I have a mail of someone who is actively fought by the henchmen of No. 43! Theo de Raadt wrote [2011-11-07 18:52+0100]: > > Even if there would have been a note that the project itself has > > chosen to use cvs(1) and that git clones are unofficial. > > wow, that's backwards.
History is very important. > if anything is official, we mention it. > if anything is not unofficial, we don't mention it. With time, dedication and a whole lotta love CVS sure will do fine. Even though i'm deaf most of the time, i've noted that git (i really doesn't like it, maybe libgit2 will someday even do transport and garbage-collection, and then) comes up once in a while, also on tech. Time will surely bring a lot of OpenBSD Mercurial and git full-history clones on the various large (free) hosters. In the first world internet is cheap today, and a background rlog which takes a week doesn't hurt (one may think). Would i like an official git repo? Yes, i would. And that's it for me on this now, really. Thanks for listening and good night, steffen
