
> >do you see oactives going up too?
> 
> The oactives counters for igc2:0:txq:[0-3] are > 0, but didn't increase
> during the last 12 hours.  Same for the qdrops.
> But at this moment I'm getting about 1200 NTP requests per second, as I
> lowered the bandwith setting in the pool a bit (to avoid getting removed
> from the pool).  At the moment, there seem to be no or very little packet
> loss.
> I will increase the setting temporarily and see what happens with the
> counters.
> 
> Part of the kstat output:
> igc2:0:txq:0
>          packets: 1225749955 packets
>            bytes: 122334582656 bytes
>           qdrops: 140005 packets
>           errors: 0 packets
>             qlen: 0 packets
>          maxqlen: 1023 packets
>          oactive: false
>         oactives: 9433
> igc2:0:txq:1
>          packets: 797916877 packets
>            bytes: 80690434981 bytes
>           qdrops: 88268 packets
>           errors: 0 packets
>             qlen: 0 packets
>          maxqlen: 1023 packets
>          oactive: false
>         oactives: 10854
> igc2:0:txq:2
>          packets: 800092190 packets
>            bytes: 80927529361 bytes
>           qdrops: 29505 packets
>           errors: 0 packets
>             qlen: 0 packets
>          maxqlen: 1023 packets
>          oactive: false
>         oactives: 7364
> igc2:0:txq:3
>          packets: 802568095 packets
>            bytes: 81134090003 bytes
>           qdrops: 216840 packets
>           errors: 0 packets
>             qlen: 0 packets
>          maxqlen: 1023 packets
>          oactive: false
>         oactives: 15490
> 
> >> do you have PCIe ASPM enabled in the bios?
> 
> No idea, I can check this tomorrow morning.

did you check this?

i'm sure i've seen chatter about aspm and pci power management causing
problems with intel 2.5g nics.

Reply via email to