I have a mail of someone who is actively fought by the henchmen of
No. 43!
Theo de Raadt wrote [2011-11-07 18:52+0100]:
> > Even if there would have been a note that the project itself has
> > chosen to use cvs(1) and that git clones are unofficial.
>
> wow, that's backwards.
History is very imp
Philip Guenther wrote [2011-11-07 19:03+0100]:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
> wrote:
> ...
> > That is to say, to end this lengthy thing, i would have
> > appreciated it if i would have found some URL to a trusted git
> > clone on the official OpenBSD homepage at that t
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
wrote:
...
> That is to say, to end this lengthy thing, i would have
> appreciated it if i would have found some URL to a trusted git
> clone on the official OpenBSD homepage at that time.
> Even if there would have been a note that the projec
> Even if there would have been a note that the project itself has
> chosen to use cvs(1) and that git clones are unofficial.
wow, that's backwards.
if anything is official, we mention it.
if anything is not unofficial, we don't mention it.
Stuart Henderson wrote [2011-11-07 9:47:53+0100]:
> the three public cvs->git imports of OpenBSD are separate efforts
I desperately searched for some OpenBSD git(1) repository and
couldn't find one, but remembered one post of yours and so
i ended up at anoncvs.estpak.ee, having no problem ever sin
On 2011-11-04, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso wrote:
> But it turns out that the two repos only have three heads in common:
> BOOTBLOCKS, BRIAN and graichen (from the 19-hundreds).
the three public cvs->git imports of OpenBSD are separate efforts
(and at least the github one is done with a different conv
Hi all,
i still have some doubts about that github thing.
Or, to be more exactly, i just don't know.
But it turns out that the two repos only have three heads in common:
BOOTBLOCKS, BRIAN and graichen (from the 19-hundreds).
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Brett wrote:
> > Later on I guess I
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:42:55AM +0100, Kristaps Dzonsons wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> (ducks)
>
_ _ _ _ _
>('), >('), >('), >('), >(') ___,
(` =~~/(` =~~/(` =~~/(` =~~/(` =~~/
jgs ~^~^`---'~^~^~^`---'~^
That said, i don't think having individual developers provide
plus.html entries in addition to commit messages would work -
additional workload, lack of uniform style, and lack of a "big
picture" pespective. So it has to be done by one person, or by
a small team. The ideal person to do it would
> > >> > I've worked with Janne and some stuff are almost but not yet
> > >> > published (to week
> > >> > #26, the beginning of c2k11 for 5.0, and week #33 and #34 of
> > >> > current). I've done some work I could submit soon to Janne
> > >> > with weeks
> > >> > #35, #36 and #37. Let me know if i
>
> I didn't realize the problem of this thread at all sofar.
>
> But if it would be ok to have someone work on that once a week,
> then i would offer myself for this, too.
>
> Due to the expected time that is required (i spent almost five
> days of free time on 49.html), i really woul
Ciao,
Ingo Schwarze wrote [2011-11-02 15:58+0100]:
> When Nicolas did it and i saw what he said regarding mandoc(1),
> i sometimes went "Huh? Which change is that referring to?" or
> a few times even "What? I never did that..." - even though
> Nicolas certainly used care and spent considerable e
Comments on the various emails inline
> >
> > Anyway I'm a bit surprised some other people worked on it, I've worked
> > with Janne and some stuff are almost but not yet published (to week
> > #26, the beginning of c2k11 for 5.0, and week #33 and #34 of
> > current). I've done some work I coul
Hi,
Amit Kulkarni wrote on Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:18:55AM -0500:
> Yeah, its a lot of work... found out the hard way. It was a huge time
> sucker. Wow, that's something.
The hard part about it is actually *understanding* what the commits do,
to get the one-line summary right.
A good commit mes
>> I would say, you follow the github.com/openbsd repo, and do a git log.
>
> Just a question: i'm personally tracking
> git://anoncvs.estpak.ee/openbsd-{src,xenocara}, a link which was
> introduced by Stuart Henderson in a message some months ago.
>
> Is that github.com repo (beside the fact that
> I would say, you follow the github.com/openbsd repo, and do a git log.
Just a question: i'm personally tracking
git://anoncvs.estpak.ee/openbsd-{src,xenocara}, a link which was
introduced by Stuart Henderson in a message some months ago.
Is that github.com repo (beside the fact that it also off
>> > Hi,
>> > If no-one else is updating this page, I will do it. Can someone tell me
>> > what date the OPENBSD_5_0 tag was added so I know when to start from? I
>> > couldn't figure out if this was possible from cvs. My plan is to go
>> > through the source changes and plunder from the commit mes
Hey,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 06:57:22AM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Brett wrote:
> > Hi,
> > If no-one else is updating this page, I will do it. Can someone tell me
> > what date the OPENBSD_5_0 tag was added so I know when to start from? I
> > couldn't figure ou
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Brett wrote:
> Hi,
> If no-one else is updating this page, I will do it. Can someone tell me
> what date the OPENBSD_5_0 tag was added so I know when to start from? I
> couldn't figure out if this was possible from cvs. My plan is to go
> through the source changes
19 matches
Mail list logo
