Actually, I know what I'm asking for.
I want to manipulate and inject packets from kernel space. Not via bpf
and userland.
I want to load up an LKM and don't patch all over the src.
Last I checked, OpenBSD lacked what I needed(OSX does not), so this is
why I'm asking.
I'm asking a clear interface to work with.
> But I suspect you don't even know what you're asking for.
Don't ever talk to me like that, before you done your research.
//maxim
On 31 jul 2009, at 23.10, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
So, what are you asking for?
For OpenBSD to adopt the Mac OS X mbuf interface (or "KPI")?
What is the deficiency in the OpenBSD mbuf interface that you see?
What function do you need? For what application?
Most of the Mac OS X "mbuf KPI" is the same as the OpenBSD mbuf
interface, just with different function names. In some cases there
are new functions that OpenBSD doesn't have, and handles
differently. But I suspect you don't even know what you're asking
for.
Maxim Bourmistrov [maxim.bourmist...@unixconn.com] wrote:
Hello,
Is <subject> something "nice to have"/on TODO-list?
If not, what are the reasons for not having it?
//maxim
--
Trying to bring taste and skill into a branch of artistic endeavor
which had sunk to the lowest possible depths.
