Re: mbuf KPI

2009-08-03 Thread Theo de Raadt
> I want to manipulate and inject packets from kernel space. Not via bpf > and userland. > I want to load up an LKM and don't patch all over the src. Ah, that is what you want. In that case I can tell you that you are not going to get it from us. Sorry.

Re: mbuf KPI

2009-08-01 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Thank you for the answer, Bret. Best regards Maxim Bourmistrov mailto: maxim.bourmist...@unixconn.com tfn.: +46735461332 On 1 aug 2009, at 10.35, Bret S. Lambert wrote: On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 10:23:55AM +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: Actually, I know what I'm asking for. I want to manip

Re: mbuf KPI

2009-08-01 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 10:23:55AM +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > Actually, I know what I'm asking for. > I want to manipulate and inject packets from kernel space. Not via > bpf and userland. Congrats; you can do that already. > I want to load up an LKM and don't patch all over the src. Then

Re: mbuf KPI

2009-08-01 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Actually, I know what I'm asking for. I want to manipulate and inject packets from kernel space. Not via bpf and userland. I want to load up an LKM and don't patch all over the src. Last I checked, OpenBSD lacked what I needed(OSX does not), so this is why I'm asking. I'm asking a clear int

Re: mbuf KPI

2009-07-31 Thread Chris Cappuccio
So, what are you asking for? For OpenBSD to adopt the Mac OS X mbuf interface (or "KPI")? What is the deficiency in the OpenBSD mbuf interface that you see? What function do you need? For what application? Most of the Mac OS X "mbuf KPI" is the same as the OpenBSD mbuf interface, just with di